This article presents objective news and information on personal finance topics from various sources. The content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or tax advice. It should not be interpreted as a recommendation for any investment. Readers should conduct their own research and seek professional counsel as needed. Disclaimer: The accuracy and completeness of information cannot be guaranteed.
Read More
A federal appeals court temporarily stayed a lower court ruling that invalidated most of President Trump’s tariffs, granting the administration’s request for a pause. This stay allows the administration time to argue against the lower court’s decision, which found the president lacked the authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to impose the tariffs. Plaintiffs, including state attorneys general and businesses, have a week to respond before the appeals court makes a final decision. The White House strongly criticized the lower court’s ruling, while plaintiffs expressed confidence in a reversal.
Read More
Following a phone call with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, President Trump agreed to delay the implementation of a 50 percent tariff on European Union goods until July 9, 2025. This postponement follows Trump’s earlier announcement of the tariff, which had caused market volatility. Von der Leyen requested the extension to allow for expedited trade negotiations. The agreement defused immediate trade tensions between the U.S. and the EU, averting a potentially significant economic disruption.
Read More
The U.S. is projected to lose $12.5 billion in international visitor spending in 2025, a 22.5% decline from the previous peak and a stark contrast to the growth seen in other global economies. This downturn, impacting jobs and businesses nationwide, makes the U.S. the only country among 184 analyzed to experience a decrease in international tourism spending. The decline is attributed to a failure to address issues impacting international traveler confidence, despite the strong domestic tourism market. Urgent action is needed to reverse this trend and restore the U.S.’s position as a leading global tourism destination.
Read More
Senator Rubio erroneously asserted a dichotomy between the federal and judicial branches, claiming immunity from judicial oversight in foreign policy matters. This statement reveals a disregard for the three-branch system of checks and balances enshrined in the Constitution. His position reflects a belief in executive supremacy, echoing the Trump administration’s apparent view of unchecked presidential power. This perspective, potentially emboldened by recent Supreme Court rulings, allows for actions like deportations without due process.
Read More
Moody’s recent downgrade of JPMorgan Chase (JPM), Bank of America (BofA), and Wells Fargo follows a similar action taken against the US credit rating. This move sends ripples throughout the financial world, raising questions about the stability of major American banks and the implications for ordinary citizens. The timing of the downgrade, coming on the heels of a US credit rating cut, underscores a growing concern about the overall health of the American economy.
The rationale behind Moody’s actions isn’t explicitly stated, but it’s reasonable to infer that the downgrade reflects a broader assessment of increased risk within the US financial system.… Continue reading
Despite April’s inflation rate reaching its lowest point since 2021, a new report reveals a widening gap between Americans’ earnings and the cost of a basic standard of living. The Ludwig Institute for Shared Economic Prosperity’s (LISEP) Minimal Quality of Life index indicates that 60% of U.S. households cannot afford this minimum, revealing a “functionally unemployed” rate exceeding 24%. This disparity is attributed to rising costs of essentials like housing, healthcare, and education, outpacing wage growth, particularly for low- and moderate-income families.
Read More
The House GOP’s recent unveiling of a plan to raise the debt limit by a staggering $4 trillion has sparked widespread debate and criticism. This massive increase, coming so soon after previous adjustments, raises serious questions about fiscal responsibility and the party’s stated priorities.
The sheer scale of the proposed increase is undeniably jarring. Four trillion dollars is a monumental sum, representing a significant expansion of the national debt. This raises concerns about the long-term implications for the country’s economic stability and the potential burden on future generations. It’s hard to ignore the apparent contradiction between this significant debt increase and the party’s past rhetoric about fiscal conservatism.… Continue reading
A lawsuit, *V.O.S. Selections v. Trump*, challenges the legality of President Trump’s tariffs before a three-judge panel. The plaintiffs, small import businesses, argue the tariffs violate the “major questions doctrine” due to their significant economic impact, citing a predicted $4,900 reduction in average household income. Support for this claim comes from an amicus brief signed by numerous former Republican officials. The case’s outcome, however, remains uncertain, as the major questions doctrine is novel and its application to presidential actions, especially in foreign policy, is untested.
Read More
President Trump’s tariff policies are predicted to negatively impact the US economy, potentially causing a recession. His comments suggest an expectation of fewer, more expensive imported goods. Trump downplayed the economic consequences, using the example of children receiving fewer toys as a trivial impact. This perspective ignores the broader implications of increased prices on consumer goods and overall economic stability.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood