A federal lawsuit challenges a new executive order attempting to revoke birthright citizenship for children born in the U.S. to parents lacking permanent legal status. This action, deemed “flagrantly illegal,” contradicts the 14th Amendment and established Supreme Court precedent affirming birthright citizenship. Multiple lawsuits, including one from Massachusetts, argue the order violates the Constitution and infringes upon the rights of American-born children, potentially denying them essential benefits and protections. The plaintiffs seek immediate injunctions against the order, emphasizing that the Constitution, not presidential decree, determines citizenship.
Read More
President Biden has voiced his strong disapproval of President-elect Trump’s intention to eliminate birthright citizenship in the United States. He described the idea as “awful,” highlighting the profound implications of such a move.
The cornerstone of this sentiment rests on the fundamental belief that the U.S. is a unique multicultural nation, and this diversity is a significant source of its strength. Altering birthright citizenship would fundamentally undermine this very essence.
Biden questioned the very logic of such a proposition. He pointed out the inherent contradiction in denying citizenship to individuals born within the country’s borders, questioning what principles would then define citizenship.… Continue reading
The recent chatter about Donald Trump potentially running for a third term has sparked a flurry of reactions, with some Democrats pushing for a clarification of the 22nd Amendment. The 22nd Amendment, ratified in 1951, clearly states that “No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice.” However, the ambiguity lies in Trump’s constant hinting at running again despite having already served two terms. This has led some to believe that he might try to circumvent the amendment, either by arguing that his first term was illegitimate or by finding a loophole through the amendment’s wording.… Continue reading
Despite the clear language of the Twenty-Second Amendment, which prohibits a president from serving more than two terms, President Trump has expressed interest in running for a third term, suggesting he might only do so if his potential opponent is deemed exceptionally strong. This statement disregards the longstanding constitutional restriction established in 1951, following President Roosevelt’s unprecedented four terms, and the unofficial precedent set by George Washington. The amendment unequivocally states that no person can be elected to the presidency more than twice, effectively barring Trump from seeking another term after his current one concludes.
Read More
Pennsylvania Judge Angelo Foglietta has permitted Elon Musk to continue with million dollar cash giveaways in the swing states pending a decision by a federal court. Elon Musk is giving away cash prizes to registered voters who sign a petition to support the US constitution. District Attorney Lawrence Krasner filed a lawsuit against Musk, claiming he is running an illegal lottery.
Read More
These words echo through my mind like a haunting melody – “The Supreme Court Has Murdered the Constitution.” As I sit here on this Fourth of July, the significance of this day feels tainted by the erosion of the very principles this nation was founded upon. It is a bitter pill to swallow, realizing that the pillars of our democracy are crumbling, not under the weight of external threats, but from within.
The recent ruling by the Supreme Court, granting immunity to a president from criminal charges while in office, is a stark reminder of the unchecked power that now resides within the highest court of the land.… Continue reading
The recent news that the Supreme Court is being urged to rule Trump ineligible to be president again because of the January 6 riot has sparked a range of emotions and thoughts within me. As I reflect on this matter, I am filled with a sense of frustration, disbelief, and concern for the state of our democracy.
Firstly, it is important to address the severity of the events that took place on January 6th. It was not simply a riot, as some choose to label it. No, it was an insurrection, a coordinated effort by the Trump administration to overturn the election results through fraudulent means.… Continue reading
In the wake of the recent controversy surrounding the legality of former President Donald Trump running for office again, I have found myself deeply engaged in reflection and analysis of the situation. The idea that barring Trump’s return to politics is anti-democratic is a sentiment that has pervaded our political discourse. However, after careful consideration, I submit a different notion: Barring Trump from running for office is not anti-democratic, but rather a necessity to protect democracy itself.
The foundation of my stance lies in the understanding of the Constitution, specifically Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. This provision prohibits any person who has engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof, from holding office.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood