CEOs are desperately trying to convince Trump to reconsider his aggressive tariff policies, but their pleas are falling on deaf ears. He remains steadfast in his approach, leaving businesses scrambling to navigate the potential economic fallout. This unwavering stance is perplexing many, especially those who had hoped to influence his decisions through lobbying efforts.
The frustration is palpable as executives find their attempts to secure exemptions from these substantial tariffs repeatedly thwarted. They’re discovering that traditional lobbying tactics are proving ineffective because Trump operates largely independently, often making significant pronouncements, like those concerning tariffs, with little prior consultation, even with his closest advisors.… Continue reading
In response to President-elect Trump’s threat of a 25% tariff on all Canadian goods, Canada is preparing retaliatory tariffs and exploring options to restrict energy exports to the U.S. Ontario Premier Doug Ford explicitly threatened to cut off energy supplies to five U.S. states. A meeting of Canada’s premiers with Prime Minister Trudeau resulted in a commitment to a robust response, including bolstering border security and utilizing various retaliatory measures. The federal government is coordinating with provinces to identify key export products for potential counter-tariffs, and plans to share this strategy with the incoming Trump administration.
Read More
Despite widespread warnings from economists, President-elect Trump’s proposed tariffs face criticism for potentially increasing consumer costs. When pressed on Meet the Press, Trump initially denied that consumers would pay more but later conceded he couldn’t guarantee it, contradicting his campaign promises of lowering prices. He further deflected responsibility, claiming previous tariffs had no negative impact, a claim directly contradicted by evidence of price increases on various goods. While he expressed uncertainty about restricting abortion medication, Trump definitively committed to ending birthright citizenship upon assuming office.
Read More
Across-the-board tariffs, as proposed by Trump, will likely raise prices for consumers, especially on goods lacking domestic alternatives. This is particularly concerning for essential items like petroleum, where increased tariffs will directly translate to higher gas prices. These tariffs act as a tax on consumers, benefiting the government while harming the economy, especially those with limited incomes. The resulting economic hardship necessitates contacting elected officials to express opposition to these harmful plans.
Read More
Trump’s proposed tariff plan targeting Mexico could inflict devastating economic damage on Texas, potentially leading to a significant downturn. The state’s close economic ties with Mexico, particularly in terms of integrated supply chains, mean that any disruption to trade would be acutely felt.
Economists estimate a potential loss of nearly $47 billion annually in Texas’s gross state product – a considerable 1.7% reduction. This translates to an estimated loss of approximately 370,000 jobs, affecting a broad range of industries and workers across the state.
The impact wouldn’t be limited to a single sector. The automotive industry, a major player in the Texas economy, would face substantial challenges as the cost of parts sourced from Mexico increases.… Continue reading
President-elect Trump’s proposed tariffs on goods from Canada, China, and Mexico to combat drug trafficking would impose a significant tax burden on American consumers and businesses, potentially costing the average family nearly $1200 annually. These tariffs, unlikely to effectively curb the drug trade, could disrupt vital supply chains and invite retaliatory measures from affected countries, jeopardizing American exports and jobs. Furthermore, such actions might simply shift the drug trade to more dangerous substances, exacerbating the crisis. Ultimately, this approach risks harming the U.S. economy while failing to address the core issue of drug addiction.
Read More
Donald Trump’s proposed 25 percent tariff on all goods from Mexico and Canada is projected to severely damage the Texas economy, potentially costing the state 370,000 jobs and $46.9 billion in gross state product annually. Economists warn of retaliatory tariffs from Mexico and Canada, further exacerbating economic losses and potentially triggering inflation. This protectionist measure, intended to curb illegal immigration and fentanyl trafficking, is criticized for harming consumers through higher prices and disrupting vital supply chains. The tariffs’ impact on Texas is particularly severe due to its extensive trade relationships with Mexico.
Read More
The proposed tariffs on Canadian and Mexican goods by Trump may be in violation of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), which he himself signed in 2019. This agreement establishes largely tariff-free trade between the three nations. The irony is that Trump, in 2020, lauded the USMCA as the “fairest, most balanced” trade deal ever negotiated. Such tariffs would represent a significant departure from the agreement’s core principles.
Read More
President-elect Trump’s planned tariffs on Canada and Mexico are opposed by President Biden, who considers them counterproductive and potentially damaging to crucial relationships. Biden hopes Trump will reconsider this action, which violates the USMCA and could severely impact the Canadian economy. While both Trudeau and Sheinbaum spoke with Trump, their accounts of the conversations regarding border control and tariffs differed. Biden expressed confidence that a smooth transition would occur, despite Trump’s controversial trade policies.
Read More
Following President-elect Trump’s threat of a 25% tariff on Canadian goods, Prime Minister Trudeau convened an emergency meeting with provincial premiers. This tariff, ostensibly to combat illegal immigration and fentanyl trafficking, is viewed as economically devastating given the deep trade ties between the US and Canada. While Canadian officials dispute Trump’s claims regarding the border’s role in these issues, the threat has already negatively impacted the Canadian stock market and prompted calls for a robust, unified response, potentially including retaliatory tariffs. The situation evokes memories of previous trade disputes with the Trump administration and necessitates a reassessment of Canada’s approach to US relations.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker