A federal judge ordered the Trump administration to return hundreds of Venezuelan nationals deported to El Salvador’s CECOT prison. The judge ruled that the deportations, conducted under the 1798 Alien Enemies Act without individual judicial review, violated due process rights. While the Supreme Court vacated a prior injunction halting the deportations, it affirmed the right to individual habeas corpus petitions. The judge deemed the situation “Kafkaesque,” citing evidence suggesting many detainees lacked gang ties and were imprisoned based on flimsy accusations. The ruling mandates the return of the Venezuelans to the U.S. to challenge their deportations.
Read More
A Politico report alleges that Trump administration officials delayed and redacted a USDA report predicting an increase in the farm goods trade deficit, contradicting the president’s claims about his economic policies. The delay, attributed by the USDA to internal review, is viewed by some as political interference designed to suppress data unfavorable to the administration. This incident raises concerns about the integrity of government reports and the public’s trust in the accuracy of official data, especially given existing questions regarding data reliability. The potential for political manipulation of government reports, regardless of intent, undermines public confidence in the information produced by federal agencies.
Read More
Following a U.S. District Judge’s ruling, a Guatemalan man, O.C.G., wrongly deported without due process, has been returned to the United States by the Trump administration. The judge determined O.C.G.’s deportation violated his rights, citing a lack of notice and opportunity to contest his transfer to Mexico, where he faced danger. O.C.G., who sought asylum after violent attacks in Guatemala, will now undergo further due process proceedings. This marks a significant precedent, as it is the first high-profile case where the administration has complied with such a court order.
Read More
During a Senate Appropriations Committee hearing, Senator Reed challenged Education Secretary McMahon’s claim of a trillion-dollar budget cut, correctly calculating a $12 billion reduction based on her stated $1.2 billion figure. This $12 billion cut represents a 15.3% decrease from the previous year’s budget, totaling $66.7 billion in requested funding for fiscal year 2026. The reduction reflects the administration’s aim to reduce federal spending on education and return control to state and local levels, aligning with ongoing efforts to significantly downsize the Department of Education. These actions are part of a broader plan to eliminate federal overreach in education.
Read More
A DeSmog investigation reveals over 50 high-level Trump administration officials, including 70% of his Cabinet, have ties to Project 2025, a Heritage Foundation plan to expand executive power and shrink the government. Many of these officials directly contributed to or worked for groups behind the plan’s “Mandate for Leadership” document. This contradicts Trump’s repeated denials of involvement, as numerous administration policies directly align with Project 2025’s proposals. The findings highlight the significant influence of Project 2025 despite its low public approval.
Read More
The FBI, at the behest of the Trump administration, solicited tips on doctors providing gender-affirming care to transgender youth, labeling it “mutilation.” This action contradicts the consensus of major medical organizations, which confirm that surgical interventions are rare for minors and nonexistent for those under 12. In response, LGBTQ+ advocates and allies flooded the FBI tip line with angry messages and protests, challenging the administration’s characterization of gender-affirming care and its targeting of transgender individuals. This campaign, while unlikely to stop the administration’s broader attacks, signifies resistance to the criminalization of transgender healthcare.
Read More
Elizabeth Warren’s report alleging that Elon Musk profited from his interactions with the Trump administration isn’t exactly breaking news. The report itself, while detailed, essentially compiles evidence of what many observers already saw happening in real-time. It’s less an accusation and more a formal documentation of events that played out publicly, from Tesla’s perceived favoritism to Musk’s prominent presence in the White House.
The report highlights what many perceive as a pattern of enrichment among those within the administration. The suggestion isn’t solely focused on Musk; it points to a broader system where individuals in positions of power leverage their influence for personal gain.… Continue reading
Internal ICE emails reveal instructions from senior officials to significantly increase arrests, including those of undocumented individuals encountered incidentally (“collaterals”), even without warrants. These directives, urging officers to be more creative and “push the envelope,” represent a major escalation of the Trump administration’s immigration enforcement efforts. The push for increased arrests follows pressure from high-level officials to reach daily apprehension targets of at least 3,000. This approach disregards previous court settlements requiring warrants for arrests and raises concerns about potential legal violations and abuses.
Read More
The Trump administration revoked the Biden administration’s 2022 guidance ensuring emergency abortion access for women in medical crises, a move that stemmed from the Supreme Court’s overturning of Roe v. Wade. This reversal, celebrated by anti-abortion groups, is feared by abortion rights advocates to jeopardize women’s lives in states with strict abortion bans. While the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services maintains enforcement of federal law regarding emergency medical conditions, the action creates uncertainty for hospitals and potentially delays critical care. The Supreme Court previously issued a procedural ruling on a related case, leaving key questions surrounding emergency abortion access unresolved.
Read More
A new Senate report details how Elon Musk, during his 130 days as a Trump administration employee, leveraged his access to advance his business interests. The report, authored by Senator Elizabeth Warren, cites over 130 instances where Musk, his companies, and family members engaged in actions raising ethical and conflict-of-interest concerns, ranging from securing lucrative contracts to hindering regulatory oversight. While not all actions are illegal, the report argues Musk violated established norms at an unprecedented rate, harming the public interest. The report categorizes these actions across fifteen areas, including White House promotion of Tesla, securing government contracts, and stifling investigations into his companies.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood