In response to President Trump’s continued interest in acquiring Greenland, several European NATO allies have deployed small military contingents to the island’s capital, Nuuk. This deployment, including personnel from France, Germany, Sweden, Norway, Finland, the Netherlands, and the UK, is part of a joint exercise and is seen by some as a political signal to the US that Europe has a vested interest in the region’s security. While the deployment is limited in size, with some countries sending only a handful of personnel, it is intended to bolster NATO’s presence in the Arctic, a response to Trump’s pursuit of Greenland, and to deter potential aggression. Amidst these developments, Danish and Greenlandic officials met with US representatives, highlighting existing disagreements about the island’s future, while Russia expressed concern over NATO’s increased military activity in the area.
Read More
Ukraine’s new defense minister revealed several significant challenges facing the military, including widespread desertions and approximately 2 million draft dodgers, as the war with Russia continues. Mykhailo Fedorov highlighted issues such as bureaucratic inefficiencies and supply chain disruptions. Despite these hurdles, Ukraine’s defense sector has experienced substantial growth in drone, electronic warfare, missile, and robotics manufacturing since the full-scale invasion began. Fedorov also announced a funding shortfall of 300 billion hryvnia, while the European Union pledged financial support to help fund Ukraine’s military and economy.
Read More
France To Send More Forces To Greenland, Says Macron, and this news really throws us headfirst into a whirlwind of geopolitical uncertainty, doesn’t it? It’s a lot to take in, especially considering the already volatile global landscape. Macron, despite whatever domestic issues he faces, has been a steadying hand on the international stage. But the implications of sending troops to Greenland? That’s something else entirely. It immediately conjures images of potential conflict, and it’s hard not to feel a sense of unease.
France To Send More Forces To Greenland, Says Macron, and the underlying question is, why Greenland? What’s driving this decision?… Continue reading
Following high-level talks in Washington, Denmark’s foreign minister, Lars Løkke Rasmussen, reported a “fundamental disagreement” with U.S. President Donald Trump over Greenland’s future, despite constructive discussions. Denmark and Greenland firmly reject Trump’s efforts to control the semiautonomous island. In response to rising tensions and Trump’s insistence on acquiring Greenland, Denmark and its NATO allies are increasing their military presence in the Arctic. Both sides agreed to form a working group to address U.S. security concerns while respecting Denmark’s territorial integrity.
Read More
On January 15, 2026, a Royal Danish Air Force C-130J Super Hercules arrived in Nuuk, Greenland, carrying Danish military personnel, following tense discussions about the U.S. desire to annex the island. Several NATO members, including Denmark, Germany, France, Sweden, and Norway, have deployed troops to Greenland for a joint military exercise. The deployment comes after talks at the White House between the U.S. and representatives from Denmark and Greenland, where a “fundamental disagreement” was acknowledged. While a high-level working group was established, the meeting did not resolve the existing tensions.
Read More
Amidst heightened tensions, Donald Trump reiterated the U.S.’s need for Greenland, asserting Denmark’s inability to protect the territory from potential threats. Despite meetings between U.S., Danish, and Greenlandic officials, fundamental disagreements persist regarding the island’s future governance, as Trump continues to pursue a takeover. In response, Denmark has affirmed its stance, emphasizing that Greenland is not for sale while allies like France, Germany, and Norway have pledged support. Both sides have agreed to create a working group to address U.S. security concerns while respecting Denmark’s boundaries.
Read More
The Trump administration has reportedly considered military action to acquire Greenland, threatening Denmark despite the kingdom’s obligation to defend the territory from attack. A 1952 royal decree mandates Danish troops to defend Greenland, while a bipartisan group in Congress seeks to block funds for a potential invasion. Despite the U.S. already having a significant military presence on the island, including the strategic Pituffik Space Base, Trump has expressed interest in outright ownership, raising concerns about undermining NATO allies and international law. Meanwhile, Greenlanders overwhelmingly oppose joining the U.S. and Danish officials have warned that a military takeover would end the NATO alliance.
Read More
Germany joins European partners with troop deployment to Greenland, a situation that has dramatically altered the geopolitical landscape, even if the initial action is just a symbolic gesture. It’s hard not to be struck by the irony of it all. Here we are, potentially facing a scenario where the US, a longtime ally, is viewed as a threat, and European nations, including Germany, are compelled to take defensive measures. The fact that this all stems from what seems like a simple desire, or perhaps a whim, of a single individual, is astounding. It’s almost unbelievable that the future of international cooperation, and potentially even global peace, could hang in the balance because of an argument over Greenland.… Continue reading
Overnight on January 14, Russian forces launched a significant attack on infrastructure in Kryvyi Rih, impacting over 45,000 electricity subscribers and leaving over 700 buildings without heat. The attack prompted the city’s water utility pumps to switch to emergency generators, resulting in lower water pressure. Despite the challenges, emergency crews were able to restore power to all affected customers by 7:30 a.m. local time, and the city’s municipal services were quickly brought back online. This attack follows similar strikes on energy facilities across Ukraine, including in Kyiv, where thousands have been left without heat amidst a severe cold front.
Read More
Estonia’s recent decision to ban 261 Russians who fought in Ukraine from entering the country, as reported by Euronews, seems like a strong move, and one that’s likely to be followed by other countries. It’s a definite statement, declaring that participation in the conflict carries consequences, at least in terms of freedom of movement. The interior ministry’s assertion that this is “just the start” hints at a potential expansion of these restrictions, and that’s something to keep an eye on.
This move immediately brings to mind questions of enforcement. How exactly does a country determine who has fought in Ukraine? The article suggests, quite reasonably, that information sharing from Ukrainian intelligence could be a key source.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood