Bluesky, a decentralized social media platform, has experienced a surge in new users following the recent election. This influx is largely attributed to a wave of disgruntled Twitter users, now known as X, who have been unhappy with the platform’s direction under Elon Musk’s leadership.
Many users are drawn to Bluesky’s promise of a more open and less restrictive environment compared to X. They complain that their feeds on X have become overrun with content they have no interest in, often politically charged or filled with drama, even though they follow primarily artists and creators. The constant barrage of unwanted content has driven many to seek a more focused and curated experience.… Continue reading
The Guardian has announced it will no longer post content on Elon Musk’s social media platform, X, citing “often disturbing content” including far-right conspiracy theories and racism. The news organization believes the negative aspects of the platform outweigh the benefits, with the US presidential election campaign solidifying its decision. While the Guardian will not be posting on X, individual reporters will still be able to use the platform for newsgathering purposes, and the organization’s articles will still be accessible and shareable on X. The Guardian encourages readers to visit its website to access and support its journalism directly.
Read More
The recent degradation of public discourse on Twitter, fueled by Elon Musk’s actions, has led me to question why those who oppose such behavior continue to use the platform. I left Twitter nearly two years ago due to concerns about the spread of antisemitism, violence-inciting rhetoric, and the platform’s normalization of harmful misinformation. Despite its diminished influence, I believe that maintaining a presence on Twitter would be morally inconsistent with my values. While Twitter’s reach may be declining, the toxicity of the platform remains, leaving me baffled by the continued participation of those who share my concerns.
Read More
Elon Musk, the name synonymous with innovation and cutting-edge technology, has recently faced a significant setback in his investment venture. Fidelity estimates that his acquisition, known as X, is now worth nearly 80% less than what he initially paid for it. This staggering decrease in value raises questions about Musk’s business acumen and strategic decision-making. However, could there be more to this story than meets the eye?
It is essential to note that Musk reportedly overpaid for X when he made the purchase. Despite this, the sharp decline in value has undoubtedly taken many by surprise. Some may argue that this substantial loss is all part of Musk’s grand plan, a move orchestrated by a man known for his unconventional and visionary thinking.… Continue reading
Elon Musk, the billionaire tech mogul, seems to think that he is above the law. His recent no-show for testimony in a probe regarding his $44 billion Twitter takeover has caused quite a stir, with the SEC now seeking sanctions against him. This is not the first time Musk has been in hot water for his reckless behavior and blatant disregard for rules.
It’s baffling to witness someone with so much wealth and power continually defy authority without facing any real consequences. From telling advertisers and entire countries to “go f*ck themselves” to openly defying the SEC, Musk’s arrogance knows no bounds.… Continue reading
The World Bank recently made headlines after halting all paid advertising on X, formerly known as Twitter, following a CBS News investigation that revealed their promoted advertisements were appearing alongside racist content posted by a pro-Nazi and white nationalist account. This revelation sheds light on the disturbing reality of the online landscape, where hate speech and harmful ideologies can thrive unchecked.
It’s alarming to think that a reputable organization like the World Bank would inadvertently have their ads appear next to such abhorrent content. The fact that a verified X account with a substantial following actively shared racist images and praised colonization is deeply troubling.… Continue reading
Musk’s Starlink recently made headlines as it backtracked and decided to comply with a judge’s order to block X in Brazil. The saga unfolded with Brazil’s Supreme Court considering unfreezing Starlink’s bank accounts, a move that would have required a lengthy legal battle. However, in a surprising turn of events, Starlink confirmed its connection to X by refusing to block Twitter in Brazil. This decision led to the Supreme Court maintaining the freeze on Starlink’s bank accounts and raised concerns about the company’s right to operate in Brazilian territory according to ANATEL.
The subsequent block of Twitter in Brazil by Starlink marked a significant shift in the company’s stance.… Continue reading
World Bank halts paid advertising on X after CBS News finds its promoted ad under racist content.
The recent discovery that the World Bank’s promoted advertisement appeared alongside racist content on X has sparked outrage and raised questions about the platform’s commitment to brand safety. It is alarming to think that advertisements from reputable organizations like the World Bank could be associated with such abhorrent material. The fact that this is not an isolated incident but a recurring problem on X is troubling and highlights the urgent need for a comprehensive review of the platform’s advertising policies.
When I first heard the news, I was taken aback by the blatant display of racism and hate speech that was allowed to proliferate on X.… Continue reading
Advertisers axe corporate responsibility scheme after lawsuit from Musk’s X. This news leaves a sour taste in my mouth, as it showcases a blatant disregard for accountability and transparency by those in power. The decision to shut down a not-for-profit watchdog group that aids advertisers in identifying harmful content on a platform is a troubling indication of where priorities lie. Rather than addressing the concerns raised by advertisers and the general public, the response seems to be one of hostility and defiance, with Musk himself using profane language and accusing those pulling back their support of engaging in “blackmail.”
The repercussions of such actions are clear – alienating advertisers and driving them away from the platform.… Continue reading
When did a boycott become illegal? That seems to be the question on everyone’s mind as X, the social media platform owned by Elon Musk, brings forth an antitrust suit accusing advertisers of boycotting its platform. The chief executive of X, Linda Yaccarino, claims that the illegal behavior of these organizations and their executives have cost X billions of dollars. However, many would argue that it was Elon Musk’s own actions and controversial statements that led to this boycott in the first place.
Elon Musk, known for his outspoken and often polarizing opinions, seems to have shot himself in the foot with this lawsuit.… Continue reading
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker