Officials in Washington, D.C., are suing the Trump administration, alleging the president violated the Constitution and federal law by deploying thousands of National Guard troops into the city without local consent. The lawsuit claims the troops, many from out of state, have been deputized by the U.S. Marshals office and are conducting law enforcement activities. The deployment is argued to undermine the city’s autonomy, erode trust, and harm the local economy. While the White House claims the lawsuit is an attempt to undermine the president’s anti-crime efforts, the lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court, seeks to stop the violations and preserve the District’s sovereignty.
Read More
The alcohol industry, with allies in Congress and the Trump administration, has sought to bury a government study revealing the link between alcohol consumption and various health risks, including cancer. The industry’s efforts have apparently succeeded, as the Trump administration is not publishing the study, which found negative health effects starting at low levels of drinking. Simultaneously, the National Academies of Sciences published a controversial report potentially downplaying these risks, potentially paving the way for less restrictive dietary guidelines regarding alcohol consumption. This decision, seemingly in favor of the industry, could leave Americans less informed about the dangers of alcohol.
Read More
In a recent ruling, a federal judge invalidated the Trump administration’s freeze of $2.2 billion in grant funds to Harvard University. The judge determined the funding freeze was an illegal and ideologically motivated action targeting universities. The court found that the administration’s focus on antisemitism served as a pretext for imposing demands that violated First Amendment protections. The court’s decision vacated the freeze orders and barred their enforcement, though the White House has announced plans to appeal.
Read More
A federal judge in Boston has overturned the Trump administration’s decision to freeze nearly $2.2 billion in federal grants to Harvard University. The court order stated that the administration used antisemitism as a pretext for politically motivated actions, violating the Administrative Procedure Act, the First Amendment, and Title VI. The judge found that the administration failed to demonstrate a non-retaliatory basis for the grant terminations, which included demands related to university ideology and pedagogy. Despite the ruling, the White House and the Education Department expressed disagreement, maintaining Harvard’s ineligibility for future grants and criticizing the university’s handling of discrimination issues.
Read More
Federal grand juries in Washington, D.C., are repeatedly refusing to indict cases brought by the Trump-appointed U.S. Attorney, Jeanine Pirro, under the Trump administration’s “federal crime crackdown.” This trend is exemplified by the case of Nathalie Rose Jones, who was accused of threatening Trump online; the grand jury returned “no bill” despite the charges. This reflects the grand jury’s resistance to the cases, as they are unconvinced by the evidence. The grand jury’s refusals have been occurring in multiple other cases as well, creating a rare clash between federal authority and local jurors.
Read More
Secretary Kristi Noem confirmed the Trump administration’s intention to expand Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations in major cities, including Chicago, stating that more resources will be added to existing operations. While declining to specify the details of the expansion or whether it would involve National Guard troops, she acknowledged that such decisions are at the President’s discretion. This announcement follows Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson’s executive order to explore countermeasures against potential federal law enforcement surges, a move prompted by reports of imminent militarized activity. Noem also indicated that other cities, including Boston and those led by Republican officials, are being evaluated for potential operations.
Read More
The Trump administration faces the potential of returning nearly $100 billion in customs duties, according to analysts, following a court ruling on the legality of tariffs. The US Court of Appeals upheld a lower court’s ruling, determining that Trump acted unlawfully by implementing broad import levies without Congressional approval. Although the appeals court voted in favor of the initial judgment, the tariffs remain in effect while the Trump administration appeals to the Supreme Court. These tariffs, first introduced in February, have generated approximately $100 billion in extra customs duties.
Read More
The United States has implemented a suspension of visa approvals for almost all Palestinian passport holders, as reported by the New York Times. This includes restrictions beyond those previously announced for Gaza visitors, impacting travel for medical treatment, education, and business. The State Department confirmed denying and revoking visas for Palestine Liberation Organization and Palestinian Authority members. This move aligns with the Trump administration’s stance, holding these entities accountable and impacting the prospects for peace.
Read More
Following the Trump administration’s termination of the climate.gov website, a team of climate communication experts is working to resurrect its content through a new organization, climate.us. This new platform will not only offer accessible interpretations of climate science but may also provide climate-related services, such as aiding local governments. Led by former climate.gov managing editor Rebecca Lindsey, the team, composed of volunteers, is leveraging outside support and developing a crowdsourced fundraising drive. The goal is to provide the public with essential climate literacy, independent of government agencies, and continue the vital work that was previously accessible.
Read More
A month before a fatal shooting, the Trump administration slashed funding from a Homeland Security program designed to prevent mass shootings. This downsizing significantly impacted the DHS’ Center for Prevention Programs and Partnerships, leading to the termination of grants for local agencies in Minnesota. These grants were crucial for establishing multidisciplinary teams aimed at identifying and managing potential threats. While DHS officials defended the decision, critics argued that the loss of these programs left communities more vulnerable, potentially impacting the ability to prevent the tragic event.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker