Federal worker unions have filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration over the inclusion of a “loyalty test” in federal job applications. The lawsuit alleges that the administration is creating an unconstitutional system of political patronage through the Merit Hiring Plan, which includes open-ended essay questions about aligning with the President’s Executive Orders. Despite OPM’s clarification that the questions are “encouraged,” the unions argue that their review by hiring managers and political appointees suggests their use in the hiring process. These questions have appeared in thousands of job postings, including those unrelated to politics, prompting concerns about undermining a nonpartisan workforce.
Read More
Trump administration’s failure to fully fund food aid benefits by Friday, as mandated by the US judge, immediately raises a multitude of concerns. The most pressing of these is, quite simply, the potential for millions of Americans to face food insecurity. The very core of this ruling is about ensuring people have access to basic necessities, and the potential for non-compliance throws this into stark relief. The fact that the administration is even considering defying the order speaks volumes. It’s almost as if the judge’s ruling carries no weight, a sentiment echoed by the concerned citizens.
This blatant disregard for the legal process feels like a recurring theme.… Continue reading
Trump Officials Accused of Bullying Tactics to Kill a Climate Measure
This story really hits a nerve, doesn’t it? It’s a stark reminder of the lengths some people will go to obstruct progress, especially when it comes to climate action. We’re talking about a situation where the Trump administration, during its tenure, allegedly employed some seriously aggressive tactics to kill a deal designed to curb pollution from cargo ships. The implications of this are vast, and frankly, a bit frightening. The fact that the story is based on unnamed diplomats speaking out of fear of retribution speaks volumes about the atmosphere created by these actions.… Continue reading
The ongoing government shutdown has caused significant disruptions to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), leaving millions of recipients without access to their food benefits. Due to the shutdown, people like Gia Haley and Erica Arneson have not received their SNAP payments, forcing them to rely on food banks or skip meals altogether. A federal judge has ordered the Trump administration to distribute SNAP funding in full, but the delay has already caused widespread hardship. Food banks across the country are facing increased demand and are struggling to meet the needs of those affected.
Read More
The Supreme Court has allowed the Trump administration to enforce its policy blocking transgender and nonbinary individuals from selecting passport sex markers that align with their gender identity. This decision, a win for the conservative majority, halts a lower court’s order and means the policy can be enforced while the lawsuit continues. The State Department’s policy change followed an executive order that limited sex recognition based on birth certificates. Plaintiffs argue that this policy risks safety for transgender people as they travel, while the government maintains it is vital for accurate identification.
Read More
A federal judge in Rhode Island has ordered the Trump administration to fully deliver SNAP payments to states by Friday. The order came after weeks of uncertainty surrounding the program during the government shutdown. The judge determined the administration needed to use additional funding to ensure payments were delivered in full. This action followed a lawsuit alleging that the USDA’s actions were arbitrary.
Read More
A man accused of assaulting a federal officer by throwing a Subway sandwich at him during the Trump administration’s law enforcement surge in Washington, D.C. was found not guilty. Despite video evidence of the incident and the officer’s testimony, the jury deliberated for seven hours, ultimately determining that the sandwich did not constitute an assault. The defense focused on the lack of bodily harm, highlighting the trivial nature of the incident and the officer’s colleagues’ reaction, which included gag gifts mocking the event. This verdict underscores the continued resistance of D.C. residents and the willingness of the U.S. Attorney for D.C. to bring assault cases to federal court, regardless of their perceived weakness.
Read More
AP News reports that Sean Charles Dunn, a former Justice Department employee, was found not guilty of assault after throwing a sandwich at a federal agent during the Trump administration’s law enforcement surge in Washington. The viral video of the incident made Dunn a symbol of resistance. Dunn’s defense argued the sandwich toss was a harmless gesture of protest protected by the First Amendment. Prosecutors faced a setback in the case, mirroring broader pushback against the Justice Department’s handling of surge-related criminal cases.
Read More
A prominent Democrat has accused the Trump administration of ending a criminal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein’s alleged co-conspirators, claiming it was a “shameful and gigantic cover-up”. The investigation, which reportedly involved interviews with nearly 50 women, was allegedly targeting a network of individuals involved in Epstein’s sex trafficking operation. Despite these testimonies identifying over 20 co-conspirators, the investigation was abruptly halted, and case files were transferred to the Justice Department’s headquarters. The Democrat is now requesting information on the investigative steps taken since then.
Read More
Rep. Jamie Raskin has sent a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi questioning the Trump Administration’s decision to abruptly end a criminal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell’s co-conspirators. The investigation, which was active until January 2025, involved nearly 50 survivors who provided detailed information to the SDNY prosecutors and FBI agents, identifying at least 20 co-conspirators. However, the DOJ and FBI closed the case in July 2025, citing a lack of evidence against uncharged third parties, despite the survivors’ credible testimonies and the previous reliance on their information to convict Ghislaine Maxwell. As a result, the House Judiciary Committee is seeking documents related to the investigation and considering reforms to the Crime Victims Rights Act.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood