The Trump administration, under alleged orders from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to leave no survivors, launched over a dozen strikes on suspected drug-running vessels, resulting in over 80 deaths. A specific incident involved a missile strike in the Caribbean, where two survivors of the initial attack were reportedly killed by a second strike on orders to eliminate all witnesses. These actions have drawn intense scrutiny, with legal experts labeling them as potential war crimes and extrajudicial killings due to the lack of legal justification and the alleged targeting of individuals posing no imminent threat. Despite this scrutiny, the administration has stated that they are engaged in an “armed conflict” with drug cartels and the Department of Justice claims military personnel won’t face criminal prosecution.
Read More
Officials criticize Biden’s vetting processes, but a stark reality underscores this critique: the Afghan shooting suspect, the very individual who ignited this political firestorm, was granted asylum during the Trump administration. This seemingly simple fact throws a wrench into the narrative.
The focus on the current administration’s perceived failings often overshadows the context of the events. It’s a recurring pattern: when things go wrong, the blame game begins, and the spotlight shifts to the opposing side. In this instance, the scrutiny of Biden’s vetting protocols, while valid on its own, seems to conveniently overlook the fact that the asylum was granted under Trump.… Continue reading
The Cato Institute released data challenging the Trump administration’s claims about prioritizing dangerous criminals in immigration operations. Data from October 1 to November 15 revealed that 73% of those booked into ICE custody had no criminal convictions, with around two-thirds of those having no pending charges either. Further analysis showed that the number of arrests of immigrants without convictions or pending charges surged significantly under Trump, despite the administration’s stated goals. In response, DHS officials dismissed the data as propaganda, drawing criticism from immigration advocates who pointed to the data’s credibility and its basis in publicly available information.
Read More
Trump Administration’s actions are poised to escalate the military presence in Washington, D.C. following the tragic shooting of two National Guard members. This event, occurring amidst an already tense political climate and a court order to reduce military presence, raises serious concerns about the administration’s intentions. It’s difficult to ignore the potential for this incident to be exploited to further an agenda of increased control and an authoritarian direction.
The timing of this shooting is, to put it mildly, suspect. Given the court order demanding the removal of troops, the fact that such an event occurred shortly after is extremely difficult to disregard.… Continue reading
Following a video message by Senator Mark Kelly, the Trump administration initiated a review of his comments, potentially leading to a court-martial. This action has drawn criticism from Republican senators, who defended Kelly and emphasized the military’s right to refuse illegal orders. The FBI has also launched an inquiry, adding to the controversy. Kelly, who is protected by the speech and debate clause, has stated he is not backing down and has publicly criticized the Defense Secretary for what he feels is blind loyalty to Trump.
Read More
Newly released emails reveal the FBI’s “Special Redaction Project,” a costly initiative driven by political pressure to release files related to Jeffrey Epstein. President Trump’s administration, particularly under Attorney General Pam Bondi, pushed for the release of these documents, fueling a conspiracy theory about Epstein’s connections. The project involved a significant investment in overtime, with agents undergoing crash-course training to redact materials, including surveillance footage and records related to Epstein’s death. Ultimately, the Epstein Files Transparency Act compelled the DOJ to release the files, allowing for redactions to protect ongoing investigations and victim privacy.
Read More
In a court filing, the Justice Department disclosed that Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem made the final decision to allow deportees to be transferred to El Salvador despite a judge’s order to return the flights to the United States. The administration maintains it did not violate the court’s order, although it identified officials involved in the decision. Judge Boasberg accused the government of showing “willful disregard” for his rulings regarding the deportation of Venezuelan gang members. The case stems from the Trump administration’s initiative, which has faced legal challenges regarding due process, and the ACLU is seeking testimony from multiple officials.
Read More
Representative Ruben Gallego strongly defended Senator Mark Kelly in a video message and on CNN, criticizing Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and accusing the Trump administration of intimidation. Gallego’s remarks came after Kelly, along with other lawmakers, reminded military members of their right to refuse unlawful orders, a statement that drew condemnation from Trump. Gallego argued the Democrats were simply reiterating existing military code and that the current administration’s actions reflect an unprecedented politicization of the military, pointing to recent military actions outside of congressional authorization as examples. The representative claims this is an attempt to distract from the impending release of files on Jeffrey Epstein and the lack of a Republican healthcare plan.
Read More
The story, “Exclusive: US peace plan for Ukraine drew from Russian document, sources say,” paints a rather concerning picture, doesn’t it? It suggests that the supposed US peace plan for Ukraine wasn’t just influenced by Russia; it was essentially a Russian document. That’s a stark revelation. It makes you wonder how such a thing could happen, and the implications of it are quite unsettling.
It seems pretty evident that the initial plan resembled something akin to Russia’s terms for a complete Ukrainian surrender. The idea that a US administration, specifically the Trump administration, might have relied on a Russian document to shape its own peace proposal raises serious questions.… Continue reading
The Trump administration is justifying its boat strikes against drug cartels in the Caribbean as collective self-defense on behalf of US allies, specifically citing cartels’ alleged armed violence against allied security forces and their use of cocaine profits to fund it. This legal analysis, formalized in a classified Justice Department Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) opinion, allows the use of lethal force under the “law of armed conflict,” circumventing federal murder statutes. However, this rationale sharply contrasts with Trump’s public narrative, which focuses on stopping overdose deaths. Critics have voiced skepticism, as the claim that cartels are primarily using cocaine proceeds to wage war rather than for financial gain lacks public evidence and the OLC did not fully vet.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood
ICE Targets Non-Criminals: DHS Data Reveals Arrest Shift
The Cato Institute released data challenging the Trump administration’s claims about prioritizing dangerous criminals in immigration operations. Data from October 1 to November 15 revealed that 73% of those booked into ICE custody had no criminal convictions, with around two-thirds of those having no pending charges either. Further analysis showed that the number of arrests of immigrants without convictions or pending charges surged significantly under Trump, despite the administration’s stated goals. In response, DHS officials dismissed the data as propaganda, drawing criticism from immigration advocates who pointed to the data’s credibility and its basis in publicly available information.
Read More