Health insurance premiums are expected to experience a significant surge, potentially the largest in years, attributed to factors such as Republican actions and trade war threats. According to reports, costs could rise substantially without congressional intervention to renew enhanced subsidies. In response, advocates of Medicare for All are urging Americans to consider this alternative as a cost-saving measure, citing potential savings in both finances and lives. They emphasize that a universal healthcare system could eliminate the need for private insurance and its associated costs.
Read More
Healthcare for all is a growing movement, with Oregon taking steps towards implementing a universal healthcare system. The state’s Universal Health Plan Governance Board has researched the impacts of such a system and found it would improve health outcomes and be more cost-effective. Despite potential pushback, the plan is scheduled to be completed by September 2026 and could go to a vote as early as January 2027. Supporters, organized through groups like Healthcare for All Oregon (HCAO), are working to raise awareness and ensure the legislation’s success.
Read More
Recent polling reveals significant support for Medicare for All in the United States, with nearly 60% of Americans backing the concept. The Economist/YouGov poll indicated majority support across various income levels, with opposition primarily concentrated among Republican, conservative, and Trump-supportive voters. Notably, a substantial portion of Trump voters still recognize the inadequacy of the current healthcare system, and the poll also found that over half of Americans want increased federal funding for both Medicare and Medicaid. This data aligns with previous surveys and highlights a growing desire for universal health care coverage, in stark contrast to policies like the “Big Beautiful Bill,” which proposes cuts to vital programs.
Read More
Insurance is what makes U.S. health-care prices so high. The sheer profit margins of insurance companies are staggering. They extract a significant portion of every healthcare dollar spent, far exceeding the administrative costs of government programs like Medicare. This stark contrast undermines the frequent claim that private corporations are inherently more efficient than government.
Insurance is what makes U.S. health-care prices so high because the system incentivizes cost inflation. Regulations like the Affordable Care Act’s 80/20 rule, while intending to control costs, inadvertently contribute to the problem. The rule mandates that insurers spend at least 80% of premiums on healthcare; however, the remaining 20% – allocated for administrative costs, overhead, and marketing – also includes profits.… Continue reading
Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Utah’s denial of coverage for the FDA-approved cancer drug Perjeta, prescribed by a specialist for a patient’s breast cancer treatment, exemplifies a critical flaw in the healthcare system. This denial contradicts established clinical guidelines and expert consensus, forcing the family to potentially shoulder over $160,000 in out-of-pocket costs. This case highlights how insurance companies obstruct access to necessary life-saving treatments, leaving patients in a precarious situation. The urgent need for systemic reform, including universal healthcare, is underscored by this and countless similar experiences.
Read More
Following the assassination of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson, Senator Bernie Sanders used the opportunity during an NBC News interview to advocate for universal healthcare in the US. He decried the violence as unacceptable while highlighting the public’s anger towards a healthcare system that prioritizes profit over people’s needs. Sanders emphasized the US’s uniquely low life expectancy and high healthcare costs compared to other developed nations as reasons to implement a system guaranteeing healthcare for all. He reiterated his longstanding support for universal healthcare, citing the recently introduced Medicare for All Act as a potential solution.
Read More
The recent murder is unequivocally condemned; however, the resulting online anger highlights the deeply flawed and cruel American healthcare system. This system leads to preventable deaths (60,000 annually) and significant life expectancy disparities based on socioeconomic status. Fundamental change requires a political movement prioritizing healthcare as a human right, achievable through eliminating waste and administrative bloat within the current system, not necessarily increasing overall spending. This would allow quality care for all citizens, mirroring systems in other developed nations.
Read More
A Gallup poll reveals that 62 percent of Americans—the highest percentage since 2007—believe the federal government should guarantee health coverage for all citizens. This surge in support, exceeding even that seen during the 2007 presidential election, is driven by rising healthcare costs and increasing dissatisfaction with the current system. The narrow margin between those favoring a government-run system (46 percent) and those preferring a private system (49 percent) highlights a shifting public opinion, even among Republicans. This comes as the U.S. remains the only wealthy nation without universal healthcare, resulting in significantly worse health outcomes and higher costs than peer countries.
Read More
A recent Gallup poll reveals that 62% of Americans—the highest in over a decade—believe the government should guarantee healthcare coverage, reflecting growing dissatisfaction with the for-profit system. This surge in support follows the murder of a healthcare executive, allegedly by an individual with an anti-insurance manifesto, and public outcry over insurer actions like Anthem’s coverage cuts. While Republican support for government-guaranteed healthcare has increased, the incoming administration plans to further privatize Medicare, contrasting sharply with calls for “Medicare for All.” The dissatisfaction is underscored by another poll showing Americans’ opinion of healthcare quality at its lowest point in decades.
Read More
Rep. Ro Khanna advocates for a shift towards Medicare for All in the United States, believing it’s crucial for addressing widespread healthcare inequities. He envisions this as a significant step toward a more just and equitable society, where access to quality healthcare is no longer a privilege determined by socioeconomic status.
The current healthcare system leaves many Americans struggling to afford necessary medical care, forcing difficult choices between health and financial stability. A universal healthcare system like Medicare for All would alleviate this burden, providing a safety net for everyone regardless of their income or employment situation.
While some argue that a complete transition to Medicare for All is unrealistic in the near future, Khanna’s perspective emphasizes the importance of moving progressively toward this goal.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood