In 2018, bipartisan concerns arose regarding Rep. Tulsi Gabbard’s potential compromise of a Syrian defector’s identity during a closed-door briefing. Staffers took precautions to prevent Gabbard from revealing the defector’s information, highlighting deep misgivings about her pro-Assad stance. Gabbard’s subsequent nomination as Director of National Intelligence has drawn criticism from former officials citing her past actions and echoing of Russian and Assad regime propaganda. These concerns center on her potential to provide unbiased intelligence briefings and the potential impact on vital intelligence alliances. The controversy underscores significant apprehension surrounding her access to top-secret information.
Read More
In short, Pete Hegseth’s bid for a Senate seat faces significant headwinds due to numerous past allegations of misconduct, including rape and sexual harassment. Despite attempts to garner support, including personal appeals from his mother, his prospects appear dim, even with Trump’s past support of similarly accused individuals. Trump himself reportedly feels Hegseth should have been more forthcoming about these allegations. This lack of transparency, coupled with the severity of the accusations, is hindering Hegseth’s confirmation chances among already skeptical senators.
Read More
Three former aides revealed Tulsi Gabbard, Donald Trump’s nominee for Director of National Intelligence, regularly consumed Kremlin-controlled RT propaganda, despite warnings about its unreliability. This aligns with Gabbard’s evolving foreign policy views, which have shifted from supporting military aid to Ukraine in 2014 to blaming NATO and the US for Russian aggression in recent years. Critics, including some Democratic lawmakers, have questioned her loyalty to the United States due to this apparent shift and her consumption of Russian propaganda. Gabbard denies these allegations, while her transition team attributes her views to her military experience.
Read More
Tulsi Gabbard’s nomination as Director of National Intelligence is facing significant opposition due to her past pro-Russia statements and alleged consumption of Kremlin propaganda. Concerns, voiced by former aides and high-ranking intelligence officials, center on her perceived sympathy towards Russia and Syria, potentially compromising her ability to lead the intelligence community. Republican senators, while prioritizing other controversial nominees, privately express doubts about her fitness for office, suggesting a difficult confirmation process ahead. Gabbard’s nomination is considered the most challenging of several controversial Trump cabinet picks.
Read More
A former National Intelligence Chairman has deemed Tulsi Gabbard unfit and dangerous for a position of power, particularly within the intelligence community. The concerns are deeply rooted in Gabbard’s perceived close ties to Russia and a history of promoting narratives aligning with Russian interests. This raises serious questions about her suitability for handling highly sensitive national security information.
The potential implications of placing someone with such alleged affiliations in a position of authority are alarming. Access to classified intelligence could be exploited, potentially compromising national security and furthering foreign agendas. The sheer risk involved demands a thorough examination of these allegations and a careful consideration of the potential consequences.… Continue reading
Former Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard, Donald Trump’s nominee for Director of National Intelligence, was briefly placed on a TSA watchlist due to an algorithm flagging her travel history and foreign connections. Although quickly removed after Gabbard publicized the matter, the incident raises questions about vetting processes for such sensitive positions, particularly given the unusual nature of a nominee being flagged for additional screening. While sources dispute her claims of political targeting, the episode highlights concerns about the interplay between foreign engagement, political rhetoric, and national security protocols. Gabbard’s past comments, including those related to Russia and Syria, further complicate her nomination.
Read More
Donald Trump’s recent appointments, including Tulsi Gabbard for Director of National Intelligence, Pete Hegseth for Secretary of Defense, and Matt Gaetz for Attorney General, represent a significant shift towards controversial figures. Gabbard, a former congresswoman with a history of promoting conspiracy theories and aligning with Russian propaganda, is particularly concerning given her new role overseeing intelligence agencies. Her past actions, including downplaying Assad’s chemical weapons attacks and spreading misinformation about US-funded biolabs in Ukraine, raise serious questions about her suitability for the position. This unconventional approach to staffing key national security positions reflects a clear preference by Trump for candidates who challenge established norms.
Read More
Lieutenant General H.R. McMaster criticized certain Republicans, including Tulsi Gabbard, for echoing Vladimir Putin’s rhetoric and displaying an “affection” for the Russian leader. McMaster specifically highlighted Gabbard’s acceptance of Putin’s justifications for invading Ukraine, contradicting U.S. intelligence assessments. This criticism follows concerns raised by Democrats regarding Gabbard’s past actions and potential allegiances, including a meeting with Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. The concerns underscore broader anxieties about Gabbard’s suitability for a national security role.
Read More
Tulsi Gabbard’s nomination as Director of National Intelligence is highly controversial due to her history of promoting Russian propaganda and supporting authoritarian regimes. Her past actions, including questioning the source of Syrian airstrikes that injured children and defending Assad’s regime, demonstrate a troubling lack of objectivity and empathy. Experts express concerns about her susceptibility to disinformation and her potential to undermine US intelligence credibility with allies. These concerns, coupled with questions about her meeting the required “extensive national security expertise” for the DNI position, raise serious doubts about her suitability for the role.
Read More
Following President Trump’s nomination of Tulsi Gabbard to lead U.S. intelligence, Democrats raised concerns about her past interactions with Russian and Syrian officials, citing potential conflicts of interest. Republicans strongly defended Gabbard, dismissing Democratic accusations of her being a “compromised” asset as politically motivated attacks stemming from her party switch and alliance with Trump. While some Republicans acknowledged needing further clarification on Gabbard’s past actions, they largely rejected the claims of her being a threat to national security. The controversy highlights partisan divisions over Gabbard’s suitability for the critical intelligence role.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood