South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem, known for her conservative stances and national prominence within the Republican Party, has been chosen by President Trump to lead the Department of Homeland Security. This appointment comes after Noem’s successful reelection campaign, which saw her leverage her handling of the COVID-19 pandemic and her outspoken opposition to government mandates. Trump’s choice of Noem, a strong supporter of his immigration policies, signals his intent to prioritize border security and crack down on illegal immigration. The agency, which has faced significant turmoil and leadership changes under Trump’s previous administration, oversees a massive budget and workforce.
Read More
President-elect Donald Trump has begun filling key administration positions with individuals known for their controversial and often hard-line views, raising concerns from progressive advocates. These appointments include Elise Stefanik as U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, Brian Hook leading the State Department transition team, Lee Zeldin as EPA administrator, Tom Homan as “border czar,” and Stephen Miller as deputy chief of staff for policy. These individuals have a history of promoting policies that critics argue will be harmful to the environment, immigrants, and social programs. Adding to these concerns is the fact that Trump’s transition team has yet to sign legally required ethics agreements, potentially indicating a return to the conflicts of interest that plagued his first term.
Read More
Stephen Miller, known for his extreme anti-immigrant views and his role in shaping Trump’s first-term immigration policies, has returned to the White House. Miller, who has advocated for policies including mass deportations, military border enforcement, and family separation, has been a key architect of Trump’s “America First” immigration agenda. His appointment comes as no surprise, given his influence on Trump’s rhetoric and policies, even though he lacked prior policy or legal expertise. Miller’s history of promoting white nationalist narratives and his association with Steve Bannon solidify his connection to the far-right agenda.
Read More
The Trump administration has announced that it will conduct workplace immigration raids, a move that has been met with widespread criticism. The administration claims that these raids are necessary to enforce immigration laws and crack down on undocumented workers. However, critics argue that these raids will have a devastating impact on the economy, businesses, and the lives of undocumented immigrants.
The administration has stated that it will target workplaces that are not under its protection, suggesting that businesses with ties to the private prison industry may be spared. This raises concerns about the potential for corruption and abuse, as the private prison industry stands to profit from an increase in the number of undocumented immigrants detained.… Continue reading
Stephen Miller, a leading advocate for stricter immigration policies, is set to become White House deputy chief of staff for policy under President-elect Donald Trump’s second term. Miller, a key figure in Trump’s first administration, has been instrumental in shaping the president-elect’s immigration agenda, including plans for mass deportations and the creation of detention centers. Miller’s appointment signifies a continuation of Trump’s hardline immigration policies and suggests a second term focused on aggressive enforcement measures. His influence on the White House will likely lead to increased scrutiny and potential legal challenges to Trump’s immigration agenda.
Read More
The prospect of Donald Trump returning to the White House sends chills down the spines of many government officials, but within the Department of Justice, the fear is palpable. The sense of dread stems from the belief that Trump will install loyalists in key positions, effectively dismantling the existing system and replacing career civil servants with individuals whose sole qualifications are unwavering loyalty to Trump and a disdain for the status quo. This potential shift evokes images of authoritarian regimes like Hungary and Russia, where the erosion of democratic institutions has paved the way for unchecked power.
The fear is not unfounded.… Continue reading
The author argues that a Trump administration will severely harm climate action and environmental protection, both domestically and internationally, putting the planet and its inhabitants at risk. While acknowledging the dire situation, the author urges readers to focus on being resolute and prepared rather than on hope. They emphasize the importance of recognizing the patterns of history and remembering the courage of past heroes in the face of oppression. The author encourages readers to be active in their communities, supporting organizations and policies that protect human rights and the environment, while simultaneously building a strong self and finding solace in personal values and community. Finally, the author reminds readers that even small actions can contribute to the rescue of the world, urging everyone to participate in the fight for a better future.
Read More
The recent election has fueled a wave of concern among some blue state leaders, prompting them to contemplate strategies for thwarting potential federal overreach under a Trump administration. These concerns stem from Trump’s past rhetoric and actions, which some perceive as threatening to their state’s autonomy and values.
A recurring theme among these anxieties is the potential for Trump to exploit his power to control federal funding, potentially withholding resources from states that oppose his policies. Blue states fear that Trump could use this leverage to pressure them into complying with his agenda, jeopardizing their ability to implement programs crucial to their residents’ well-being.… Continue reading
Democratic governors in blue states are actively preparing to shield their states and residents from federal actions under the new Trump administration. They are enacting a variety of legal and political moves, including convening special legislative sessions, bolstering legal resources, and codifying state laws to protect rights related to reproductive healthcare, climate action, and immigrant families. These efforts reflect a continuation of the resistance to Trump from liberal states during his first term and foreshadow a similar pattern of confrontation this time around. Governors like Newsom, Pritzker, and Hochul have already outlined their strategies, emphasizing their commitment to safeguarding the rights and values of their constituents.
Read More
Gavin Newsom, the governor of California, has been criticized for his efforts to “Trump-proof” the state, a move that has enraged the incoming president. Newsom has implemented a number of policies designed to protect California from the policies of the Trump administration, including measures to protect immigrants, the environment, and LGBTQ rights. These efforts have been met with anger and resentment from Trump supporters, who view them as an attack on their values.
Some argue that Newsom’s policies are necessary to protect California from the harmful effects of the Trump administration, such as the separation of families at the border and the rollback of environmental regulations.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood