Tulsi Gabbard’s confirmation as US intelligence chief represents a deeply unsettling development, widely viewed as a significant win for Donald Trump, but ultimately a profound loss for the nation. The appointment, initially met with skepticism given Gabbard’s controversial past and lack of relevant experience, sailed through Congress with surprising ease. The speed and lack of substantive opposition raise serious concerns about the integrity of the confirmation process itself, suggesting a disturbing lack of oversight and accountability.
The ease with which Gabbard’s nomination progressed, even with Senator Susan Collins’ surprising vote in favor, underscores a concerning trend of rubber-stamping Trump’s picks regardless of qualifications or potential conflicts of interest.… Continue reading
McConnell’s lone Republican vote against Tulsi Gabbard’s nomination is a curious event, prompting a wave of reactions ranging from grudging approval to outright contempt. The timing, coming seemingly at the tail end of his career, raises questions about the motivations behind this seemingly out-of-character decision.
Many view this vote as a belated attempt at damage control, a desperate last-minute effort to salvage a legacy severely tarnished by years of perceived complicity in the rise of divisive politics. The suggestion is that McConnell only acted now because the potential consequences of supporting Gabbard’s confirmation were minimal, allowing him to cast a dissenting vote without jeopardizing the nomination process.… Continue reading
Warner’s assertion that Tulsi Gabbard may be so unqualified she can’t legally serve as spy chief highlights a significant concern regarding her nomination. The law establishing the Director of National Intelligence position explicitly requires extensive national security expertise. Gabbard’s background, while including military service, notably lacks formal experience within the U.S. intelligence community. This raises serious questions about her preparedness to oversee numerous spy agencies and manage a budget exceeding $100 billion.
This lack of direct experience contrasts sharply with the immense responsibilities of the DNI role. The position demands a deep understanding of intelligence gathering, analysis, and dissemination, as well as intricate knowledge of international relations and national security threats.… Continue reading
Tulsi Gabbard’s nomination to Director of National Intelligence has sparked controversy, with reports surfacing of her struggling to articulate the DNI’s responsibilities and demonstrating confusion regarding key national security issues during Senate interviews. While some Republican senators expressed concerns about her qualifications, others, like Senator Eric Schmitt, voiced their support. Gabbard’s loyalty to Trump, a key factor in her selection, appears to be outweighing concerns among some GOP members. However, the lack of overt opposition to her confirmation doesn’t eliminate the considerable doubts surrounding her suitability for the position.
Read More
Senate Democrats’ decision to delay Tulsi Gabbard’s nomination is generating considerable controversy. The delay itself is sparking a multitude of reactions, ranging from cautious concern to outright outrage. Some believe the delay is a necessary precaution given the serious nature of the position Gabbard is seeking and the potential security implications involved.
The concerns surrounding Gabbard’s potential appointment to a powerful position within the intelligence community are significant. Critics question her past statements and actions, expressing worries about her suitability for a role requiring such high-level security clearances. These concerns underscore the gravity of the situation and the need for thorough vetting.… Continue reading
A former FBI director, a figurehead from the Reagan era, is expressing significant concerns regarding the potential appointments of Tulsi Gabbard and Kash Patel to positions of power. The concerns stem from a range of issues, raising serious questions about their suitability for such roles.
The director’s cautionary remarks about Kash Patel highlight Patel’s controversial past and his promotion of various conspiracy theories. His book, “Deep State Gangsters,” praised by Donald Trump, is seen as promoting unfounded allegations against the government. Patel’s advocacy of election denial, anti-vaccine sentiments, and QAnon conspiracy theories are cited as further reasons for concern. His past involvement with the Nunes Memo, an effort to discredit the FBI’s Russia investigation, and his support for the idea of suing journalists add to the apprehension.… Continue reading
Tulsi Gabbard’s nomination for national intelligence director faces significant opposition due to her past expressions of sympathy for Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, including a 2017 meeting with him. Senators have raised concerns about her apparent affinity for Assad and Vladimir Putin, as well as her support for whistleblowers Edward Snowden and Julian Assange. Gabbard has consistently justified her stance by emphasizing the threat posed by Islamic militants in the Syrian civil war and arguing against US intervention, claiming such actions would worsen the situation. Despite Assad’s recent ouster, Gabbard now aligns her views with President Trump’s stance of non-intervention in Syria.
Read More
Tulsi Gabbard’s nomination as director of national intelligence has faced significant backlash due to her past associations with Russia and Syria, including a 2017 visit with Bashar al-Assad. Critics, such as John Bolton, point to her support of Russian propaganda and question her judgment, characterizing her foreign policy views as flawed. While Gabbard met with key Republican senators to garner support for Senate confirmation, her nomination remains controversial, particularly given Russian state media’s endorsement. The confirmation process will determine whether she will oversee the nation’s intelligence agencies and a budget exceeding $70 billion.
Read More
John Bolton, Trump’s former national security advisor, expressed concern over Tulsi Gabbard’s nomination as Director of National Intelligence, citing her past meetings with Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. Bolton suggested the Syrian regime may possess compromising files on several Americans, including Gabbard, highlighting her controversial stance on Syria as a non-threat to the U.S. This follows reports of a major rebel offensive in Syria, potentially leading to the discovery of these files. Bolton’s comments raise significant concerns about Gabbard’s qualifications and potential conflicts of interest.
Read More
A letter signed by nearly 100 former U.S. officials strongly opposes President-elect Trump’s nomination of Tulsi Gabbard as Director of National Intelligence, citing concerns about her judgment and fitness for the role. The letter highlights Gabbard’s meetings with dictators such as Assad and Putin, including a 2017 trip to Syria and support for Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. These actions, the officials argue, raise serious questions about her suitability for the position. The letter urges Senate leaders to conduct closed-door briefings before confirming her nomination.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker