Republican senators, particularly those on the Senate Intelligence Committee, are privately expressing concerns about Tulsi Gabbard’s nomination as director of national intelligence, driven by her past alignment with Russia and support for Edward Snowden. Their interest in reviewing Gabbard’s FBI file suggests a belief that undisclosed information, potentially related to foreign contacts, may exist. While publicly deferring to President-elect Trump, senators hint at potential future opposition depending on the contents of the file and Gabbard’s testimony. The senators’ concerns center on Gabbard’s past support for Snowden and her stances on the Ukraine and Syrian conflicts, which have echoed Russian narratives.
Read More
On Deadline White House, former CIA Director John Brennan and former FBI Assistant Director Frank Figliuzzi expressed serious concerns regarding Tulsi Gabbard’s nomination as Director of National Intelligence. Their discussion with Nicolle Wallace centered on the implications for U.S. national security and international alliances. The analysts highlighted alarming new questions surrounding Gabbard’s suitability for the critical role. This discussion took place on November 19, 2024.
Read More
Representative Wasserman Schultz vehemently denounced Donald Trump’s nomination of Tulsi Gabbard as director of national intelligence, asserting that Gabbard is likely a Russian asset. This assessment stems from Gabbard’s past actions, including clandestine meetings with Syrian President Assad and the propagation of Kremlin-backed disinformation regarding U.S.-funded biolabs in Ukraine. Wasserman Schultz highlighted Gabbard’s history of meeting with war criminals and violating State Department guidelines as further evidence of her questionable loyalty. The congresswoman expressed grave concern over the potential security risks posed by Gabbard’s access to classified information in such a sensitive role.
Read More
President-elect Trump’s nomination of Tulsi Gabbard as Director of National Intelligence is facing significant opposition due to resurfaced reports of her ties to the Science of Identity Foundation (SIF), a controversial religious group described as a cult. Gabbard’s connections to SIF, including her husband’s involvement and her own past praise of its leader as a guru, have raised concerns about her suitability for the role. This, coupled with previous accusations of ties to a Russian spy, has led to strong condemnation from figures such as John Bolton, who deemed her the “worst cabinet-level appointment in history.” The Senate confirmation process is now expected to be highly contentious.
Read More
Wasserman Schultz’s assertion that Gabbard is “likely a Russian asset” is a significant claim, sparking a considerable amount of online debate. The statement itself is quite explosive, suggesting a level of collaboration or influence by a foreign power on a prominent American political figure. This naturally raises serious questions about national security and the integrity of the political process.
The gravity of the accusation is undeniable. Accusing someone of being a Russian asset implies a deliberate act of subversion, potentially involving espionage or the dissemination of misinformation to benefit a hostile foreign power. It’s not a casual remark; it’s a serious allegation that carries significant legal and political ramifications.… Continue reading
Ocasio-Cortez’s assertion that Gabbard’s nomination is a globally pro-war nomination stems from a belief that Gabbard’s stances, particularly regarding Russia’s actions, actively undermine international norms and stability. The argument isn’t that Gabbard herself is actively advocating for widespread conflict, but rather that her rhetoric and alliances inadvertently support actions that destabilize global security and embolden aggressors.
This perspective emphasizes the potential consequences of Gabbard’s viewpoints on the international stage. The concern isn’t solely about American interests, but about the broader impact on global peace and the legitimacy of internationally recognized principles. The argument suggests that accepting Gabbard’s positions implicitly validates Russia’s behavior and could lead to further escalation of conflicts worldwide.… Continue reading
President-elect Donald Trump’s choice for Director of National Intelligence, former Democratic lawmaker Tulsi Gabbard, has been criticized for her past statements and actions. Gabbard, a former Army National Guard soldier with no prior intelligence experience, has been accused of amplifying Russian propaganda and contradicting US intelligence assessments. Her tenure would likely be marked by clashes with government analysts who see Russia as a primary source of disinformation. While Gabbard has defended her positions, her critics cite her previous statements supporting Russia and criticizing US foreign policy as evidence of her lack of qualifications for the role. Her appointment has drawn concern from both Democrats and Republicans, highlighting a potential for controversy and conflict within the intelligence community.
Read More
The ongoing conflict in Ukraine has sparked heated debate, with accusations flying between various actors. Donald Trump’s nominee for US national intelligence chief was accused by Ukraine of being beholden to the Kremlin. Former Democratic Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard, now a Trump supporter, echoed this sentiment, suggesting that the US and NATO provoked Russia into the war by failing to address its security concerns regarding Ukraine’s potential NATO membership. Gabbard asserted that this conflict could have been avoided if the US and NATO had acknowledged Russia’s legitimate fears, emphasizing the proximity of potential US/NATO forces to Russia’s borders. While NATO has affirmed Ukraine’s future membership, it has not provided a concrete timeline for its accession.
Read More
Former National Security Advisor John Bolton has expressed serious concerns regarding Donald Trump’s nominations of Rep. Matt Gaetz and Tulsi Gabbard for Attorney General and Director of National Intelligence respectively, calling for full FBI investigations into both candidates before their Senate confirmation hearings. Bolton specifically cited Gabbard’s past espousal of Russian propaganda and Gaetz’s ongoing Justice Department investigation as reasons for concern, stating their appointments pose a “serious threat” to national security and intelligence gathering. He believes these appointments represent a significant departure from traditional practices and raise alarming questions about the integrity and competence of the Trump administration.
Read More
President-elect Trump’s nomination of Tulsi Gabbard for Director of National Intelligence is deeply concerning, as her views on China, Russia, and Syria align with those of our adversaries. Gabbard’s record shows a willingness to blame the United States for the actions of hostile powers and disregard their threats to our national security. This nomination, if approved, would place a person with ideological sympathy for our adversaries in control of America’s intelligence community, jeopardizing our national security. The Senate must prioritize the nation’s safety and reject this nomination.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood