President Trump’s fluctuating trade policies, particularly the US-China trade war, are disrupting global shipping. This is leading to decreased bookings and increased “blank sailings” as freight companies struggle to adapt. Major retailers like Walmart, Target, and Home Depot have warned the White House that tariffs on Chinese goods could result in empty store shelves within weeks. These retailers heavily rely on Chinese imports, making them particularly vulnerable to the president’s actions. A significant change in trade policy is urgently needed to avert a major economic impact.
Read More
China’s recent cancellation of 12,000 metric tons of US pork shipments highlights a significant escalation in the ongoing trade dispute between the two superpowers. This represents a substantial blow to American pork producers, as China was the third-largest market for US pork in 2024, importing a considerable volume valued at over $1.1 billion. The cancellation underscores the growing tensions and the potential far-reaching consequences of the trade war.
The sheer volume of the cancelled order – 12,000 metric tons, equivalent to over 26 million pounds of pork – is striking. This isn’t a minor adjustment; it’s a deliberate action with significant economic implications for US farmers and the broader agricultural sector.… Continue reading
Following President Trump’s claim of active tariff negotiations with China, the Chinese Ministry of Commerce issued a strong denial. The ministry stated that any suggestion of progress is baseless and that any future consultations must be conducted with mutual respect and equality. China’s position demands the complete removal of all U.S. tariffs as a precondition for negotiations, rejecting Trump’s assertion of a substantial tariff reduction. This underscores the significant impasse between the two nations regarding trade policy.
Read More
Despite recent White House suggestions of de-escalation, China’s Ministry of Commerce and Foreign Ministry have unequivocally stated that no economic or trade negotiations with the U.S. are currently underway. Both ministries emphasized that any purported progress on bilateral talks is inaccurate. China insists that the U.S. must rescind all unilateral measures against China before any discussions can commence. This firm stance follows recent tariff increases imposed by both nations.
Read More
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent privately predicted a de-escalation in the U.S.-China trade war, deeming the current high tariffs unsustainable, although formal talks haven’t begun. Despite Bessent’s assessment, President Trump publicly maintained that the U.S. is “doing fine” with China, promising lower, though still substantial, tariffs and a cooperative future. However, China warned against deals detrimental to its interests, highlighting the ongoing uncertainty impacting global markets and prompting Trump to again pressure the Federal Reserve for lower interest rates. The stock market reacted positively to Bessent’s remarks, reflecting investor hopes for a resolution to the trade conflict.
Read More
Following President Trump’s softened stance on the U.S.-China trade war and expression of optimism for a deal, China’s foreign ministry spokesperson stated their willingness to engage in talks. This shift in tone, coupled with comments from U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent suggesting a de-escalation, positively impacted global markets, which saw significant gains. While Trump maintains high tariffs on Chinese imports, the potential for de-escalation has eased recession fears. Further progress remains dependent on ongoing negotiations and future statements from both sides.
Read More
Trump says the US will set terms if China doesn’t agree to a trade deal. This declaration follows a period where the initial aggressive tariff strategy seems to have yielded minimal concrete gains. The overall impression is one of a significant shift in approach, moving from a position of strength and forceful demands to a more conciliatory tone, yet still maintaining the threat of unilaterally imposed terms. This change leaves room for questions about the overall effectiveness and consistency of the initial strategy.
The current stance appears to be a significant departure from earlier, more assertive pronouncements regarding tariffs and their potential economic benefits.… Continue reading
In conversations with British and Austrian foreign ministers, Wang Yi criticized the U.S. for weaponizing tariffs, violating WTO rules, and harming global economies. He framed this as a regression to “the law of the jungle” and urged European collaboration with China to defend the multilateral trading system. China asserts its commitment to open markets and mutually beneficial cooperation while simultaneously opposing these protectionist measures. These statements align with President Xi Jinping’s recent calls for resistance against U.S. protectionism. Beijing is actively seeking international support amidst escalating trade tensions with Washington.
Read More
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent predicts a de-escalation in the U.S.-China trade war, though formal negotiations haven’t begun. Despite this prediction, Bessent acknowledges the difficulty of negotiations, with neither country viewing the current situation as tenable. President Trump’s tariffs, imposed on numerous countries, have negatively impacted the stock market and interest rates, fueling economic uncertainty. However, the White House maintains optimism about reaching a trade deal with China, while simultaneously facing pressure from China and the Federal Reserve.
Read More
China issued a strong warning to countries considering aligning with the US against it, threatening retaliatory measures against those prioritizing short-term gains over broader economic interests. This warning stems from the Trump administration’s efforts to pressure nations into reducing trade with China, offering tariff reductions as an incentive. China argues that complying with such pressure would ultimately harm those nations, emphasizing its significant role in global supply chains. The resulting tensions highlight the difficult position many countries face, caught between the US and China, two economic giants with deeply intertwined trade relationships. This situation underscores the potential for widespread economic disruption resulting from escalating trade conflicts.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood