New York Signs AI Safety Bill Into Law, Ignoring Trump Executive Order is a really interesting development, and it’s got me thinking. It seems New York is making a clear statement here. Executive orders, at least in this case, are essentially just…suggestions. They carry no weight over state laws. It’s like, you can’t tell the states what to do; they have their own power.
It’s pretty satisfying, in a way, to see Trump’s pronouncements not hold sway. He can huff and puff all he wants, but New York’s new AI safety bill is going into effect regardless. It is a clear act of defiance, and it is satisfying.… Continue reading
DOJ Likely Pulled Photos of Trump from Released Epstein Files
So, the Department of Justice (DOJ) released a bunch of files related to Jeffrey Epstein, that much we know. But the story took a sharp turn when it became clear that a photo, potentially containing images of Donald Trump, vanished from the digital release. The timing? Right after the files went public.
The original documents were organized numerically, and the missing photo was labeled “EFTA00000468.” By Saturday, it was gone. What’s more, the file library seemed to jump from “EFTA00000467” to “EFTA00000469,” which is a pretty clear indication of a deliberate deletion.… Continue reading
Following the addition of President Trump’s name to the Kennedy Center, several members of the Kennedy family have publicly voiced their disapproval. Kerry Kennedy announced plans to physically remove the added lettering, while Maria Shriver criticized the move, suggesting it does not equate to greatness. Concerns have also been raised about the legality of the renaming, citing a law that restricts the addition of memorials or plaques. Furthermore, Representative Joyce Beatty has claimed that the vote to add Trump’s name was not unanimous and that she and others were silenced during the conference call.
Read More
Co-sponsors of the law mandating the release of Jeffrey Epstein investigation materials are considering drafting articles of impeachment against Attorney General Pam Bondi and potential contempt of Congress charges. While the Justice Department released documents, Rep. Ro Khanna claims the disclosure was insufficient, with critical documents missing and excessive redactions. Khanna warned that any Justice Department official who obstructed justice could face prosecution. The released documents included limited references to President Donald Trump but numerous mentions of former President Bill Clinton, though no context was provided with the photos of Clinton.
Read More
The Department of Justice released a large, but incomplete, collection of Jeffrey Epstein files on Friday, a move that followed a missed deadline for full disclosure as required by the Epstein Files Transparency Act. The released files included declassified documents, many heavily redacted, and some already publicly available. Notably, searches for “Trump” and “Epstein” yielded no results within the released documents. Democrats vowed to pursue all legal options in response to the limited release, expressing concerns over the lack of transparency and the withholding of key information.
Read More
The Department of Justice, according to Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, announced it would not be releasing all files related to Jeffrey Epstein, despite a law signed by President Trump mandating their release. The initial release included several hundred thousand documents, with more expected in the coming weeks, while prioritizing the protection of victims. This decision comes amidst scrutiny of Trump’s relationship with Epstein, who he had previously called a “terrific guy” and is linked to other high-profile figures. There is concern that the Justice Department’s redaction process might impede the full transparency that victims are hoping for and that the law demands.
Read More
The Trump administration is working to redact thousands of Jeffrey Epstein documents before a Friday deadline for their release, involving Justice Department attorneys and counterintelligence specialists. Attorneys are grappling with limited guidance, causing concern regarding transparency. The push to release the files followed pressure from both sides of the political spectrum, and the DOJ has the authority to redact certain information. Legal document specialists are concerned about potential over-redaction and errors, fueled by the limited time lawyers have to process the files.
Read More
During a televised address, President Trump delivered a performance marked by escalating volume, rapid speech, and egregious falsehoods, potentially setting records for its level of mendacity. His erratic behavior appeared to be a desperate attempt to combat plummeting approval ratings, reflecting a “used-car-salesman-on-coke” demeanor. From a psychological viewpoint, Trump displayed denial, anger, and bargaining, stages outlined in the Kübler-Ross model, by denying reality, ranting, and making promises he couldn’t keep. The speech, delivered from a bizarre set, also included anti-immigrant hate speech, blaming his predecessor and scapegoating immigrants.
Read More
Kelly says he wishes someone would tell Trump ‘how math works’, and frankly, it’s a sentiment many people share. It’s not just about simple arithmetic; it’s about understanding the fundamental principles of numbers and how they impact reality. The core issue seems to be that a significant portion of the electorate, and apparently Trump himself, struggles with these basic concepts. The frustration stems from the idea that sound decision-making, in any field, relies on a solid grasp of mathematical truths. When those truths are ignored or distorted, it leads to a distorted understanding of the world.
The problem, as articulated here, isn’t just that Trump might misunderstand math; it’s that he seems uninterested in grasping it.… Continue reading
President Trump signed an executive order to reclassify marijuana as a Schedule III drug, a significant change in federal policy that aligns with many states’ stances. This reclassification, similar to a proposal by his predecessor, would move cannabis away from its current classification alongside heroin. The shift could alter regulation and reduce taxes for the cannabis industry, though it wouldn’t legalize recreational use nationwide. Despite this move, some Republicans oppose the change, citing concerns about safety and potential impacts.
Read More