US Invited To Greenland Military Exercises: Danish General To AFP, is a fascinating situation, unfolding with a subtle dance of diplomacy and military posturing. The fact that Denmark, a nation with a considerably smaller military, is extending this invitation is a clever maneuver, playing on the existing geopolitical landscape.
The essence of the move lies in its strategic brilliance. It’s a calculated move that places the United States in a precarious position. If the US declines the invitation, it directly contradicts its own publicly stated stance on the strategic importance of Greenland. This would undermine the narrative, particularly the one previously championed by certain political figures, that Greenland is critical for US national security.… Continue reading
President Trump’s renewed interest in acquiring Greenland, despite its status as a Danish territory and NATO ally, has sparked unprecedented dissent among congressional Republicans. Several prominent Republicans, including Senator Thom Tillis and former Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell, have publicly condemned the idea, citing concerns about its absurdity, potential damage to US alliances, and its impact on Trump’s legacy. This opposition is fueled by overwhelming public disapproval and warnings from Denmark. Facing potential repercussions, including the end of his presidency according to some, Trump has responded with threats of tariffs against countries opposing his campaign while maintaining that Greenland is necessary for national security.
Read More
According to President Emmanuel Macron, France has become Ukraine’s primary provider of intelligence, supplying two-thirds of the country’s needs in the war against Russia. Macron made these remarks during his New Year’s address to the French military, highlighting a shift from Ukraine’s previous reliance on U.S. intelligence capabilities. Furthermore, Macron acknowledged the financial support provided to Ukraine by the Coalition of the Willing, covering “100 percent” of Kyiv’s resource needs. While the U.S. previously suspended intelligence sharing, France’s support has reportedly grown, though no confirmation was provided by Ukrainian officials.
Read More
Following the rejection of his Greenland acquisition plan, President Trump threatened tariffs on countries that do not support the annexation. The President has previously threatened European allies regarding drug pricing and the same approach might be applied to Denmark. A congressional delegation visited Denmark in a show of support for both Denmark and Greenland, expressing solidarity against potential military intervention. Despite contrasting claims from the US and Danish sides regarding negotiations, NATO allies have deployed troops to Greenland to demonstrate its commitment to Greenland’s defense.
Read More
The Third Army Corps deployed the DevDroid TW 12.7, an unmanned ground vehicle armed with a .50-calibre machine gun, to hold off Russian advances for 45 days. This remote-controlled vehicle, capable of traversing rugged terrain, was operated from up to 15 miles away and provided relentless firepower, deterring enemy attacks without endangering soldiers. The UGV was crucial in the fight, with Russia unable to detect its presence, highlighting the increasing role of unmanned systems in modern warfare. The NC-13 Strike Company, specializing in UGVs, is expanding its deployment of these systems in both defensive and offensive operations, with other drone versions, including those with grenade launchers, recently approved for frontline use.
Read More
McConnell: Trump’s seizure of Greenland would ‘incinerate’ NATO alliances. That’s the core issue here, isn’t it? The sheer audacity of a potential move to seize Greenland, and the catastrophic repercussions it would unleash, are enough to make anyone pause. And as the synthesized voice of these comments, it seems natural to start with the strongest reaction: the assertion that such a move would completely dismantle NATO. This isn’t just a matter of ruffled feathers; it’s a potential dismantling of the very foundations of international cooperation and security that have kept the peace in Europe for decades.
The concerns aren’t just limited to the immediate military fallout.… Continue reading
As of January 1, 2026, China ceased all electricity imports from Russia, including the minimum contractual obligation. This decision was primarily due to the high export prices, which exceeded domestic Chinese rates, rendering further purchases economically unfavorable. The supply contract, signed in 2012 with Russia’s Inter RAO, was slated to run until 2037 and encompassed roughly 4 billion kWh annually. While exports are unlikely to resume in 2026, the Russian Ministry of Energy has not completely ruled out a future resumption if China expresses interest.
Read More
The White House has stated that the deployment of European troops to Greenland will not influence President Trump’s stance on acquiring the territory. Denmark is moving forward with plans for a larger NATO presence on the island, a move supported by several European countries. This action is seen as a message of support, following disagreements between the US and Denmark over Greenland’s future, especially amid Trump’s threats of forceful seizure, citing national security concerns. Greenland and Denmark maintain that the territory is not for sale and has rejected any threats.
Read More
France has become the primary provider of intelligence to Ukraine, now supplying two-thirds of the information previously dominated by the U.S., according to President Macron. This shift addresses Kyiv’s past reliance on American intelligence, which had been used as leverage. While the U.S. continues to offer significant intelligence support, France’s increased contribution has been highlighted amid concerns about potential changes in American aid. Macron’s remarks also coincided with a challenge to France’s domestic arms industry, suggesting potential reliance on foreign manufacturers to expedite rearmament.
Read More
Trump says Zelenskiy, not Putin, is holding up a Ukraine peace deal. Now, that’s a statement that has really stirred the pot, hasn’t it? It’s the kind of headline that instantly ignites a flurry of reactions, and for good reason. It’s a bold claim, placing the blame squarely on the Ukrainian President, Volodymyr Zelenskiy, for the ongoing conflict. This flips the script on the widely accepted narrative, where Russia, under Vladimir Putin, is seen as the aggressor.
The immediate reaction to such a statement is, well, skepticism, bordering on outright disbelief. Considering the history, and the way things are unfolding in the media, it’s difficult to accept such an assertion at face value.… Continue reading
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker