Trump’s bid to slash teacher training funds has reached the US Supreme Court, a move that has ignited a firestorm of controversy. The stated reason for this drastic cut is that the funds allegedly promote “divisive ideologies.” This claim, however, feels deeply insufficient considering the potential ramifications for the nation’s educational system and, consequently, its future.
The argument that fewer teachers and less teacher training are beneficial seems counterintuitive, bordering on absurd. It suggests a deliberate undermining of the very foundation upon which a well-functioning society is built: an educated populace. This action seemingly prioritizes short-term political gains over the long-term prosperity and development of the country.… Continue reading
Passwords and mobile numbers belonging to key members of Donald Trump’s national security team have been unearthed by the German news outlet Spiegel.de, raising serious concerns about the administration’s cybersecurity practices. The sheer volume of easily accessible personal information is alarming. Spiegel’s investigation revealed a trove of sensitive data, including mobile phone numbers, email addresses, and even some passwords, publicly available through various online sources.
This readily available information included details for high-ranking officials like National Security Adviser Mike Waltz, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth. The ease with which these details were obtained is deeply troubling.… Continue reading
House Speaker Mike Johnson’s suggestion to eliminate federal courts in response to unfavorable rulings against the Trump administration has drawn sharp criticism from House Democrats. Ranking Member Jamie Raskin and Vice Chair Ted Lieu denounced the proposal as an outrageous assault on judicial independence, warning that such actions would fundamentally alter the country’s democratic system. While Congress possesses the authority to restructure the judiciary, concerns remain about the potential for this to lead to significant court backlogs and the creation of an authoritarian regime. At least one Senate Republican also expressed reservations about the practicality of this approach.
Read More
The country’s most powerful institutions are indeed exhibiting a troubling tendency to yield to Trump’s influence, a phenomenon that has reached a critical juncture. The recent actions of *The Atlantic* magazine, however, suggest a potential turning point. Their publication of private chat logs detailing sensitive military discussions within the administration constitutes a direct and significant challenge to the current power dynamics.
This act by *The Atlantic* isn’t merely a journalistic scoop; it’s a calculated move that forces the administration into a difficult position. By publishing the unredacted conversation, the magazine effectively neutralizes the administration’s ability to claim national security concerns as a reason for silencing criticism.… Continue reading
Readers are encouraged to submit news tips to The Daily Beast. The submission process is straightforward and confidential. This allows readers to contribute directly to the publication’s investigative journalism. Your tips may lead to impactful reporting.
Read More
The Atlantic published screenshots of war plans shared via Signal by President Trump’s national security team, contradicting officials’ denials. This followed an earlier report where the magazine’s journalist was inadvertently added to the group chat. While initially withholding details due to national security concerns, the magazine released the information after officials claimed no classified information was shared and the operation had already concluded. The publication of these plans sparked outrage and calls for investigations into the officials’ actions and potential compromise of national security. Congressional probes have been launched to examine this security breach.
Read More
The Trump administration’s accidental inclusion of *The Atlantic*’s editor in a Signal chat containing details of a Yemen attack has prompted a debate over the release of the messages. Despite denials from administration officials that classified information was shared, *The Atlantic* argues the public interest demands disclosure given the sensitive operational details and the potential national security risks involved. The messages reveal real-time updates on the attack, including launch times and target confirmation, highlighting the serious implications of using unsecured channels for such sensitive military communications. *The Atlantic* has decided to publish the unredacted texts, with the exception of a CIA officer’s name, after receiving objections from the White House and CIA.
Read More
Trump officials all but dare the Atlantic to release the text messages from a Signal group chat concerning a Houthi strike, creating a high-stakes game of chicken with potentially serious legal ramifications. The officials’ challenge hinges on their repeated assertions that the messages contained no classified information, a claim met with considerable skepticism.
This seemingly brazen challenge is a risky gamble. If the texts are indeed devoid of classified material, releasing them would expose the administration’s actions and potentially damage their credibility. However, the very act of daring the Atlantic to publish suggests a belief that the texts might contain sensitive information, information they are unwilling to have exposed to public scrutiny.… Continue reading
Newly released Signal messages from a private group chat involving senior Trump administration officials reveal highly sensitive details about planned strikes on Houthi targets in Yemen, including specific timings and real-time updates on the attacks’ success. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and National Security Advisor Mike Waltz shared this information, directly contradicting their claims that no classified material was exchanged. This breach raises serious concerns about the handling of sensitive information within the Trump administration and the potential catastrophic consequences had this information fallen into enemy hands. The incident has sparked calls for resignations and promises further congressional inquiry.
Read More
Newly released text messages from a Signal group chat of top Trump national security officials reveal extensive operational details about a Houthi strike, contradicting claims that sensitive information wasn’t shared. The messages, published by The Atlantic, include precise timelines for the deployment of F-18s and drones, shared just hours before the attack. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth himself confirmed the mission’s launch and provided the specific timings of the strikes. Despite the White House’s continued denials and attempts to discredit the reporting, the National Security Council has verified the authenticity of the text thread. The publication of this information raises concerns about potential risks to US personnel.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker