Ukrainian opposition leaders Poroshenko and Tymoshenko, despite reported contacts with U.S. officials regarding potential wartime elections, firmly oppose holding a vote until after peace is established. Both insist that elections should occur within 180 days of the war’s conclusion, rejecting calls for an immediate vote. This stance follows reports of discussions between Trump’s associates and Ukrainian opposition figures about the possibility of expedited elections. The current Ukrainian law prohibits wartime elections, and Zelenskiy has offered to step down in exchange for peace and NATO membership.
Read More
Following a meeting between US and Russian officials in Saudi Arabia, Donald Trump expressed disappointment with Ukraine’s negotiation efforts, suggesting a quicker resolution was possible. He touted his own negotiating skills and proposed Ukrainian elections as a condition for peace, a suggestion he claimed originated not from Russia but from himself and other countries. Trump also revealed past discussions with Putin regarding Ukraine, asserting that Putin initially had no intention of invading. Despite Ukraine’s absence from the talks, US and Russian officials agreed to restore embassy staffing and establish a high-level team to negotiate peace.
Read More
President Zelensky’s signing of the bill extends Ukraine’s martial law and general mobilization for another 90 days, from February 8th to May 9th. This extension, approved by the Verkhovna Rada, continues measures initially implemented in response to Russia’s full-scale invasion. The May 9th end date coincides with Russia’s Victory Day, potentially countering Kremlin narratives. The continued martial law prevents elections and restricts the movement of men of military age, a situation Russia has attempted to exploit politically.
Read More
The idea of Ukraine holding elections following a ceasefire is being floated, and it’s raising some serious questions. The suggestion seems to be coming from a particular faction within the U.S., and the timing and context are highly suspect.
This push for elections immediately following a ceasefire raises concerns about potential manipulation and undermines the very principles of fair and free elections. The circumstances surrounding a ceasefire would likely be highly unstable, making it exceptionally difficult to ensure a genuinely representative electoral process. Occupied territories, in particular, would present insurmountable obstacles, as conducting free and fair elections under duress or occupation is simply impossible.… Continue reading
Ukrainian President Zelenskyy affirmed that elections are contingent upon the cessation of active warfare and the subsequent lifting of martial law. He emphasized that current legislation prohibits elections under martial law, rendering them impossible until these conditions are met. Zelenskyy expressed his belief that elections should follow swiftly after the end of martial law. This aligns with the Ukrainian constitution, which dictates the legitimacy of the current government until a successor is elected.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood