President Trump ordered federal agencies to revoke the security clearances of and investigate former officials Christopher Krebs and Miles Taylor. Krebs, who publicly refuted Trump’s claims of election fraud, was labeled a “significant bad-faith actor” in a memorandum. Taylor, who anonymously criticized Trump’s conduct in a memoir, was accused of stoking dissension. These actions followed Krebs’s dismissal and Taylor’s outspoken criticism of the Trump administration. The move has drawn condemnation from Democrats as an attack on dissent and a step toward authoritarianism.
Read More
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard revoked security clearances for numerous individuals, including former Biden administration officials and those involved in investigations of President Trump. This action targeted individuals perceived as having “weaponized” the legal system against Trump, such as lawyers involved in cases against him and those who labeled Hunter Biden laptop information as “disinformation”. The revocations, part of a broader campaign initiated after Trump’s inauguration, also affected former President Biden, who will no longer receive the President’s Daily Brief. Several targeted individuals, including attorney Mark Zaid, have questioned the due process involved in these revocations.
Read More
Trump revoking the security clearances of Biden, Harris, Clinton, and others, described as his “enemies,” is a move sparking significant controversy. The sheer number of individuals targeted—a list extending beyond just the highest-profile names—highlights the broad sweep of this action. The decision is perceived by many as an act of political retribution, a vindictive attempt to settle scores rather than a measure based on legitimate security concerns.
This action is viewed by many as incredibly petty and childish. The time and energy dedicated to this undertaking, rather than focusing on other pressing matters, are seen as a profound waste. The underlying motivation appears to stem from a desire for revenge, fueling outrage among those who see it as further evidence of a deeply flawed character.… Continue reading
This page uses Google AMP technology for a lightweight mobile experience. Essential data is stored on your device to enable functionality, and consent is required for optional data collection. This optional data allows for personalized advertising outside the UK. Rejecting data collection prevents personalized ads, though general advertising will remain. Preferences can be modified at any time via the footer.
Read More
President Trump issued a memo revoking the security clearances of numerous political opponents, including former Vice President Kamala Harris, Hillary Clinton, and President Joe Biden. The memo cited a lack of national interest in these individuals accessing classified information, impacting their past access based on previous government roles. This action also targeted Republicans who investigated the January 6th insurrection and several lawyers who have pursued legal actions against Trump. The directive extends to family members and involves rescinding access to classified briefings and potentially other forms of access.
Read More
President Trump ordered the suspension of security clearances for Covington & Burling lawyers who provided pro bono legal services to Special Counsel Jack Smith. This action, part of Trump’s broader campaign of retribution against those involved in investigating him, targets the firm despite their assertion that they only represented Smith personally. The memo, directed at Attorney General Pam Bondi, cites concerns about the “weaponization of the judicial process,” echoing Republican claims of partisan bias within the Justice Department. This follows previous attempts by Trump to revoke clearances from perceived political opponents.
Read More
President Trump’s revocation of security clearances from over 50 former intelligence officials is unprecedented in scale and scope, exceeding actions taken by previous administrations. This action, targeting individuals who signed a letter critical of Trump’s claims regarding the 2020 election and John Bolton for his memoir, is viewed by legal experts as a politically motivated attempt to silence dissent. The former officials contend their actions were within their rights as private citizens, while the White House claims the move restores institutional credibility. Critics argue the decision undermines established norms and erodes trust in government institutions.
Read More
President Trump issued an executive order granting six-month interim security clearances to incoming White House officials facing vetting delays, a move national security lawyers deem unusual. This action, attributed to a backlog partly caused by Trump’s delayed transition process, bypasses standard security protocols, including polygraph tests. Concerns exist that this could compromise intelligence sharing with foreign partners due to the lack of vetting. The backlog stemmed from Trump’s team delaying the necessary agreements with the FBI, a delay consistent with his broader distrust of the national security establishment.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood