It’s unequivocally not up to Russia to dictate the terms of any peacekeeping deployment in Ukraine. This is a fundamental principle of sovereignty, and any suggestion otherwise ignores the brutal reality of Russia’s unprovoked invasion. A peace that is imposed by the aggressor, rather than negotiated and agreed upon by the victim, is not peace at all. It’s simply a surrender, a capitulation to violence and aggression.
The idea of Russia defining the parameters of peacekeeping forces is fundamentally flawed. Ukraine, as the nation under attack, has the primary right to determine what security measures it deems necessary for its own protection and future stability.… Continue reading
Russia bombards Ukraine, continuing the brutal conflict that has devastated the country and claimed countless lives. This relentless assault underscores the stark reality on the ground, a reality seemingly at odds with a certain politician’s pronouncements of a “beautiful” peace deal.
The idea of a swift and painless resolution to this complex conflict, brokered by a figure whose past dealings with the aggressor nation have been, at best, controversial, feels deeply unsettling. The very notion of a “beautiful” peace deal carries an unsettlingly simplistic and potentially dangerous tone, completely ignoring the immense suffering and destruction inflicted upon Ukraine.
This proposed “peace” raises serious concerns about its potential ramifications.… Continue reading
Europe is forming a “coalition of the willing” to solidify a Ukrainian peace deal, a move driven by a clear recognition of the need for robust European leadership in the face of ongoing conflict. This initiative signals a significant shift in the geopolitical landscape, with European nations taking the reins in securing a lasting peace, effectively sidestepping the unreliable influence of certain world powers.
The formation of this coalition represents a significant step towards achieving lasting peace in Ukraine. It reflects a growing confidence among European nations in their ability to manage the situation effectively. This unified approach stands in stark contrast to previous instances of fractured decision-making and reliance on external actors.… Continue reading
In a statement on X, Swiss President Karin Keller-Sutter condemned Russia’s aggression against Ukraine, reiterating Switzerland’s commitment to achieving a just and lasting peace. This declaration follows a contentious White House meeting between Presidents Trump and Zelensky that sparked widespread international reaction. President Keller-Sutter’s statement joins numerous expressions of solidarity from other European leaders supporting Ukraine. Switzerland’s position underscores its unwavering support for Ukrainian sovereignty and a peaceful resolution to the conflict.
Read More
Following talks in Saudi Arabia, Secretary of State Marco Rubio stated that ending the war in Ukraine necessitates concessions from all parties. The U.S. and Russia agreed to restore embassy staffing, establish a peace negotiation team, and increase economic cooperation, marking a thaw in relations. However, the meeting, which excluded Ukrainian officials, prompted concerns from Kyiv and European allies about a potential deal detrimental to their interests. Subsequently, European leaders convened to coordinate their response and emphasized the need for a U.S. security guarantee to deter future Russian aggression.
Read More
Despite US assurances of Ukrainian involvement, a senior Ukrainian source confirms Kyiv received no invitation to US-Russia peace talks scheduled for Saudi Arabia. These talks, involving US envoys and potentially leading to further meetings, proceed without European participation, prompting a separate European summit in Paris. President Zelensky has firmly rejected any peace deal excluding Ukraine. Conflicting statements from US officials regarding Ukrainian involvement and the overall peace process have created uncertainty and concern.
Read More
The idea of Ukraine holding elections following a ceasefire is being floated, and it’s raising some serious questions. The suggestion seems to be coming from a particular faction within the U.S., and the timing and context are highly suspect.
This push for elections immediately following a ceasefire raises concerns about potential manipulation and undermines the very principles of fair and free elections. The circumstances surrounding a ceasefire would likely be highly unstable, making it exceptionally difficult to ensure a genuinely representative electoral process. Occupied territories, in particular, would present insurmountable obstacles, as conducting free and fair elections under duress or occupation is simply impossible.… Continue reading
President Zelenskyy unequivocally stated that only Ukraine can negotiate with Russia, rejecting any outside mediation. He emphasized the necessity of a pre-negotiation peace plan establishing a position of strength, ensuring fair terms, and guaranteeing Ukraine’s security against future Russian aggression. Zelenskyy highlighted the need for concrete international support, including security guarantees, before engaging in dialogue with Putin. He underscored Ukraine’s right to self-determination, rejecting any imposed settlement.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker