During a Nevada rally, President Trump endorsed a proposal to eliminate all federal income taxes. This suggestion followed a crowd member’s request to suspend all federal taxes, prompting Trump to propose funding the government solely through tariffs on imported goods. He cited a historical period without income tax, suggesting tariffs could generate sufficient revenue. Trump argued this system, while not without drawbacks, led to a period of great American prosperity.
Read More
Trump doesn’t get to decide what the Constitution means. This is a foundational principle of American democracy, a system built on the rule of law, not the whims of a single individual, no matter how powerful. The Constitution is a document meant to guide and limit the power of government, to ensure that no one person or group can rise above its constraints.
Trump doesn’t get to decide what the Constitution means because the very nature of a constitution is to establish a framework of rules that transcend individual interpretations. It’s not a flexible document subject to the president’s personal beliefs or political agenda.… Continue reading
Following a hold imposed by the Biden administration, President Trump has ordered the release of 2,000-pound bombs to Israel. This decision, anticipated by many, stems from concerns over civilian casualties in Gaza during the recent conflict. Trump’s announcement on Truth Social confirms the resumption of arms deliveries previously stalled due to humanitarian concerns. The move comes amidst ongoing criticism of Israel’s military actions and a recent ceasefire, which has involved prisoner exchanges.
Read More
Over twenty House Democrats penned a letter expressing their profound disapproval of President Trump’s dismissals of inspectors general. The sheer number of signatories, however, seems inadequate given the gravity of the situation. The action itself felt more like a symbolic gesture than a substantial challenge to the president’s actions.
The letter’s impact likely fell far short of what was needed. It raises questions about the Democrats’ overall strategy in confronting the president’s actions, and whether such a measured response is sufficient to counter what many see as blatant abuses of power. Perhaps a more forceful approach would have resonated better.
The underwhelming response from the Democrats highlights a broader concern about their effectiveness in countering the president’s actions.… Continue reading
President Trump advocated for Arab nations, including Jordan and Egypt, to increase their intake of Palestinian refugees from Gaza, potentially leading to a significant population reduction and rebuilding of the area. Simultaneously, he lifted his predecessor’s ban on supplying Israel with 2,000-pound bombs, a decision justified by their purchase from the United States. This action contrasts with the previous administration’s efforts to mitigate civilian casualties. Trump’s proposals, while potentially controversial, aim to address the ongoing conflict and the humanitarian crisis in Gaza.
Read More
This section encourages readers to submit confidential information. The Daily Beast welcomes tips from the public. All submissions will be kept secure. Readers are invited to share any relevant information they may possess. Contact details for submission are provided.
Read More
Trump’s decision to release the 2,000-pound bombs to Israel after Biden’s suspension of the supply has ignited a firestorm of reactions, ranging from outrage to quiet acceptance, depending largely on one’s political leanings and perspectives on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The sheer weight of these munitions, capable of inflicting significant destruction, instantly raises the stakes of any potential conflict. This action underscores the complex geopolitical landscape and the far-reaching consequences of seemingly simple decisions concerning arms transfers.
The immediate aftermath of the announcement saw a resurgence of debate among those who had abstained from voting in the previous election due to concerns about the candidates’ stances on Palestine.… Continue reading
A 45-minute phone call between then-President-elect Trump and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen regarding the US’s proposed purchase of Greenland was described by European officials as “horrendous” and “very tough,” marked by Trump’s aggressive demands and threats of retaliatory measures. Frederiksen firmly rejected the proposition, stating Greenland is not for sale and belongs to the Greenlanders. Trump’s pursuit stemmed from Greenland’s rich natural resources, crucial for economic and strategic interests. This incident highlighted existing tensions regarding Greenland’s autonomy and its relationship with both Denmark and the United States.
Read More
Nigel Farage, speaking to a right-wing audience including members of Trump’s inner circle, expressed confidence in winning the next UK general election, hoping it occurs while Trump remains president. This sentiment reflects a deep-seated animosity within the Trump administration towards Keir Starmer’s Labour government, stemming from perceived betrayals and disagreements over policy. The Trump team views Starmer’s leadership negatively, citing issues like the handling of race riots and alleged child grooming cover-ups. Consequently, Trump’s administration is actively exploring strategies to undermine Starmer’s government, potentially including influencing the next UK election.
Read More
President Trump fired seventeen inspectors general, prompting accusations of undermining governmental oversight. This late-night purge, deemed legally questionable by some, removed watchdogs responsible for identifying waste, fraud, and abuse within federal agencies. Critics argue this action dismantles checks on presidential power and facilitates widespread corruption, while supporters may claim it removes those who oppose the administration. The firings seemingly violated federal law by failing to provide Congress with the mandated 30-day notification.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood