President Trump’s executive order aims to accelerate deep-sea mining within and beyond US waters, prioritizing access to critical minerals for various sectors. This move, intended to bolster the US economy and counter China’s dominance in the market, has been condemned by China as a violation of international law. Concerns remain regarding the environmental impact on deep-sea ecosystems, with many nations advocating for a moratorium until further research is conducted. Despite these concerns, at least one mining company is actively pursuing permits to begin operations.
Read More
President Trump’s executive order, aiming to promote meritocracy, targets disparate-impact liability, a legal principle addressing unintentional discrimination. This order calls for a review of all pending cases under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA), potentially hindering efforts to protect women from credit discrimination. While the EO doesn’t change the law itself, federal agencies’ compliance could effectively stall litigation and roll back protective regulations, impacting access to credit and housing for various protected groups. The order’s ultimate impact may unfold through future court cases, potentially reaching the Supreme Court.
Read More
In response to a Trump executive order deemed retaliatory, Susman Godfrey, the firm behind a successful $787 million lawsuit against Fox News, filed suit. The executive order bars the firm from federal contracts, revokes employee security clearances, and prohibits access to federal buildings. This action, described as unconstitutional and discriminatory, is viewed as part of a broader Trump administration campaign targeting law firms challenging his administration. Susman Godfrey’s lawsuit, supported by Munger Tolles & Olson, challenges the president’s actions and asserts the right of lawyers to represent clients without fear of reprisal.
Read More
President Trump issued an executive order targeting Susman Godfrey, the law firm representing Dominion Voting Systems in its successful defamation lawsuit against Fox News. The order aims to severely restrict the firm’s ability to conduct business with the federal government, including limiting access to government buildings and revoking security clearances. Susman Godfrey has vowed to challenge the order, citing its unconstitutionality. This action follows similar orders against other firms representing political rivals, with some firms challenging the orders in court and others settling. The orders are widely viewed as an attempt to intimidate legal professionals from opposing the administration.
Read More
President Trump’s executive order, titled “Restoring Trust in American Elections,” mandates new voting rules deemed unconstitutional by many. The order, driven by unsubstantiated claims of voter fraud, oversteps executive authority by dictating state election procedures, including requiring proof of citizenship on voter registration forms and restricting mail-in ballot deadlines. This action is predicted to face legal challenges due to its infringement upon states’ rights to regulate their own elections, as explicitly outlined in the Constitution. The order also includes impractical demands, such as mandating the use of nonexistent voting machines, further highlighting its potential flaws.
Read More
President Trump’s executive order, ostensibly aimed at ensuring fair elections, includes provisions exceeding executive authority, such as mandating documentary proof of citizenship and ballot receipt deadlines. More concerningly, the order empowers the Justice Department to withhold federal election funding from states refusing information-sharing agreements. This compels states to share data on voter registration, even routine maintenance tasks, potentially weaponizing the DOJ against states. Election experts warn this oversteps presidential power and could cripple state election administration.
Read More
President Trump signed an executive order eliminating collective bargaining rights for over one million federal employees across numerous agencies, citing the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978. This action expands upon previous efforts to curtail union influence and affects employees in national security and other critical areas, excluding law enforcement. Unions strongly denounce the order as union-busting and a retaliatory attack, vowing legal challenges to protect workers’ rights and ability to advocate for better working conditions. The White House contends that unions obstruct agency management.
Read More
President Trump’s new executive order, imposing a proof-of-citizenship requirement for voter registration and threatening penalties for states counting late ballots, has sparked immediate backlash from Democrats and voting rights advocates. Legal experts deem the order unlawful, an abuse of executive power potentially disenfranchising millions of voters, and a blatant attempt to reshape election administration. The ACLU and other prominent legal groups have pledged to challenge the order in court, anticipating extensive legal battles. Critics argue the order is an unconstitutional power grab designed to undermine the 2026 midterm elections.
Read More
President Trump’s sweeping executive order seeks to dramatically expand federal control over elections, potentially disenfranchising millions of voters. The order attempts to restrict voter registration, punish states allowing late-arriving ballots, and utilize federal databases to review state voter rolls, ostensibly to combat rare instances of non-citizen voting. This action is expected to face immediate legal challenges, with several Democratic officials already vowing to sue. The order also directs changes to voter registration procedures and voting system certifications, significantly altering the EAC’s role. Critics argue the order is a politically motivated attempt to suppress voter turnout.
Read More
President Trump signed an executive order initiating the dismantling of the Department of Education, though full abolishment requires Congressional approval. While the White House claims critical functions like student loan oversight will continue, the order directs significant downsizing, prompting immediate legislative action from Senator Cassidy. Opponents, including Democrats and several advocacy groups, strongly criticized the move, citing potential harm to vulnerable student populations and unconstitutionality. Public polling reveals widespread opposition to eliminating the department.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker