The 90-day trade truce between the U.S. and China is being hailed as a victory in China, with officials and state media emphasizing the effectiveness of Beijing’s assertive negotiating stance. This strategy is credited with securing a deal that significantly reduced U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods from 145% to 30%, in exchange for a reduction in Chinese tariffs on U.S. goods. The agreement, celebrated widely on Chinese social media, showcases a perceived triumph of Beijing’s firm countermeasures. This positive reception highlights the impact of the reduced tariffs and underscores the narrative of Chinese success in the trade negotiations.
Read More
Following talks in Geneva, the U.S. and China agreed to a 90-day tariff reduction, with both sides lowering rates by 115 percent. This agreement, hailed by China as an important step toward deeper cooperation, aims to resolve trade tensions stemming from significant tariff increases imposed earlier. While the U.S. will maintain some tariffs, China will suspend retaliatory measures, including restrictions on rare earth minerals. The deal sparked optimism among investors, evidenced by the dollar’s surge following the announcement.
Read More
The White House declared a trade deal with China, yet China framed the outcome as a “consensus.” This discrepancy highlights a significant communication gap and raises questions about the actual progress made during the talks. The difference in terminology immediately suggests a divergence in interpretation of the meeting’s results.
The White House’s announcement of a “deal” lacked specifics, fueling skepticism. While the U.S. Trade Representative used the term “deal,” the Treasury Secretary opted for the more cautious “substantial progress.” This internal inconsistency further muddies the waters, leaving the public with a vague sense of accomplishment rather than a clear understanding of concrete agreements.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood