The Bank of Canada governor’s recent statements highlight that the threat of Trump-era tariffs is already impacting the Canadian economy. This isn’t just about the tariffs themselves, but a much deeper erosion of trust and goodwill between the two nations. The casual threats of annexation, the dismissive rhetoric, and the general lack of respect for Canadian sovereignty have created a palpable sense of unease and resentment among Canadians.
This feeling goes far beyond simple economic anxieties. Canadians are deeply hurt by the perceived disregard for their country as a sovereign nation. The casual insults and threats are seen as a betrayal of a long-standing friendship and partnership, causing significant emotional damage.… Continue reading
The Trump administration plans widespread federal layoffs, beginning soon after a February 6th deadline for employees to accept a deferred resignation offer. This offer allows voluntary departure with pay through September 30th, but has been met with strong union opposition and a subsequent lawsuit. While OPM is proceeding with the plan, threatening job loss for non-participants, they have added an early retirement incentive for eligible older workers. The layoffs, excluding postal workers, military, and certain other personnel, could affect a significant portion of the approximately 2.4 million federal employees.
Read More
The State Department’s announcement that US government vessels can now transit the Panama Canal without paying fees has sparked a flurry of reactions, ranging from celebratory to cynical. The immediate takeaway is a cost savings for the US government, however insignificant the amount might seem in the grand scheme of the national budget.
The actual financial implications are surprisingly minimal. Over the past nine years, the total transit fees for US military vessels amounted to a mere $17 million. This translates to a relatively small annual expense, suggesting that any purported cost savings are negligible when considered against the overall US defense budget.… Continue reading
The Trump administration’s potential redrawing of national monument boundaries to facilitate energy exploration is a deeply controversial proposal. The idea itself sparks outrage among many who see it as a blatant disregard for environmental preservation and the legacy of protected lands. The perceived ease of accessing resources within these existing boundaries, compared to navigating the complexities of working with private landowners, fuels the anger even further. It’s seen by critics as a lazy, callous approach that prioritizes short-term economic gains over long-term environmental sustainability.
This proposed action isn’t just about energy extraction; it’s about the very definition of conservation. Once these protected spaces are altered, the changes are often irreversible.… Continue reading
Following recent events in the Gaza Strip, former President Trump declared the United States would assume control of the region. His plan involves a complete rebuilding of the area under American supervision. This interventionist approach contrasts sharply with previous US policy. The statement generated significant controversy and speculation regarding its feasibility and potential implications.
Read More
Former Coast Guard Commandant Linda Fagan was abruptly evicted from her on-base housing with only three hours’ notice following her dismissal from the Coast Guard. The eviction, ordered by Homeland Security officials reportedly at the behest of President Trump, occurred despite a 60-day waiver previously granted for her to find alternative housing. This action, characterized by some as petty and personal, came after Fagan’s removal from her post, ostensibly due to concerns about border security and an alleged excessive focus on diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives. Although the DHS claims alternative housing was provided, Fagan left many belongings behind.
Read More
In the face of widespread personnel cuts within the U.S. government and foreign aid agencies under the Trump administration, Friedrich Merz faces a challenging German election. This comes as Elon Musk’s support for the AfD party, described by Merz as “invasive and presumptuous,” adds to the political climate. Trump’s administration has implemented sweeping changes, including deferred resignations, dismissals of federal watchdogs, and ambitions to seize control of foreign territories. The upcoming German election on February 23rd will be a crucial test for Merz’s lead against the AfD.
Read More
The General Services Administration (GSA) plans to sell half of its managed federal properties, aiming to reduce excess space and deferred maintenance costs, ultimately saving taxpayer money. This initiative, involving lease terminations and workforce reductions, contradicts recent executive orders mandating a return to in-person work for federal employees. The GSA cites a need for more efficient space utilization and a “whole government” approach to resource allocation. Critics argue that this drastic downsizing could lead to a fire sale of federal property and negatively impact mission-critical infrastructure.
Read More
Beginning Friday, thousands of USAID’s direct-hire personnel will be placed on administrative leave, excluding those in mission-critical roles, leadership, or designated programs. This action, driven by the Trump administration’s claims of agency waste and inefficiency, follows a freeze on foreign assistance and has sparked protests from staff and Democratic lawmakers citing potential harm to national security and vulnerable populations. The move is part of broader cuts orchestrated in coordination with Elon Musk, and while a complete closure of USAID requires Congressional action, the ongoing upheaval raises serious concerns about the future of global humanitarian aid. Affected employees were notified by Thursday afternoon.
Read More
Even traditionally pro-Trump outlets like the Wall Street Journal are expressing alarm over the current administration’s policies, signaling a potential shift within conservative circles. This isn’t a sudden moral awakening, but a recognition that the “destruction-for-destruction’s-sake” approach threatens the very systems conservatives previously sought to control. Think tanks like the Manhattan Institute, previously architects of the MAGA playbook, are now openly warning of a constitutional crisis stemming from the administration’s actions. This growing concern highlights a potential fracture within the conservative movement, as some recognize the prioritization of spiteful “owning the libs” over actual governance.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker