The Trump administration is escalating its campaign to expand executive power, targeting the Library of Congress and claiming it falls under executive branch authority. This assertion, along with attempts to influence other independent agencies like the GAO, represents a broader effort to blur the lines separating government branches. The administration’s actions have faced some resistance, including legal challenges and pushback from Congress, though limited. The White House’s rationale centers on a claimed mandate to rein in spending and reshape governance, ignoring established norms of separation of powers. Control over the Library would grant access to vast amounts of sensitive data, including congressional research requests and copyright information.
Read More
Republican politicians are struggling to defend the economic consequences of recent policy changes, particularly concerning Medicaid cuts. Senator Joni Ernst’s insensitive response to concerns about the impact on vulnerable populations exemplifies this difficulty. This challenge stems from the inherent difficulties in justifying sweeping economic overhauls that inevitably cause short-term pain and negatively affect some segments of the population. Previous instances, including comments by Trump and Lutnick, demonstrate a pattern of minimizing the impact of these changes on ordinary Americans.
Read More
Really, Secretary Rubio? I’m Lying About the Kids Dying Under Trump? The sheer audacity of Secretary Rubio’s denial of the deaths caused by the Trump administration’s dismantling of USAID is staggering. His claim that “no children are dying on my watch” is a blatant falsehood, a callous disregard for the overwhelming evidence demonstrating a catastrophic increase in child mortality due to the withdrawal of vital humanitarian aid. The scale of this tragedy, measured not in the hundreds, but in the tens or even hundreds of thousands of deaths, is simply horrific.
This isn’t about partisan politics; it’s about the lives of vulnerable children in impoverished nations.… Continue reading
The Trump administration’s plan to prioritize “patriotic Americans” for federal jobs, requiring applicants to submit essays outlining how they would advance the president’s policy priorities, has sparked considerable controversy. This initiative, ostensibly aimed at ensuring government employees align with the administration’s agenda, raises serious questions about meritocracy and the potential for political bias in hiring.
This approach departs significantly from traditional civil service principles, which emphasize impartiality and competence over political allegiance. Instead of relying on established qualifications and performance evaluations, the new system would prioritize applicants demonstrating enthusiastic support for President Trump’s policies. This creates a scenario where ideological conformity becomes a crucial hiring criterion, potentially overlooking qualified candidates who hold differing viewpoints.… Continue reading
The National Association of the Deaf (NAD) filed a lawsuit against President Trump and White House officials for discontinuing the use of American Sign Language (ASL) interpreters at public briefings. This action, alleging violation of disability discrimination laws, follows a similar lawsuit settled during the Biden administration, which mandated ASL interpretation. The NAD argues that the lack of interpreters prevents deaf Americans from accessing critical information regarding national and international issues. The lawsuit seeks an injunction requiring in-frame ASL interpretation at all relevant White House events.
Read More
PBS filed a lawsuit against President Trump to prevent the termination of federal funding. The suit, mirroring a similar action by NPR, argues that Trump’s executive order violates the U.S. Constitution and federal law by attempting to control PBS’s programming and funding. PBS contends that the president’s actions constitute viewpoint discrimination and an infringement on editorial independence. The lawsuit cites a federal telecommunications law explicitly prohibiting government interference in public broadcasting.
Read More
The Supreme Court sided with the Trump administration, halting a Biden-era program granting temporary legal status to over 500,000 immigrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela. This decision, opposed by Justices Jackson and Sotomayor, overturns a lower court ruling that prevented the immediate revocation of this status without individual assessments. The ruling allows the government to proceed with ending the program, potentially leaving hundreds of thousands of individuals undocumented and subject to deportation. This action is part of a broader legal battle between the Trump administration and lower courts regarding immigration policies.
Read More
HuffPost’s unwavering commitment to truthful, fact-based journalism has spanned two decades. This dedication requires continued reader support to ensure its future. Past contributions have been vital to navigating challenging periods and strengthening the newsroom. Sustaining this vital work now depends on renewed reader engagement and financial contributions. The publication expresses deep gratitude for past and ongoing support.
Read More
Attorney General Pam Bondi ended the American Bar Association’s (ABA) access to nonpublic information on President Trump’s judicial nominees, citing the ABA’s perceived bias toward Democratic administrations and its function as an “activist group.” This decision prevents nominees from providing waivers for the ABA’s access to information, responding to questionnaires, or participating in interviews. The move follows past conservative criticisms of the ABA’s ratings, with previous presidents altering the organization’s role in the nomination process. This action comes despite the ABA’s long history as a nonpartisan organization that evaluates nominees’ qualifications.
Read More
Two-year-old American citizen Emanuelly Borges Santos was deported to Brazil with her undocumented parents by the Trump administration, despite possessing a U.S. passport and Social Security card. Brazilian officials were surprised by her presence among the deportees, and Manu now lacks access to healthcare and education while living on a temporary tourist visa. Her parents claim they were not given a choice regarding her deportation, contradicting DHS statements. This incident highlights concerns about the Trump administration’s mass deportation efforts and the potential impact of a Supreme Court ruling on birthright citizenship.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood