In SNAP appeal, the Trump administration shockingly argued that they faced more harm than the countless individuals who couldn’t afford food. It’s a statement that immediately raises eyebrows, a seeming inversion of basic human empathy and societal responsibility.
The core of the issue, as I understand it, is a dispute over funding for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, which helps low-income individuals and families purchase food. The administration, in its legal arguments, appeared to prioritize its own perceived interests, perhaps political maneuvering or maintaining certain policies, over the well-being of those reliant on SNAP. This is where it gets interesting, or rather, incredibly frustrating.… Continue reading
Trump administration moves to dissolve ban on Abrego Garcia’s removal to deport him to Liberia: It’s hard not to feel a surge of bewilderment, maybe even a little anger, when you hear about the Trump administration’s relentless pursuit of Abrego Garcia. It’s almost unbelievable, this laser focus on one individual, especially when contrasted with the administration’s stated priorities, or lack thereof, when it comes to supporting everyday Americans. The fact that the government is allegedly spending a considerable amount of resources on this, while simultaneously claiming a lack of funds for vital programs like SNAP, is jarring. The apparent irony isn’t lost on anyone.… Continue reading
Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson temporarily halted a lower court order mandating the Trump administration provide full federal food benefits to approximately 42 million Americans. This temporary stay allows a federal appeals court more time to consider the Trump administration’s request for an extended pause of the district court’s decision regarding Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) payments. The Trump administration sought emergency relief due to depleted contingency funds, stating that fulfilling the lower court’s order would necessitate diverting funds from critical Child Nutrition Programs. The legal dispute arose after the Trump administration said SNAP payments for November would be insufficient due to the government shutdown, prompting a lawsuit and resulting in the district court’s initial order.
Read More
The Supreme Court has temporarily halted a lower court’s order requiring the Trump administration to pay full SNAP benefits to 42 million Americans for November due to the ongoing government shutdown. This decision came after an appeals court denied the administration’s emergency request to halt the order, but it also said it would soon rule on whether the administration was entitled to a stay of the order. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s order pushed the appeals court to quickly determine whether to issue a stay, citing the administration’s need to transfer billions to fund SNAP benefits. This decision will be in effect for a maximum of 48 hours after the First Circuit’s resolution of the pending motion.
Read More
A federal judge has ordered the Trump administration to fully fund November’s food aid for 42 million low-income Americans, blocking a plan to provide reduced benefits during the government shutdown. The judge accused the administration of withholding SNAP benefits for political reasons, ordering the USDA to fully fund the program. Despite the ruling, the administration has appealed the decision, citing a lack of funds and expressing concerns about court overreach. This ongoing legal battle has created uncertainty about SNAP benefits, prompting states to encourage recipients to budget and seek assistance from food pantries.
Read More
The Supreme Court has temporarily allowed the Trump administration to withhold approximately $4 billion needed to fully fund the food aid program, SNAP, for November. This action, a stay issued by Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, gives a lower court more time to consider the administration’s request for partial funding, which was initially prompted by a judge’s order to fully fund the program. The administration argued that fully funding SNAP would cause “shutdown chaos”, while the judge accused the administration of withholding benefits for “political reasons” after the administration previously stated they would only provide $4.65 billion in emergency funding. The legal battle stemmed from the administration’s decision to provide only partial funding for SNAP amid the federal government shutdown.
Read More
The Trump administration and Cornell University have reached a multimillion-dollar agreement to restore over $250 million in federal funding. As part of the deal, Cornell will pay the government $30 million over three years and invest $30 million in research benefiting US farmers. The university will also provide anonymized admissions data for federal audits, conduct surveys on campus climate, and in return, the government will restore funding and close ongoing investigations. This agreement, echoing settlements with other Ivy League institutions, reflects the administration’s ongoing focus on campus oversight and academic practices.
Read More
A federal judge in Rhode Island has mandated the Trump administration fully fund nationwide SNAP benefits for November, citing the government’s “arbitrary and capricious” decision to only partially fund the program. This ruling, coming after a challenge from a coalition of cities and nonprofits, requires full funding to be delivered to states by November 7th. The administration, however, immediately appealed the order, despite prior court decisions mandating at least partial payments. The decision follows a week of mixed signals from the Trump administration regarding SNAP funding, and amid warnings from the Agriculture Secretary that funds beyond November are unavailable.
Read More
In response to a judge’s order to distribute full November SNAP benefits, the Trump administration has appealed, seeking to block the directive and continue with planned partial payments. Despite the administration’s stance, some states like Wisconsin have already begun issuing full benefits, while others are still working on partial distributions. The court battle has created uncertainty for SNAP recipients, with some states awaiting further guidance. The administration argues the court order violates the separation of powers.
Read More
Following the death of Randall Alberto Gamboa Esquivel, who was deported to Costa Rica in a vegetative state after being detained by US immigration authorities, his family has accused the US of negligence. A spokesperson for the Trump administration, however, maintained that the medical treatment provided to Gamboa was sufficient, citing his illegal re-entry into the US. Gamboa, who was initially held in Texas detention centers before being hospitalized and eventually deported, died in Costa Rica on October 26th. Former Costa Rican President Óscar Arias has condemned the treatment Gamboa received, while the Trump administration has reiterated its focus on consequences for those who break the law.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker
Family Speaks Out After Deportation of Man in Vegetative State, Blames ICE
Following the death of Randall Alberto Gamboa Esquivel, who was deported to Costa Rica in a vegetative state after being detained by US immigration authorities, his family has accused the US of negligence. A spokesperson for the Trump administration, however, maintained that the medical treatment provided to Gamboa was sufficient, citing his illegal re-entry into the US. Gamboa, who was initially held in Texas detention centers before being hospitalized and eventually deported, died in Costa Rica on October 26th. Former Costa Rican President Óscar Arias has condemned the treatment Gamboa received, while the Trump administration has reiterated its focus on consequences for those who break the law.
Read More