When asked if she agreed with the president’s assessment of inflation, the Georgia representative stated that grocery and energy prices remain high. She noted increased electricity bills in both Washington, D.C., and Rome, Georgia, highlighting affordability as a significant issue. Unlike the president’s claims, the representative expressed concern for the financial well-being of the younger generation.
In a recent ruling, a federal judge issued a permanent injunction against President Trump, preventing the deployment of National Guard troops to Oregon. The judge determined the president exceeded his authority in federalizing the Guard, as the criteria for doing so, namely a danger of rebellion and obstruction of federal law enforcement, were not met. The ruling found Trump’s actions violated federal law and the 10th Amendment. The court’s decision, however, does not preclude future deployments if conditions warrant it, and the government is expected to appeal the decision.
The United States, under President Trump, has granted Hungary a one-year exemption from sanctions related to Russian oil and gas purchases. This decision, confirmed by a White House official, came after a meeting between Trump and Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, a close ally who has maintained ties with Russia. Trump cited Hungary’s difficulty in obtaining energy from alternative sources as justification. The exemption follows the US blacklisting of Russian oil companies, and it appears to contradict Trump’s earlier stance on penalizing those who do business with them.
Grocery prices are increasing nearly twice as quickly as under the previous administration, despite President Trump repeatedly claiming that they are “way down”. Government statistics, in fact, show a significant increase in food inflation since he initiated a trade war, primarily due to tariffs paid by American importers. Experts point out that unlike some of his other claims, the cost of groceries directly impacts nearly every American, making his statements particularly misleading. Trump has deflected questions about the issue, even making incorrect assertions about international trade and the US economy during interactions with reporters.
Trump Is pushing us toward a Crash. It could be 1929 all over again.
The economic landscape under Republican administrations, particularly since 1953, paints a concerning picture. History shows a clear pattern, with a significant number of recessions, a vast majority, beginning under Republican leadership. This context sets the stage for a worrisome present, especially when considering the actions of a figure like Donald Trump. His history of business failures, marked by multiple bankruptcies, raises serious red flags. Could the United States, under his influence, be heading towards a financial catastrophe mirroring the Great Depression?
The potential for a severe economic downturn under Trump’s guidance is a very real possibility, and it’s something that should concern everyone.… Continue reading
In a legal defeat for the Trump administration, a federal judge ruled that the deployment of National Guard troops to Portland, Oregon, was unlawful. The ruling, made by U.S. District Judge Karin Immergut, permanently blocks the use of military force to quell protests, rejecting the administration’s claim of a rebellion justifying the troops. This decision, which followed an earlier interim order, comes after the city of Portland and the Oregon Attorney General’s Office sued, arguing the administration exaggerated violence to justify the deployment. The Justice Department is likely to appeal the ruling, potentially leading the case to the Supreme Court.
A federal judge in Oregon has issued a permanent injunction preventing the Trump administration from deploying the National Guard in Portland to address protests against immigration policies. The judge, appointed during Trump’s term, ruled that the deployment was unjustified because there was no rebellion or inability to execute federal laws. Oregon officials and the California Attorney General celebrated the decision, calling Trump’s actions an abuse of power and a win for the rule of law. The Justice Department, however, immediately appealed the ruling, arguing the deployment was necessary to address violence and protect federal personnel and property, and the case remains ongoing.
During a White House meeting with Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, President Trump reacted strongly to questions about affordability, dismissing concerns as a “con job” by Democrats. He insisted prices were “way down” and claimed the U.S. had more jobs and investment than any other country in history. Despite this, recent data showed rising consumer prices, including for gas, food, and energy. This response reflects the sensitivity surrounding the issue as Democrats capitalized on economic anxieties during recent elections.
Responding to questions about a court ruling concerning the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, Trump emphasized the need for national “liquidity” to address potential crises, seemingly indicating his administration’s reluctance to fully fund the program. This stance appears to be a veiled criticism of “tax and spend” policies, attempting to deflect from the fact that his administration is defying court rulings. The national debt has been increasing at an alarming rate, especially with the current government shutdown costing the country billions weekly, despite Trump’s claim about spending. Trump’s claims are ironic since his presidency has also had a high cost to the country.
A federal judge ordered the Trump administration to fully fund SNAP benefits for 42 million Americans by Friday. However, the Justice Department immediately appealed this decision. The judge ruled the USDA’s initial plan to provide partial payments violated his previous directive, emphasizing the harmful consequences of delaying benefits. The judge also criticized Trump’s intent to defy the court order, despite the White House’s attempts to clarify its position. Following the ruling, the administration’s actions were met with strong criticism from various groups who insisted the administration was playing politics with people’s lives.
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood