Special Counsel Jack Smith’s report details President-elect Trump’s multifaceted scheme to overturn the 2020 election, including pressuring state officials, the fake electors plot, and his actions on January 6th. The report, concluding that sufficient evidence existed for conviction, outlines Trump’s awareness of the falsity of his claims and his refusal to quell the January 6th riot. Trump was charged with four felonies related to this effort; however, the case was dismissed following his election victory. Trump dismissed the report as politically motivated.
Read More
The Special Counsel’s report delivered a stark conclusion: Donald Trump would have been convicted in the election interference case, had he not been elected President. This assertion, contained within the report’s final section, carries significant weight, especially considering the Department of Justice’s high conviction rate. The report unequivocally states that sufficient admissible evidence existed to secure and uphold a conviction. This isn’t a matter of speculation; the report directly assesses the strength of the case and its potential for success in a trial setting.
The report highlights that the decision to dismiss the indictment wasn’t based on a lack of evidence or weakness in the prosecution’s case.… Continue reading
The Justice Department secured permission to release Special Counsel Jack Smith’s report detailing President-elect Trump’s attempts to overturn the 2020 election, though a three-day delay remains pending potential Supreme Court intervention. This ruling comes as the Supreme Court also allowed Trump’s New York hush-money case sentencing to proceed. Trump faces multiple indictments related to election interference, including conspiracy to defraud the United States. While Attorney General Garland intends to release the election interference section of the report, volume two concerning classified documents will remain unreleased pending related cases.
Read More
Fani Willis’s disqualification from the Georgia election interference case against Donald Trump has sent shockwaves through the nation, leaving many feeling a sense of profound disillusionment with the justice system. The ruling, which centers on a conflict of interest involving a member of her prosecutorial team, has overshadowed the gravity of the allegations against Trump, leaving a bitter taste of injustice lingering.
The fallout from this decision underscores a deeply unsettling reality: that even the most egregious actions may go unpunished. The sheer audacity of the attempts to overturn a legitimate election, coupled with allegations of mishandling classified documents, seems to pale in comparison to the perceived procedural missteps of the prosecution.… Continue reading
I can’t help but feel a sense of vindication and hope as the news of Trump being charged in a superseding indictment in the federal election interference case unfolds. It’s a moment that many of us have been waiting for, a moment that seems to be inching closer to holding those in power accountable for their actions.
The fact that a new grand jury has made the decision to re-indict Trump on the same election subversion counts, even without considering certain evidence, speaks volumes. It shows that there are individuals within the justice system who are willing to push forward, despite the challenges and obstacles that might come their way.… Continue reading
The Judge overseeing the Georgia election interference case has dismissed some of the charges against Trump. The reason cited for this dismissal was the vague nature of the charges, specifically regarding the “violation of his oath of office.” The Judge, Scott McAfee, stated that the charges must be quashed due to a lack of specificity, opening the door for a potential reindictment if the charges can be made more specific. This decision does not exonerate Trump, as there are still many charges remaining in the indictment.
In my opinion, this ruling seems to be a reasonable one aimed at preventing an inarticulate charge from being overturned on appeal.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood