Widespread protests erupted nationwide on February 5th, denouncing a perceived coup by Trump, Musk, and other oligarchs. Demonstrators urged Senate Democrats to intensify their opposition, including by blocking Trump’s cabinet nominees and halting all government functions until the alleged power grab ceases. The protests, organized swiftly across various groups, highlighted rising outrage over attacks on democratic rights, federal workers, and marginalized communities. Democratic lawmakers are escalating their resistance, including through filibusters and proposals to combat the administration’s actions. The movement reflects a growing anti-MAGA sentiment unified against what protesters describe as a fascist threat to the nation.
Read More
Donald Trump and Elon Musk are orchestrating a coup in the United States, systematically dismantling constitutional governance through illegal actions. This involves seizing control of federal systems, purging civil servants, and disregarding Congressional oversight. The resulting shift from a government bound by law to one ruled by personal loyalty represents an existential threat to American democracy. Urgent action is required to resist this institutional capture before it’s too late. This is not a partisan issue, but a fight for the preservation of the constitutional order itself.
Read More
The January 6th, 2021 attack on the US Capitol, while presented by some as a minor incident, was a culmination of a broader effort by Donald Trump and his allies to overturn the 2020 election results. This included pressure on election officials, the promotion of misinformation, and the deployment of “fake electors.” Despite the violence and arrests, a significant portion of the population, particularly Republicans, downplay the event’s severity, exhibiting a concerning normalization of the attempted coup. This revisionist narrative, fueled by disinformation campaigns from certain media outlets, suggests a concerning vulnerability to manipulation within the information ecosystem.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker