During a CNN interview, White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller stated that President Trump had “plenary authority” regarding the deployment of the National Guard in Oregon, before abruptly cutting himself off. This statement has raised concerns due to the implications of plenary authority, which grants a single official absolute power, contradicting the U.S. system of separation of powers. The use of such authority has drawn comparison to dictators and prompted protests against perceived overreach by the Trump administration. Miller’s silence and the subsequent lack of further clarification have left the meaning behind the statement unclear.
Read More
A Chicago pastor, Rev. David Black, injured during a protest outside a Broadview ICE facility, is now a plaintiff in a federal lawsuit challenging the Trump administration’s response to demonstrations. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) filed the lawsuit on behalf of journalists, media organizations, clergy, and local residents, alleging that federal agents used excessive force, including tear gas and pepper balls, against peaceful protestors. The plaintiffs argue that these actions violated First Amendment rights and are seeking to restrict federal tactics at the facility. The court is currently considering a temporary restraining order while the case proceeds.
Read More
During a CNN interview, White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller raised questions when he stated that President Trump had “plenary authority” concerning the deployment of the National Guard in Oregon before abruptly cutting himself off. “Plenary authority” implies absolute power, conflicting with the U.S. system of separation of powers and checks and balances. Miller’s comment, and subsequent silence, came amid discussion of a legal challenge to the administration’s use of the National Guard, and comparisons to authoritarian rule. The incident led to speculation about the implications of the comment and whether Miller realized the ramifications of his words.
Read More
During a CNN interview, White House aide Stephen Miller paused mid-sentence while discussing the President’s authority to deploy National Guard troops, leading to speculation of a technical glitch or a deliberate stop. Miller’s use of the term “plenary authority” sparked controversy, as it suggests the president has broad, potentially limitless power. Despite the on-air issue, the interview resumed with Miller re-asserting the President’s authority under Title 10 of the U.S. Code to deploy federal resources, though he emphasized the administration would abide by the judge’s ruling. This incident raised questions and drew criticism, particularly concerning the scope of executive power in domestic troop deployments.
Read More
During a Senate Judiciary Hearing, Attorney General Pam Bondi engaged in heated exchanges with Senator Dick Durbin and other Democrats. The focus of the discussions revolved around the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files, with Democrats pressing for details and answers regarding the release of information and any potential political interference. Bondi deflected questions and accused Democrats of their own wrongdoings, while also refusing to discuss internal conversations with former President Trump. The hearing highlighted existing tensions and accusations surrounding the Trump administration’s actions, particularly regarding the Department of Justice.
Read More
U.S. District Judge Karin Immergut expressed concern over the Trump administration’s attempt to circumvent her order blocking Oregon National Guard troops from Portland by deploying troops from other states like California and Texas. At a late-night hearing, Immergut questioned the legality of this action, specifically asking if bringing in federalized National Guard troops from California contradicted her previous ruling. After hearing arguments, the judge expanded her order to prevent troops from any state from being sent to Portland, citing the relatively small size of the protests and potential violations of Oregon’s self-governance.
Read More
Dr. David S. Glosser, Stephen Miller’s uncle, has publicly criticized his nephew, including agreeing with a commenter who called Miller a “depraved fiend.” Glosser has previously accused Miller of white nationalism and using propaganda tactics. His posts, which condemn both Miller and President Trump, resurfaced after Miller’s cousin, Alisa Kasmer, posted a viral message severing ties with the White House aide and calling him “the face of evil.” Kasmer, who had once loved her cousin, detailed how her family has suffered under Miller’s influence. Glosser characterized Miller as an “immigration hypocrite” because of his opposition to accepting refugees, given his own family’s history.
Read More
Stephen Miller, a key figure in shaping the Trump administration’s agenda, frequently frames American politics as a battle against “leftwing terrorism,” accusing Democrats, judges, and the media of shielding such threats. This rhetoric, as seen in Miller’s response to an unfavorable judicial ruling, reflects a broader pattern of labeling any opposition to Trump as illegitimate. Miller and Trump view dissent as a form of rebellion, utilizing events like the murder of Charlie Kirk or protests against ICE to justify the use of state power to suppress their political opponents. This strategy underscores a post-liberal approach that rejects neutral standards of conduct, justifying Trump’s actions while deeming any opposition as evil.
Read More
Illinois has filed a lawsuit to prevent the Trump administration from deploying federalized National Guard troops in Chicago, citing concerns of federal overreach and infringement on the state’s sovereignty. The lawsuit argues that the deployment is unconstitutional and will cause irreparable harm to the state’s social fabric, community relations, and economy. This legal action mirrors arguments made in an Oregon federal court’s temporary block of the Trump administration’s actions in Portland. The state seeks a court order declaring the deployment unlawful.
Read More
South Carolina Circuit Court Judge Diane Goodstein’s home was set ablaze, prompting an investigation by state law enforcement. The fire occurred after Goodstein had reportedly received death threats, and resulted in serious injuries to her family members. The incident has raised concerns about political violence, particularly given that the judge had previously blocked the state’s election commission from releasing voter files to the Department of Justice, a decision that was later reversed. This event, along with other incidents of violence and threats against judges, underscores a broader pattern of attacks and increased criticism of the judiciary from political figures, including the Trump administration.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker