President Trump, despite previously praising the USMCA as the “best agreement ever,” now claims it unfairly burdens Americans, prompting him to announce a 25% tariff on Canadian and Mexican goods. He asserts these tariffs are necessary to achieve reciprocity in trade, despite his earlier positive assessment of the agreement. This action, however, contradicts his past statements and runs counter to economists’ warnings of negative consequences for American consumers. Trump maintains that the tariffs will benefit the U.S., ultimately rectifying perceived imbalances.
Read More
In a joint release, Representatives DeLauro and Wasserman Schultz estimate that President Trump and Elon Musk have fired at least 6,000 veterans from federal employment. This action, they contend, is a betrayal of veterans’ service and constitutes an unacceptable attack on those who served the nation. The federal government employs a significant number of veterans, and the current administration’s actions could result in the loss of up to 500,000 veterans’ jobs. This data is an estimate based on publicly available information, due to a lack of response from the administration regarding the firings.
Read More
Following President Trump’s call for reduced defense spending, President Putin voiced support for a 50% cut in both US and Russian defense budgets, suggesting China’s potential future participation. Simultaneously, Putin downplayed concerns regarding US-Ukraine resource agreements, while proposing joint US-Russia ventures in rare earth metals, including a significant aluminum supply deal and potential mining projects. This offer extended to collaboration in Russian-occupied territories. The proposals follow Trump’s earlier call for nuclear arms limitation talks with Putin and Xi Jinping.
Read More
Despite Ukrainian President Zelenskyy’s refusal of two draft agreements demanding $500 billion in compensation—including mineral, oil, and gas revenues—for US support against Russia, former President Trump claims a final deal is imminent. This deal would reportedly grant the US access to Ukraine’s substantial mineral reserves, including rare earths. Zelenskyy firmly rejected the initial proposals, citing the exorbitant and intergenerational cost. Trump, however, maintains the agreement will be mutually beneficial.
Read More
Trump’s directive to federal employees to detail their weekly activities was defended as a necessary measure to identify non-existent or unproductive workers, thereby addressing alleged government inefficiencies and misallocation of funds. Critics, however, argued the measure was illegal. Trump’s justification centered on weeding out ghost employees and ensuring accountability within the federal workforce. The policy aimed to verify the employment status of federal workers and determine whether taxpayer money was being appropriately utilized. This approach was met with legal challenges.
Read More
During a February 24th meeting with French President Macron, President Trump declined to label Vladimir Putin a dictator, citing a preference for observing unfolding events. This contrasts with his prior labeling of Ukrainian President Zelensky as a dictator, a statement echoing Russian propaganda and ignoring Ukraine’s martial law. Trump’s comments came amidst negotiations for a potentially lucrative minerals deal with Ukraine, valued at $500 billion, though the deal’s fairness has been questioned. Further meetings with Zelensky and UK Prime Minister Starmer are scheduled.
Read More
Trump’s alleged plan to liquidate public lands to fund a sovereign wealth fund is alarming. This isn’t just about selling off some extra acres; it’s about dismantling a fundamental part of America’s heritage and future. The scale of this potential land grab is breathtaking, encompassing national parks and Bureau of Land Management areas. These lands aren’t simply undeveloped spaces; they are invaluable natural resources, crucial for clean water, air, and the livelihoods of countless communities.
The potential buyers are equally unsettling: tech billionaires and other wealthy individuals, painting a picture of a future where access to these lands is limited to the ultra-rich.… Continue reading
Senator Bernie Sanders’s recent Iowa rally, drawing overflow crowds, marks a significant shift from his 2019 visit promoting the Build Back Better plan. This tour focuses on mobilizing opposition to a second Trump presidency and its agenda of federal deregulation and corporate tax cuts. Sanders framed the fight as a continuation of historical struggles against oligarchy, emphasizing grassroots action to counter the influence of billionaire donors and pressure vulnerable Republican representatives. Despite some attendees expressing disappointment in the Democratic Party’s response to Trump, the event fostered a sense of community and renewed political engagement among participants.
Read More
Despite convivial appearances, Macron’s Oval Office meeting with Trump revealed strained transatlantic relations, particularly regarding the Ukraine war. A notable disagreement arose when Macron corrected Trump’s inaccurate claim that Europe only loaned money to Ukraine, stating Europe contributed 60% of the total aid. While Trump expressed openness to a European peacekeeping force and a deal securing Ukrainian mineral revenues, he maintained his controversial stance on the war’s origins and timeline, and his desire to meet with Putin. Macron’s strategy focused on managing the situation and emphasizing a united European front, coordinating with Starmer to present a unified approach to Trump.
Read More
Trump’s recent actions demonstrate a pattern of installing loyalists, regardless of qualifications, into key positions within the Justice Department, intelligence services, and the military. This includes appointments such as Pam Bondi as Attorney General, Tulsi Gabbard in intelligence, and Kash Patel in multiple roles, effectively granting Trump direct control over these agencies. The Friday military purge, culminating in the appointment of John Dan Caine as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, further solidified this pattern. These moves, while seemingly contradictory, simultaneously serve to troll political opponents and advance a potential consolidation of power. The overall effect is a concerning concentration of power in the hands of the President.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood