On the third anniversary of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, the U.S. voted against a UN resolution condemning the aggression, instead proposing a weaker alternative that omitted any mention of Russian culpability. This action, aligning the U.S. with Russia and against most European allies, marks a significant departure from past U.S. foreign policy. The U.S. resolution, calling only for an end to the conflict, was passed alongside the Ukrainian resolution, which garnered 93 votes in favor. This stark contrast highlights a deeply troubling and arguably dishonest shift in the U.S. stance on the conflict.
Read More
Facing pressure from the Trump administration, Israel voted against a UN resolution supporting Ukraine’s territorial integrity, a move that aligned them with Russia and North Korea. This decision, described as difficult by Israeli officials, stemmed from prior requests made to the Trump administration. The vote has severely strained Israeli-Ukrainian relations, with the Ukrainian ambassador expressing disappointment and considering a formal complaint. Despite Israel’s past humanitarian aid to Ukraine, the differing votes highlight a significant rift in their relationship.
Read More
The United States voted against a UN resolution condemning Russia’s aggression in Ukraine, prioritizing a diplomatic approach aimed at bringing both sides to the negotiating table. Instead, the U.S. supported a separate, less condemnatory resolution calling for an end to the conflict. This decision reflects a broader U.S. strategy to soften its language regarding Russia, a shift coinciding with President Trump’s push for peace negotiations and criticisms of Ukraine. This strategy contrasts with resolutions passed by the UN General Assembly and supported by most EU nations.
Read More
On February 24th, Serbia inadvertently voted in favor of a UN resolution declaring Russia an aggressor in Ukraine, despite its intended abstention. President Vucic apologized for the error, attributing it to fatigue and an overwhelming workload. This vote, contrary to Serbia’s policy of neutrality regarding the conflict, is expected to negatively impact its relations with both Russia and the European Union. The resolution, amended to explicitly name Russia as the aggressor, passed with 93 votes in favor. Serbia maintains friendly ties with Russia but recognizes Ukraine’s sovereignty.
Read More
In a significant policy shift, the United States sided with Russia against a UN General Assembly resolution condemning the war in Ukraine, marking a divergence from its traditional stance and its European allies. This alignment continued in a subsequent UN Security Council vote on a US-proposed resolution that avoided explicitly blaming Russia or affirming Ukraine’s territorial integrity. The US resolution, while passing the Security Council, drew sharp criticism from European nations for failing to address Russia’s aggression. The General Assembly resolution, conversely, garnered overwhelming support, demanding Russia’s complete withdrawal from Ukraine. This unprecedented US-Russia collaboration on a UN resolution regarding the war in Ukraine has raised significant international concerns.
Read More
On the third anniversary of Russia’s invasion, the UN General Assembly rejected a U.S.-proposed resolution for ending the war that omitted mention of Russian aggression, instead approving a Ukrainian resolution demanding Russia’s immediate withdrawal. While the Ukrainian resolution passed, support was lower than in previous votes, highlighting diminished international backing. The U.S. abstained from voting on the amended version of its own resolution, reflecting tensions between the U.S. and Ukraine stemming from recent diplomatic initiatives. This outcome underscores the ongoing divisions within the international community regarding the conflict and the challenges in achieving a peaceful resolution.
Read More
The United States’ vote against a UN resolution condemning Russia’s aggression in Ukraine is a startling development, prompting widespread international condemnation and raising serious questions about the future of US foreign policy. The resolution, which overwhelmingly passed with 93 countries voting in favor and only 18 against, called for the return of occupied Ukrainian territories. This US stance places it alongside Russia, Belarus, and a number of other countries widely considered pro-Moscow, a grouping that seems profoundly at odds with traditional US alliances and values.
This decision is being described as a dramatic shift in US foreign policy, a 180-degree turn that some observers characterize as a betrayal of long-standing commitments to international norms and the defense of democratic principles.… Continue reading
The US is actively working to thwart a Ukrainian-led UN resolution explicitly condemning Russia’s aggressive war. This move has stunned many international partners, who expected the US to continue its previous support for resolutions affirming Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity.
Instead, the US administration is pushing for its own alternative text, ostensibly focused on achieving peace between Kyiv and Moscow. This proposed resolution, however, noticeably omits any mention of core principles like Ukrainian sovereignty and the accountability of the aggressor nation, Russia. This omission is raising serious concerns among allies who believe genuine peace cannot be achieved without acknowledging these fundamental principles.… Continue reading
The United States’ refusal to co-sponsor a UN resolution condemning Russia’s invasion of Ukraine marks a significant shift in its foreign policy. This decision, coupled with the U.S. opposition to directly labeling Russia as the aggressor in a G7 statement, contrasts with previous consistent support for Ukraine. The move follows recent diplomatic overtures to Russia and controversial statements by former President Trump questioning Ukraine’s leadership and suggesting resource-based repayment for military aid. These actions have sparked concern amongst Ukrainian officials and European allies regarding the future of U.S. support. The UN resolution, while able to proceed without U.S. backing, may face challenges in garnering widespread support.
Read More
Facing a potential UN resolution, Iran offered to cap its stockpile of 60% enriched uranium at approximately 185 kg, contingent upon the West dropping the resolution. This offer, viewed by Western diplomats as a delaying tactic, follows a recent IAEA report detailing Iran’s increased uranium enrichment. Despite the offer, the resolution condemning Iran’s lack of cooperation with the IAEA is expected to pass. Iran also agreed to consider allowing more experienced IAEA inspectors access, though not those previously barred.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood