Former CIA officer Susan Miller refuted Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard’s claims that the Obama administration manufactured intelligence to undermine Donald Trump’s 2016 election win. Miller, who helped assemble the 2019 Mueller report, emphasized that their investigation was solely focused on the data, with no external influence dictating their conclusions. The team concluded with high probability that the Russians aimed to get Trump elected, while acknowledging they could not determine the effectiveness of these efforts. Miller strongly criticized Gabbard’s assertions, maintaining that the intelligence findings were accurate and not politically motivated.
Read More
In a recent episode of South Park, a character, likely representing a show creator, expressed reluctance but acknowledged the necessity of returning due to a lawsuit and an agreement with Paramount. This episode also satirizes Trump with a sexually explicit depiction. The episode’s release is considered audacious given Paramount’s previous concessions to Trump, including the cancellation of The Late Show With Stephen Colbert and a financial settlement. This context is further complicated by South Park Digital Studios’ recent $1.5 billion licensing deal with Paramount.
Read More
Former Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard has accused the Obama administration of orchestrating a “years-long coup” to undermine Donald Trump’s 2016 election victory, releasing declassified emails to support her claims. Gabbard alleges a “treasonous conspiracy” involving Obama and his officials regarding the investigation into Russian interference. These accusations have been met with criticism from Democrats, who see it as a distraction from the Trump administration’s handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files. Trump has supported Gabbard’s statements, while the intelligence community and other Democrats have dismissed her claims as baseless and politically motivated.
Read More
Senator Mark Warner publicly criticized Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard’s competence at the Aspen Security Forum, accusing her of politicizing intelligence. Gabbard responded by releasing a report alleging the Obama administration promoted false claims of Russian interference in the 2016 election to undermine Donald Trump’s victory. However, the report was met with skepticism and accusations of being a distraction from other controversies, including the Jeffrey Epstein case. Warner further refuted Gabbard’s claims, citing a Senate Intelligence Committee investigation that confirmed Russian interference in the election, supported by both Democrats and Republicans.
Read More
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has accused the Obama administration of a “treasonous conspiracy” to falsely claim Russian interference in the 2016 election, suppressing the truth despite knowing Russia didn’t affect the outcome. Gabbard singled out officials, including James Comey, for allegedly creating a new intelligence assessment that contradicted previous findings. She claims that these officials sought to undermine the will of the American people and usurp the President, calling for investigations and prosecutions. While Gabbard’s announcement was met with skepticism from some MAGA supporters who questioned whether any action would actually result from the allegations.
Read More
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard was notably absent from a recent Senate intelligence briefing, raising questions about her standing within the administration. This exclusion follows President Trump’s public disagreement with Gabbard’s past assertions regarding Iran’s nuclear program and a damaging intelligence leak that weakened the White House’s claims about a recent strike. A senior White House official downplayed her absence, while Michael Wolff suggested her position is precarious due to the fallout from the intelligence leak. The original report stated Gabbard’s public backing of Trump’s statements, which contradict intelligence assessments, has been challenged.
Read More
Following President Trump’s assertion that Director of National Intelligence Gabbard was incorrect about Iran’s nuclear capabilities, Gabbard accused the media of misrepresenting her testimony. Gabbard’s testimony stated Iran lacks an authorized weapons program but possesses the enriched uranium to produce a weapon within weeks if assembly is finalized. The White House and Vice President Vance defended Gabbard, emphasizing her consistent alignment with the President’s stance on the Iranian threat. A final decision on a potential U.S. strike on Iran is expected within two weeks.
Read More
Following the release of an unsanctioned video on social media, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard faced President Trump’s anger. The video, reflecting on the horrors of nuclear war, was interpreted by Trump as lobbying against potential U.S. involvement in the Israel-Iran conflict. This incident, coupled with Trump publicly siding with Israeli President Netanyahu over Gabbard’s congressional testimony regarding Iran’s nuclear capabilities, indicates a decline in Gabbard’s favor with the President. Furthermore, the White House reportedly considered eliminating Gabbard’s position, potentially merging her responsibilities with another agency.
Read More
President Trump is reportedly considering disbanding the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, currently led by Tulsi Gabbard. This consideration stems from Gabbard’s unauthorized social media video criticizing the actions of “political elites and warmongers,” which the President interpreted as undermining his administration’s pro-Israel stance regarding Iran. Trump’s dissatisfaction intensified following Gabbard’s congressional testimony on Iran’s nuclear capabilities, contradicting his own assertions. Sources indicate that the President believes Gabbard provides no value to his administration, leaving her future role uncertain.
Read More
President Trump’s relationship with his Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, has reportedly deteriorated. This follows Gabbard’s video criticizing “political elites” and warning of nuclear annihilation, which Trump viewed as going “off-message.” White House officials express differing opinions on Gabbard’s role, with some suggesting she is increasingly marginalized while others defend her contributions. Trump’s displeasure stems from Gabbard’s opposition to potential military action against Iran and her public statements questioning the administration’s stance. The situation remains tense, with speculation about Gabbard’s future within the administration and her potential future political endeavors.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker