A federal judge ruled that the White House must restore the Associated Press’s access to events where other journalists are permitted, citing a First Amendment violation. The judge found that the administration’s restriction of AP access, based on their refusal to use President Trump’s preferred name for the Gulf of Mexico, constituted viewpoint discrimination. The ruling mandates equal access for AP, not unrestricted access for all journalists. The White House’s claim of simply narrowing the press pool was rejected by the judge, who deemed their reasoning “brazen.” The decision is a victory for free speech advocates.
Read More
A federal judge ordered the White House to reinstate the Associated Press’s full access to presidential events, citing First Amendment violations. The judge ruled that the government cannot retaliate against the AP for its editorial decisions, specifically its refusal to adopt the President’s renaming of the Gulf of Mexico. This preliminary injunction is a significant win for the AP amidst broader White House challenges to press freedom. While the ruling doesn’t guarantee the AP permanent access, it prevents discriminatory treatment based on viewpoint. The White House was given a week to respond or appeal.
Read More
A federal judge ruled that the White House violated the First Amendment by barring Associated Press journalists from White House and Air Force One events due to the AP’s refusal to adopt the President’s renaming of the Gulf of Mexico. Judge Trevor McFadden’s order, temporarily stayed until Sunday to allow for appeal, mandates that the White House cannot selectively restrict access based on viewpoint. The ruling emphasizes that while the AP is not entitled to preferential treatment, the government cannot deny access to journalists based on their reporting choices. The AP welcomed the decision as an affirmation of press freedom.
Read More
Following a meeting between President Trump and far-right activist Laura Loomer, at least three National Security Council staffers were dismissed. Loomer had urged the President to remove several staff members she deemed disloyal, directly leading to these firings, according to sources. Those fired include Brian Walsh, Thomas Boodry, and David Feith, while the status of other targeted officials, such as Alex Wong, remains uncertain. The White House offered no official comment on the personnel changes.
Read More
Following a review, the White House declared the matter closed regarding Atlantic editor Jeffrey Goldberg’s unintentional inclusion in a sensitive Signal group chat involving high-ranking officials. No classified information was compromised, according to the White House. Measures have been implemented to prevent similar incidents. National Security Advisor Mike Waltz remains in his position.
Read More
Following the revelation that a journalist was mistakenly added to a Signal group chat with national security officials, investigations are underway. The White House, National Security Council, and Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency will collaborate on the technical aspects of the investigation. National Security Advisor Mike Waltz accepted responsibility for the error, though the circumstances remain unclear. A federal lawsuit targets five cabinet members involved, alleging violations of federal law due to the use of Signal for official communications, while the White House denies the exchange of classified information.
Read More
Donald Trump claims he didn’t sign the Alien Enemies Act proclamation. This assertion, however, directly contradicts official White House documentation clearly stating his signature and approval of the document. The stark contrast between his denial and verifiable evidence raises serious questions about his cognitive abilities, his truthfulness, or perhaps both.
The discrepancy has led to widespread speculation and a range of interpretations. Some suggest that his denial is a calculated move to distance himself from the potentially controversial implications of the proclamation. Others speculate that he genuinely doesn’t remember signing it, implying a serious lapse in memory or cognitive decline. This possibility is further fueled by observations of his increasingly erratic behavior and apparent difficulty comprehending or recalling events.… Continue reading
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick’s on-air endorsement of Tesla stock on Fox News, urging viewers to buy due to its “unbelievably cheap” price, has raised significant ethical concerns. This action, along with other White House endorsements of the company, is seen as a departure from traditional government practices and potentially violates federal code prohibiting the use of office for private gain. Ethics experts cite this as an optics issue, questioning the appearance of favoritism towards a company experiencing financial difficulties. The administration’s actions contrast sharply with historical norms of government neutrality in promoting specific businesses.
Read More
During an awards ceremony, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy lightheartedly apologized for not wearing a suit, referencing a recent White House meeting. This attire, a military-style outfit, reflects Ukraine’s ongoing war and contrasts sharply with the suit he was urged to wear. His decision not to wear a suit reportedly angered Donald Trump, leading to a tense exchange. The Kremlin criticized the encounter, deeming Trump’s behavior unprecedented in modern diplomacy.
Read More
A heated exchange occurred between Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy and Elon Musk during a White House cabinet meeting. Duffy expressed anger over Musk and Dogecoin’s alleged attempt to undermine air traffic control personnel. The disagreement also involved a disputed claim made by Musk, the details of which remain undisclosed. This clash highlights significant tension between the administration and Musk’s business dealings. The incident underscores potential conflicts between private sector initiatives and governmental oversight of critical infrastructure.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood