U.S. Strikes

Ecuador Releases Submarine Survivor, Cites Lack of Evidence in US Strike Case

According to an Ecuadorian government official, Andrés Fernando Tufiño, a survivor of a U.S. strike on a drug-transporting submersible, was released by Ecuadorian authorities due to a lack of evidence of criminal activity. After being repatriated by the United States following the strike in the Caribbean, medical evaluations showed Tufiño was in good health. The U.S. military attacked the vessel, suspected of carrying drugs, killing two others. The attack has led to increased tensions in the region, including between the United States, Venezuela, and Colombia.

Read More

Petro Claims U.S. Struck Colombian Vessel, Fueling “War for Oil” Allegations

Colombian President Gustavo Petro expressed concern over a recent U.S. strike, stating there are “hints” the targeted vessel was Colombian and contained Colombian citizens. He agreed with Senator Adam Schiff’s criticism of the strikes, asserting they are illegal and risk escalating conflict. Petro further claimed the attack represents a new war front in the Caribbean, with the real goal being control of oil resources, not combating smuggling. He criticized the U.S. actions as an attempt to seize Venezuelan and Guyanese oil, comparing the situation to events in Gaza.

Read More

Iran’s Nuclear Program: Enrichment Continues, Retaliation Unlikely

Following recent U.S. strikes on its nuclear program, Iran will not retaliate further and is open to negotiations with Washington, according to a senior government official. However, Iran will continue uranium enrichment despite the attacks, emphasizing their long-standing position. The U.S. strikes, which included the use of “bunker buster bombs” on key Iranian sites, followed an earlier Israeli attack and Iranian missile responses. Despite the tension, a fragile ceasefire is currently in place.

Read More

US Strikes on Iran’s Nuclear Program: Months, Not Mission Accomplished

A U.S. intelligence report, based on early assessments, suggests that Iran’s nuclear program was set back only a few months by U.S. strikes, contradicting statements from President Trump. The report indicates that while the attacks on Fordo, Natanz, and Isfahan caused significant damage, they did not completely obliterate the facilities. Despite the findings, the White House has rejected the assessment, with some officials claiming the facilities were destroyed. Experts suggest that Iran may have moved some enriched uranium and equipment before the strikes.

Read More

Vance Raises Questions: Did Trump Tip Off Iran Before Nuclear Facility Strikes?

Following U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, Vice President JD Vance has expressed concerns that Tehran may have moved its near-bomb-grade uranium before the attacks. Israeli sources indicated that Iran had possibly relocated a significant amount of enriched uranium from a secure plant in Isfahan. Despite the President’s claims of complete destruction of nuclear sites, and the Press Secretary’s confidence in the success of the bombings, Vance’s statements suggest otherwise. The speculation around the bombings suggests that Trump’s social media threats may have tipped off the Iranians, giving them time to protect their uranium.

Read More