The Trump administration’s sweeping cuts to US research funding have caused chaos for Australian researchers involved in joint projects, prompting accusations of foreign interference. A questionnaire sent to Australian researchers demanded justifications for funding and inquired about links to China, stances on gender ideology, and actions against “Christian persecution,” raising concerns about political interference in scientific research. The Australian government is engaging with the US to clarify the situation and protect Australian researchers, while Australian universities have expressed “extreme concern” and sought government intervention. Legal challenges to the questionnaire’s legitimacy are being considered.
Read More
As Trump thaws ties with Russia, a fascinating geopolitical shift has emerged: Britain has seemingly become Russia’s new public enemy number one. This isn’t a sudden development; the animosity between the two nations has deep historical roots, stretching back centuries. However, the current intensity of this rivalry is striking, fueled by Britain’s unwavering support for Ukraine against Russia’s aggression.
Russian officials, speaking anonymously, have openly identified Britain as the primary adversary, accusing London of actively fueling conflict in Ukraine and acting as the West’s driving force in rallying opposition to Russia. This portrayal of Britain as the mastermind behind the anti-Russia coalition speaks volumes about the perceived effectiveness of UK actions.… Continue reading
A federal judge has questioned the Trump administration’s abrupt cancellation of billions of dollars in climate research grants, demanding evidence of wrongdoing to justify such drastic action. The EPA, under administrator Lee Zeldin, cited unspecified regulations in the termination letters, a claim deemed insufficient by the judge. Climate United, one of several groups suing over the cancellations, argues the EPA failed to follow proper legal procedures. The judge requested further filings from both parties, leaving the fate of the grants and the lawsuits unresolved.
Read More
South Korean Foreign Minister Cho Tae-yul suggested that developing nuclear weapons could be a “plan B,” prompted by uncertainty surrounding the new Trump administration’s commitment to defending South Korea against North Korea. This statement, while labeled “premature” by Cho, reflects rising concerns in Seoul about U.S. security guarantees. Although expert Victor Cha downplayed the immediate significance, public support for nuclearization in South Korea is high, particularly within the ruling party. The differing approaches of the Trump and Biden administrations toward Korean Peninsula denuclearization highlight the complexity of the situation.
Read More
A federal judge issued a preliminary injunction ordering six federal agencies to immediately reinstate probationary employees fired as part of the Trump administration’s workforce reduction efforts. Judge Alsup deemed the firings a “sham,” finding that the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) unlawfully directed the agencies to terminate employees under the guise of performance issues, circumventing federal law. The judge rejected the Justice Department’s arguments, criticizing their lack of transparency and refusal to produce key testimony. This ruling is significant, impacting thousands of employees and challenging the administration’s authority to rapidly shrink the federal workforce. The White House has denounced the decision as “absurd and unconstitutional.”
Read More
President Trump withdrew the nomination of former Representative Dave Weldon for CDC director due to insufficient Senate support. Weldon’s past controversial statements questioning vaccine safety, including his promotion of disproven links between vaccines and autism, resulted in anticipated opposition from key senators, notably Senators Collins and Cassidy. This lack of support prevented his confirmation from progressing beyond committee. The White House opted to withdraw the nomination to avoid a protracted and potentially damaging controversy.
Read More
The White House has ordered the U.S. military to develop plans for increasing troop presence in Panama to counter China’s influence and secure the Panama Canal, per President Trump’s directive. These plans range from enhanced military partnership with Panama to a less likely military seizure of the canal, contingent upon Panamanian cooperation. The administration aims to diminish China’s access to the waterway, a move that Panama and China both deny is necessary. This follows Trump’s assertion of reclaiming the canal, although the specifics remain unclear.
Read More
Canadian veterans express dismay and betrayal at the Trump administration’s treatment of allies like Canada and Ukraine, particularly given the shared sacrifices in Afghanistan. This sentiment stems from the perception that Canadian soldiers fought and died to defend the U.S. after 9/11, a notion deepened by Trump’s threats and bullying tactics. While acknowledging the distinction between the U.S. military and its president, veterans highlight the strong bonds forged during their shared combat experiences. Retired military officials emphasize that the anger is directed at the administration, not the U.S. military, and that the threat of annexation, while upsetting, is considered unlikely.
Read More
The Trump administration spent $16 million preparing a migrant facility at Guantanamo Bay, housing 41 migrants before their transfer to Louisiana. This facility, intended to hold up to 30,000 migrants, proved far more expensive than anticipated, with individual tents costing an estimated $3.1 million each and failing to meet DHS standards. All migrants were subsequently moved to an ICE facility in Alexandria, Louisiana, rendering the Guantanamo Bay plan ineffective and costly. Congressional representatives have criticized the plan’s impracticality and expense.
Read More
The Trump administration has halted a $1 billion program designed to preserve affordable housing, jeopardizing crucial upgrades to tens of thousands of low-income housing units across the country. This decision, directed by the Department of Government Efficiency, halts funding for energy efficiency improvements and critical repairs, impacting projects already underway. The termination threatens to destabilize numerous affordable housing projects, as the funding serves as a critical foundation for attracting additional investments. Consequently, many low-income residents face the imminent risk of displacement due to the lack of necessary repairs and renovations.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood