The White House has announced that the US will not be imposing tariffs on Colombia, at least for now. This decision marks a reversal from previous pronouncements and has sparked considerable discussion about the administration’s approach to international relations. The initial threat of tariffs seemed to stem from a perceived need to address issues around immigration.
The situation seemingly revolved around the number of deportation flights to Colombia. While Colombia had indeed accepted a significant number of deported individuals, this was within the context of ongoing agreements and practices. The volume of deportations wasn’t inherently unusual, suggesting that the initial justification for the threatened tariffs may have been misrepresented or overblown.… Continue reading
The US’s recent pause on planned tariffs and sanctions against Colombia following an agreement on migrant deportations has sparked a flurry of reactions, ranging from cautious optimism to outright outrage. The situation itself is relatively straightforward: the US, under its current administration, threatened Colombia with economic repercussions if it didn’t accept the return of its citizens who had been deported from the US. Colombia initially balked, citing concerns about the method of transport. The disagreement seemed to revolve around the use of military versus civilian aircraft for transporting the deported individuals.
This initial refusal led to the threatened tariffs and sanctions, creating a tense standoff.… Continue reading
In response to Colombia’s refusal to accept two US military planes carrying deported migrants, former President Trump announced the immediate imposition of 25% tariffs on all Colombian goods entering the US, escalating to 50% within a week. These tariffs, alongside travel bans and visa revocations for Colombian officials and their supporters, represent a significant escalation of the conflict. Colombian President Petro retaliated with his own 25% tariffs on US goods and criticized Trump’s treatment of migrants. The dispute highlights the strained relationship between the two countries and potential challenges to US immigration policy.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker