The Supreme Court has some explaining to do in Trump v. US
The Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Trump v. US has left many scratching their heads and questioning the intentions of the highest court in the land. Chief Justice Roberts noted the difficulty in distinguishing official acts from unofficial ones by the President, leading to unprecedented and momentous questions about presidential powers. However, the lack of further explanation and the ambiguity left by the Court raise concerns about accountability and the balance of power in our democracy.
It is clear that the Supreme Court’s decision in this case has far-reaching implications beyond just President Trump. By establishing the scope of presidential immunity for official acts, the Court has effectively given the President a shield against prosecution for actions taken while in office.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker