President Trump announced plans to impose a 10% tariff on Chinese goods starting February 1st, citing unfair trade practices. Simultaneously, he threatened tariffs against the European Union for similar reasons. These actions follow previous threats of 25% tariffs on Mexico and Canada, prompting retaliatory measures from Canada, which is preparing counter-tariffs. Trump’s stated goal is to achieve fairer trade deals, although economists warn of potential negative consequences for American consumers and businesses.
Read More
Trump’s plan to impose 25% tariffs on imports from Mexico and Canada by February 1st is generating significant controversy and widespread concern. The sheer scale of the proposed tariffs on two of the US’s largest trading partners is alarming, particularly given the potential for reciprocal actions and the resulting economic fallout. The timing, just five years after renegotiating the trade deal with these very nations, adds another layer of bewilderment. This sudden move seemingly contradicts the stated goals of improved trade relations.
The potential for soaring prices across a wide range of goods is a major point of worry. From everyday food items like eggs – ironically cited as a reason for supporting this administration – to larger purchases such as automobiles and appliances, the impact of these tariffs will be felt by a vast segment of the population.… Continue reading
On his inauguration day, President Trump opted against immediately imposing tariffs on Canada, Mexico, and China, despite previous threats. Instead, he will direct agencies to investigate trade deficits and unfair trade practices from these countries. While this provides temporary relief for Canada, the threat of future tariffs remains, with Canada prepared to retaliate with its own tariffs on American goods should they be imposed. The decision to delay tariff implementation allows Trump to prioritize other inaugural day initiatives, but Canada remains vigilant and is proactively engaging with the Trump administration on trade concerns.
Read More
The Shopping Trends team operates independently from CTV News journalists. This team may receive commission on purchases made via provided links. Full details regarding the team’s operations are available via a linked page.
Read More
Canadian Foreign Minister Mélanie Joly warned that President-elect Trump’s threatened 25% tariff on Canadian goods would result in a “Trump tariff tax” for Americans. Canada plans retaliatory tariffs, targeting key American industries and products, should the tariffs be imposed. This action risks significant economic harm to both nations, impacting sectors such as autos, energy, and agriculture, with Canada prepared for a substantial response. The potential economic fallout is substantial, impacting both GDP and numerous American jobs, as highlighted by both Joly and former finance minister Chrystia Freeland.
Read More
Natural Resources Minister Jonathan Wilkinson warned that President-elect Trump’s proposed tariffs on Canadian goods would significantly increase gasoline prices in the U.S. Midwest, counteracting Trump’s campaign promises. Instead of escalating trade tensions, Wilkinson proposed a Canada-U.S. energy and minerals alliance to bolster North American energy security and reduce reliance on authoritarian regimes like Russia and China. This alliance would facilitate the export of Canadian petroleum and critical minerals, benefiting both countries economically. Wilkinson also refuted claims of a trade imbalance, highlighting Canada’s role as a major U.S. export market and supplier of essential resources.
Read More
The recent surge in Bitcoin’s value and Wall Street’s optimistic forecasts for 2025 paint a picture of booming wealth for the super-rich, contrasting sharply with an 18 percent increase in homelessness. Trump’s economic policies, particularly threatened tariffs, are expected to disproportionately benefit large corporations with resources for lobbying and navigating complex exemption processes, leaving small businesses struggling with increased costs and uncertainty. This widening class divide exacerbates existing economic inequalities, with the biggest businesses poised to exploit the situation while smaller enterprises face significant challenges. Economists predict that while business confidence may rise, hiring and investment may not reflect this optimism.
Read More
President-elect Trump’s threat to impose 25% tariffs on Canadian imports, and his suggestion that Canada become the 51st state, overshadows the significant negative impact these tariffs would have on American consumers. Trudeau highlights that increased costs for goods like oil and gas would harm U.S. citizens, countering Trump’s assertions of trade deficits and Canadian subsidies. Canada has prepared retaliatory tariffs on various U.S. goods should the threat materialize, mirroring previous responses to similar actions. Despite Trump’s claims of U.S. energy independence, Canada remains a crucial supplier of oil to the United States.
Read More
In response to President-elect Trump’s threatened 25% tariffs on all Canadian goods, Canada is preparing retaliatory tariffs on various American products, including orange juice, toilets, and steel. This response mirrors Canada’s actions in 2018 when similar tariffs were imposed. The proposed Canadian tariffs aim to counter Trump’s economic coercion tactics and his inaccurate claims regarding Canadian resource dependence. High-level Canadian officials have dismissed Trump’s suggestion of Canada becoming the 51st state as a serious negotiating tactic, characterizing it as a distraction from the economic implications of his proposed tariffs.
Read More
The administration is exploring sector-specific tariffs on imports deemed critical to national security, aiming to bolster domestic industries like military supplies, medical equipment, and energy production. This approach, unlike a previously proposed blanket tariff on imports from Canada, Mexico, and China, is considered potentially more palatable. Targeted tariffs are intended to incentivize domestic production and strengthen key sectors. While details on specific targeted imports remain unclear, this strategy represents a shift from the broader tariff proposals previously discussed.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood