The Independent’s reporting emphasizes the importance of factual journalism, particularly when covering critical issues such as reproductive rights and political developments, like those involving Donald Trump. In response to a recent post by Tennessee Republican Rep. Andy Ogles suggesting a third term for Trump, the publication highlighted the violation of the 22nd Amendment. This elicited strong reactions, including accusations of unconstitutionality from various figures. Furthermore, Ogles has a history of controversy, including misleading claims and controversial statements.
Read More
Donald Trump’s attempts to impose a dictatorial regime represent a direct assault on the U.S. Constitution. The critical question is not Trump’s intentions, which are clear, but rather the American people’s response. Widespread protests against his actions, including the federalization of the National Guard and deployment of troops, demonstrate the efficacy of organized resistance. This opposition, manifested in court challenges, street demonstrations, and legislative action, is proving increasingly powerful and is likely to escalate further with planned nationwide protests. The ultimate success or failure of Trump’s authoritarian push hinges entirely on the sustained strength of this national movement.
Read More
Donald Trump’s playful promotion of “Trump 2028” merchandise raises questions about the 22nd Amendment’s constitutionality, particularly given the lack of term limits for other federal offices. The amendment, passed after FDR’s four terms, restricts presidents to two terms. The segment suggests this restriction warrants further examination, citing the lack of similar limits in other branches as a potential constitutional flaw. This discussion frames Trump’s actions as potentially highlighting a broader issue of presidential term limits, not as a serious campaign announcement.
Read More
Random House will publish new hardcover editions of the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, and the Federalist Papers, featuring introductions by Jon Meacham. This release coincides with a surge in sales of these foundational American documents, driven by increased political engagement and a desire for historical context in a turbulent political climate. Sales data indicates a significant rise in demand compared to previous years, particularly exceeding sales during the early months of the Trump administration. The increased interest reflects a broader trend in the book market toward works exploring democracy and government.
Read More
President Trump’s March 4, 2025, address to Congress showcased his expansive view of presidential power, claiming unilateral authority over issues ranging from free speech to geographical renaming. This assertion of virtually kinglike power contrasts with Article II of the Constitution, which, while not granting unlimited power, establishes the president as Commander in Chief. Historical concerns, dating back to the Constitution’s ratification, mirrored contemporary anxieties about unchecked presidential authority, focusing on the potential for abuse of power as commander in chief and the granting of pardons. Ultimately, the Constitution’s success hinges not solely on its checks and balances, but on the citizenry’s ability to elect virtuous leaders.
Read More
A federal lawsuit challenges a new executive order attempting to revoke birthright citizenship for children born in the U.S. to parents lacking permanent legal status. This action, deemed “flagrantly illegal,” contradicts the 14th Amendment and established Supreme Court precedent affirming birthright citizenship. Multiple lawsuits, including one from Massachusetts, argue the order violates the Constitution and infringes upon the rights of American-born children, potentially denying them essential benefits and protections. The plaintiffs seek immediate injunctions against the order, emphasizing that the Constitution, not presidential decree, determines citizenship.
Read More
President Biden has voiced his strong disapproval of President-elect Trump’s intention to eliminate birthright citizenship in the United States. He described the idea as “awful,” highlighting the profound implications of such a move.
The cornerstone of this sentiment rests on the fundamental belief that the U.S. is a unique multicultural nation, and this diversity is a significant source of its strength. Altering birthright citizenship would fundamentally undermine this very essence.
Biden questioned the very logic of such a proposition. He pointed out the inherent contradiction in denying citizenship to individuals born within the country’s borders, questioning what principles would then define citizenship.… Continue reading
The recent chatter about Donald Trump potentially running for a third term has sparked a flurry of reactions, with some Democrats pushing for a clarification of the 22nd Amendment. The 22nd Amendment, ratified in 1951, clearly states that “No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice.” However, the ambiguity lies in Trump’s constant hinting at running again despite having already served two terms. This has led some to believe that he might try to circumvent the amendment, either by arguing that his first term was illegitimate or by finding a loophole through the amendment’s wording.… Continue reading
Despite the clear language of the Twenty-Second Amendment, which prohibits a president from serving more than two terms, President Trump has expressed interest in running for a third term, suggesting he might only do so if his potential opponent is deemed exceptionally strong. This statement disregards the longstanding constitutional restriction established in 1951, following President Roosevelt’s unprecedented four terms, and the unofficial precedent set by George Washington. The amendment unequivocally states that no person can be elected to the presidency more than twice, effectively barring Trump from seeking another term after his current one concludes.
Read More
Pennsylvania Judge Angelo Foglietta has permitted Elon Musk to continue with million dollar cash giveaways in the swing states pending a decision by a federal court. Elon Musk is giving away cash prizes to registered voters who sign a petition to support the US constitution. District Attorney Lawrence Krasner filed a lawsuit against Musk, claiming he is running an illegal lottery.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood