Venezuela’s move to call for a UN Security Council meeting regarding US actions is, to put it mildly, an uphill battle. The fundamental issue? The United States, a permanent member of the Security Council, wields a veto. This means any resolution critical of the US, any call for sanctions, or any action deemed unfavorable to the US interests, is almost guaranteed to be blocked. It’s a system designed, some might argue, to maintain the status quo, and in this situation, it seems to stack the cards heavily against Venezuela.
The timing of this request is also interesting, especially in the context of global dynamics.… Continue reading
Venezuela’s UN ambassador, Samuel Moncada, addressed the UN Security Council, denouncing U.S. military actions, including air strikes and a naval blockade, as part of a broader plan for continental ambitions. Moncada accused the U.S. of violating international and domestic law, highlighting the seizure of Venezuelan oil tankers and the confiscation of millions of barrels of oil. The U.S. defended its actions as law enforcement, aiming to combat drug trafficking, despite being called an act of war. Ambassadors from Russia and China also expressed concerns, warning against potential intervention and infringement on Venezuela’s sovereignty.
Read More
Venezuela requests UN Security Council meet over ‘ongoing US aggression.’ So, what’s happening here? Well, Venezuela is calling for a UN Security Council meeting, alleging ongoing aggression from the United States. This situation is unfolding against a backdrop of serious concerns, with many people suggesting that the US is potentially on the verge of military action, possibly as a distraction from internal issues. This is a big deal, and it’s understandably causing a lot of worry.
The very fact that Venezuela feels the need to bring this to the UN highlights a tense situation. It suggests that Venezuela believes the US is acting in a way that violates international norms.… Continue reading
All UN Security Council members, except the US, are united in their assessment that the famine unfolding in Gaza is, in fact, a man-made crisis. This is a serious statement, and it carries a lot of weight on the international stage. Essentially, every member, with the exception of the United States, seems to agree that the conditions leading to widespread starvation in Gaza are not the result of natural disasters, but rather, the deliberate actions or inactions of those involved. This consensus points to a grim reality: the suffering of the people in Gaza is, in a significant way, preventable.
The situation on the ground in Gaza is undeniably dire.… Continue reading
Following a three-day wave of intense drone and missile attacks on Ukraine, Russia requested a U.N. Security Council meeting. This request, made by Russia’s U.N. envoy, cites alleged European interference in peace negotiations as the justification. The meeting, scheduled for May 30th, comes one day after a separate session requested by Ukraine’s allies to address the humanitarian crisis. Russia’s continued rejection of ceasefire calls and escalation of attacks contrasts sharply with Ukraine and its allies’ pleas for peace.
Read More
Following Pakistan’s violation of a ceasefire agreement and continued cross-border terrorism, India presented new evidence to the UN Security Council’s 1267 sanctions committee. India’s Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri stated that these actions are unacceptable and called on Pakistan to address the situation responsibly. The Indian Army is retaliating to the violations along the International Border and Line of Control. This follows India’s earlier Operation Sindoor, launched in response to a terrorist attack, and subsequent escalations by Pakistan.
Read More
Pakistan’s Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar confirmed the removal of The Resistance Front (TRF) from a UN Security Council statement condemning the Pahalgam attack, citing a lack of supporting evidence for TRF’s alleged involvement and contesting its classification as a terrorist group. He defended Pakistan’s actions, emphasizing the need for mentioning Jammu and Kashmir alongside Pahalgam and rejecting claims of TRF responsibility for the attack as false. Dar stated that Pakistan’s objections delayed the statement’s finalization, despite international pressure to reach a consensus. He characterized TRF as a local forum, a byproduct of the 2019 revocation of Article 370.
Read More
The US’s support for a Russian-backed UN resolution, which avoided blaming Russia for the Ukraine conflict, contrasts sharply with its rejection of a European-led resolution condemning the invasion. This conflicting vote pattern, occurring on the third anniversary of the war’s start, highlights a growing rift between Washington and its European allies. The US resolution, passed in the UN Security Council, urged a swift end to hostilities but lacked condemnation of Russian aggression. This action follows President Trump’s shift towards Moscow and away from longstanding US support for Ukraine.
Read More
For the seventeenth time this year, Russia convened a UN meeting to rewrite history and justify its Ukraine invasion, ignoring the UN Charter. Russia’s actions, including the deployment of weapons supplied by North Korea and Iran, have caused over 12,000 Ukrainian civilian deaths and widespread destruction. This aggression necessitates continued international support for Ukraine’s self-defense and pursuit of a just peace, founded on the UN Charter’s principles. Only Russia’s complete withdrawal from Ukraine can resolve this conflict. The international community must reject Russia’s attempts to distort reality and uphold the truth.
Read More
The U.S. vetoed a UN Security Council resolution demanding an immediate Gaza cease-fire due to its lack of a simultaneous hostage release provision. The resolution, overwhelmingly supported by other council members, was deemed unacceptable by the U.S. because it would reward Hamas’s actions. The veto sparked strong reactions, with Palestinians expressing outrage and Israel praising the U.S. stance. Despite the veto, the 10 elected council members reiterated their commitment to ending hostilities and securing hostage release, humanitarian aid, and civilian protection. Further action, potentially under Chapter 7 of the UN Charter, was promised.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker