Senator Ron Wyden criticized President-elect Trump’s proposed “External Revenue Service,” arguing it’s a deceptive tactic to mask massive tax cuts for the wealthy funded by increased taxes on families and small businesses. Trump intends to use tariff revenue, potentially collected by a renamed Treasury Department office, to offset the cost of extending 2017 tax cuts. However, analysis shows that resulting price increases from tariffs would outweigh the tax cuts for most Americans, benefiting only the wealthiest 5%. This proposal follows reports that Trump is considering a national economic emergency declaration to justify widespread tariffs.
Read More
Donald Trump and Elon Musk, disregarding a bipartisan agreement, drastically cut government funding, eliminating $190 million for children’s cancer research and provisions to curb junk fees and protect consumers from price gouging. This action also removed measures aimed at lowering prescription drug costs and ensuring fair pricing for rural internet services. The cuts resulted from a last-minute demand for a slimmed-down budget, prioritizing tax cuts for wealthy corporations over crucial public health initiatives and consumer protections. Democrats actively fought to maintain funding for these programs, while Republicans prioritized fulfilling the demands of their wealthy donors.
Read More
President-elect Trump’s proposed tax cuts, heavily favoring the wealthy, would be offset by cuts to social safety net programs like Medicaid and SNAP. Advisers are considering stricter work requirements and spending caps for these programs, potentially impacting millions of low-income Americans. This plan would exacerbate existing inequality, as the tax cuts would disproportionately benefit the richest 5%, while the cuts to social programs would harm the poorest. The proposed changes include increased Medicaid eligibility checks and limitations on SNAP benefits, risking the loss of healthcare and food assistance for many vulnerable families.
Read More
Concerns exist within the Republican party regarding the public’s reception to proposed changes impacting programs supporting over 70 million low-income and disabled Americans. Extending expiring provisions, coupled with Trump’s proposed tax cuts, would increase the national debt by over $4 trillion. While Republicans publicly support these cuts, they simultaneously seek deficit reduction measures, creating internal conflict over fiscal responsibility and political viability. This tension highlights the challenge of balancing tax cuts with the need for fiscal restraint.
Read More
Despite President-elect Trump’s campaign promises for tax reform, his true focus remains on delivering massive tax cuts for the wealthy and corporations. The 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, his signature legislative achievement, exemplifies this, significantly reducing corporate taxes and providing substantial tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans. The upcoming expiration of these tax cuts presents an opportunity for Trump to further his agenda by extending these benefits and potentially slashing corporate taxes even lower. These policies would further exacerbate income inequality, inflate the deficit, and strengthen the influence of corporations and wealthy individuals on American politics, ultimately hindering efforts to address pressing issues facing working families.
Read More
The proposal to raise the corporate tax rate to 28% by Kamala Harris is a step in the right direction. It is not about adding a new tax or being punitive towards businesses; it is simply about restoring a rate that was much higher in the past. Remember when companies used to be taxed at rates of 38-45%? Back in the days when America was deemed “great”? It seems fair that corporations should contribute their fair share just like the rest of us.
The issue at hand is not just about raising the corporate tax rate in isolation. It is about creating a global shift where all Western nations collectively raise their corporate tax rates to avoid companies engaging in ‘tax shopping’ and nations catering to them.… Continue reading
When I think about the fact that corporations spent their Trump tax windfall on buybacks, it’s truly infuriating. The economic policy expert who addressed the Senate Budget Committee hit the nail on the head when they highlighted how these actions further enrich executives and wealthy shareholders while neglecting worker pay. It’s a stark reminder that corporations’ primary motivation is profit above all else.
The 2017 Trump-GOP tax law was passed with promises of bolstering the economy, creating jobs, and raising wages. Yet, as predicted by many, these windfalls were instead funneled into stock buybacks. This not only artificially inflates stock prices but also feeds into the pockets of executives and shareholders, leaving workers behind.… Continue reading
The state of affairs in America is disheartening and deeply concerning. The fact that US billionaires have doubled their wealth since the 2017 Trump tax overhaul is not only unjust but highlights a glaring issue of wealth inequality in our society. The wealthiest individuals in the country have seen astronomical increases in their net worth, while the average American continues to struggle to make ends meet.
It is outrageous to think that the top 10 US billionaires are all centi-billionaires now, with figures like Jeff Bezos boasting a net worth of $198 billion. This exponential growth in wealth, especially in such a short period, is a direct result of policies that favor the rich at the expense of the majority of Americans.… Continue reading
What’s funny is you’re right. Trumps tax overhaul (while OVERWHELMINGLY helping the rich, especially by lowering the corporate tax rate to 21%).
It did also help middle class people by raising the standard deduction and reduced tax brackets somewhat.
But oh no, the business benefits are permanent while the middle class benefits expire in 2025.
What’s that? The only reason the middle class got anything at all was that Democrats threatened to filibuster at the time.
Again what have republicans done for the middle class that you or anyone would believe they are on anyone’s side but the very rich?
When lower class people get money, they spend it.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood