Leaked applications for the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025 initiative reveal that several individuals seeking roles in a potential Trump administration cited influences from Nazi political theorists and other far-right figures. The applications, sourced from a database breach, showcase the convergence of Republicans and the far-right, including applications from members of nativist and antisemitic groups. Several applicants expressed admiration for Carl Schmitt, a political theorist with ties to the Nazi regime, and Nayib Bukele, the authoritarian president of El Salvador. The applications also highlighted influences from prominent white nationalists and other fringe figures, raising concerns about the ideological leanings of potential appointees.
Read More
The article reports on a series of military strikes launched during the Trump administration targeting alleged drug-running boats, resulting in over 80 deaths. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth reportedly issued a verbal order to leave no survivors, leading to a second strike that killed two survivors of an initial attack. Legal experts and members of Congress have raised concerns, labeling the actions as potential extrajudicial killings and war crimes. While the Department of Defense declined to comment, the administration maintains the strikes are legal, targeting “narco-terrorists” in an ongoing “armed conflict.”
Read More
Former US Secretary of State John Kerry expressed strong criticism of the second Trump administration, citing perceived corruption and declining political standards. Kerry also voiced disappointment in the recent Cop30 climate conference, suggesting it lacked ambition and that the US’s absence negatively impacted the outcome, potentially hindering the global transition away from fossil fuels. Despite this, he remains optimistic about the clean energy transition’s continuation, although he expressed concern about the timeline to avoid the worst effects of climate change. Kerry further indicated that the COP process is “losing credibility,” due to disappointing outcomes.
Read More
More than 220 judges rejecting the Trump administration’s mass detention policy is a significant number, and it speaks volumes about the extent to which the policy was deemed problematic. It highlights the widespread concern among the judiciary that the policy was likely an overreach, or perhaps simply unjust. When so many judges, from different jurisdictions and likely with varying political leanings, come to the same conclusion, it’s hard to dismiss it as a fringe opinion or an outlier case. The implication is clear: the administration’s approach to immigration detention, and potentially its broader immigration policies, was seen as excessively harsh, possibly illegal, and certainly not in line with established legal norms.… Continue reading
The Trump administration, under alleged orders from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to leave no survivors, launched over a dozen strikes on suspected drug-running vessels, resulting in over 80 deaths. A specific incident involved a missile strike in the Caribbean, where two survivors of the initial attack were reportedly killed by a second strike on orders to eliminate all witnesses. These actions have drawn intense scrutiny, with legal experts labeling them as potential war crimes and extrajudicial killings due to the lack of legal justification and the alleged targeting of individuals posing no imminent threat. Despite this scrutiny, the administration has stated that they are engaged in an “armed conflict” with drug cartels and the Department of Justice claims military personnel won’t face criminal prosecution.
Read More
Officials criticize Biden’s vetting processes, but a stark reality underscores this critique: the Afghan shooting suspect, the very individual who ignited this political firestorm, was granted asylum during the Trump administration. This seemingly simple fact throws a wrench into the narrative.
The focus on the current administration’s perceived failings often overshadows the context of the events. It’s a recurring pattern: when things go wrong, the blame game begins, and the spotlight shifts to the opposing side. In this instance, the scrutiny of Biden’s vetting protocols, while valid on its own, seems to conveniently overlook the fact that the asylum was granted under Trump.… Continue reading
The Cato Institute released data challenging the Trump administration’s claims about prioritizing dangerous criminals in immigration operations. Data from October 1 to November 15 revealed that 73% of those booked into ICE custody had no criminal convictions, with around two-thirds of those having no pending charges either. Further analysis showed that the number of arrests of immigrants without convictions or pending charges surged significantly under Trump, despite the administration’s stated goals. In response, DHS officials dismissed the data as propaganda, drawing criticism from immigration advocates who pointed to the data’s credibility and its basis in publicly available information.
Read More
Trump Administration’s actions are poised to escalate the military presence in Washington, D.C. following the tragic shooting of two National Guard members. This event, occurring amidst an already tense political climate and a court order to reduce military presence, raises serious concerns about the administration’s intentions. It’s difficult to ignore the potential for this incident to be exploited to further an agenda of increased control and an authoritarian direction.
The timing of this shooting is, to put it mildly, suspect. Given the court order demanding the removal of troops, the fact that such an event occurred shortly after is extremely difficult to disregard.… Continue reading
Following a video message by Senator Mark Kelly, the Trump administration initiated a review of his comments, potentially leading to a court-martial. This action has drawn criticism from Republican senators, who defended Kelly and emphasized the military’s right to refuse illegal orders. The FBI has also launched an inquiry, adding to the controversy. Kelly, who is protected by the speech and debate clause, has stated he is not backing down and has publicly criticized the Defense Secretary for what he feels is blind loyalty to Trump.
Read More
Newly released emails reveal the FBI’s “Special Redaction Project,” a costly initiative driven by political pressure to release files related to Jeffrey Epstein. President Trump’s administration, particularly under Attorney General Pam Bondi, pushed for the release of these documents, fueling a conspiracy theory about Epstein’s connections. The project involved a significant investment in overtime, with agents undergoing crash-course training to redact materials, including surveillance footage and records related to Epstein’s death. Ultimately, the Epstein Files Transparency Act compelled the DOJ to release the files, allowing for redactions to protect ongoing investigations and victim privacy.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood
ICE Targets Non-Criminals: DHS Data Reveals Arrest Shift
The Cato Institute released data challenging the Trump administration’s claims about prioritizing dangerous criminals in immigration operations. Data from October 1 to November 15 revealed that 73% of those booked into ICE custody had no criminal convictions, with around two-thirds of those having no pending charges either. Further analysis showed that the number of arrests of immigrants without convictions or pending charges surged significantly under Trump, despite the administration’s stated goals. In response, DHS officials dismissed the data as propaganda, drawing criticism from immigration advocates who pointed to the data’s credibility and its basis in publicly available information.
Read More