The Trump administration, as part of a broader federal workforce reduction, eliminated approximately half of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Epidemic Intelligence Service officers— vital personnel for disease outbreak investigations. These cuts, impacting around 1,270 probationary CDC employees and numerous contractors, significantly reduce the agency’s capacity to respond to public health crises. Similar staffing reductions are impacting other health agencies, including the Indian Health Service, where the cuts have been condemned as potentially life-threatening. These actions contradict recent assurances from the new HHS Secretary that no significant purges were planned.
Read More
Readers are encouraged to submit news tips to The Daily Beast. The submission process is streamlined for ease of use. All tips will be reviewed by the editorial team. Providing valuable information contributes to impactful journalism. Confidential submissions are also welcome.
Read More
The Trump administration, spurred by Elon Musk’s “Department of Government Efficiency,” initiated a large-scale firing of potentially hundreds of thousands of federal probationary employees across multiple agencies. This action, condemned by unions as a politically motivated power grab, targeted employees hired before Trump’s presidency, disregarding performance and due process. The firings, chaotic and poorly executed, are part of a broader effort to dismantle federal agencies and replace career civil servants with political appointees, aligning with a far-right agenda. This purge, critics argue, prioritizes enriching the wealthy over serving the American public.
Read More
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt presented purported evidence of widespread federal fraud, citing examples such as DEI training and climate change mitigation contracts. However, these examples, highlighted by the Musk-led DOGE commission, do not constitute fraud but rather represent programs opposed by the Trump administration. Critics argue that the administration is redefining “fraud” to target programs it opposes, using this as justification for dismantling federal agencies. This action is viewed as a politically motivated effort rather than a genuine attempt to combat waste and fraud.
Read More
Over 300 employees of the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), responsible for managing the nation’s nuclear weapons stockpile, were abruptly fired by the Energy Department, though the department later disputed the number and rescinded many of the terminations. The firings, initially attributed to poor performance, reportedly included personnel directly involved in nuclear weapons production and oversight, causing significant concern among Congress. The incident highlighted a lack of understanding regarding the NNSA’s critical role in national security, prompting intervention from senators and a reversal of many dismissals. The situation remains fluid, with the ultimate number of reinstated employees still uncertain.
Read More
The Trump administration dramatically expanded its termination of federal probationary employees, instructing agencies to proceed with layoffs impacting thousands across various departments. These actions, targeting employees with fewer job protections, followed earlier dismissals and a shift in guidance from initially focusing on underperforming workers. The firings, delivered via email, video calls, and letters, cited reasons ranging from performance concerns to workforce optimization initiatives. Union representatives strongly condemned these actions, citing a lack of evidence of poor performance and alleging politically motivated dismissals. The dismissals are expected to significantly impact public services and national safety.
Read More
The abrupt firing of hundreds of employees at the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), the agency responsible for safeguarding the U.S. nuclear weapons stockpile, has sparked widespread alarm and confusion. This mass dismissal, part of a broader Trump administration directive to purge thousands of probationary federal employees, has been described as a national security crisis by many of the affected individuals. The sheer scale of the firings, impacting a significant portion of the 1,800-person agency, raises serious concerns about the potential for disruption and compromised security. The hasty nature of these actions, seemingly driven by ideological considerations rather than genuine necessity, is deeply unsettling.… Continue reading
Following a ruling against the Trump administration’s federal funding freeze, Judge John McConnell Jr. was accused by Representative Andrew Clyne of being a “partisan activist” and had articles of impeachment drafted against him. This action, mirroring a call by Elon Musk, alleges that the judge’s actions constitute “high crimes and misdemeanors,” a necessary condition for impeachment. The judge has been silent on the matter, and a conviction in the Senate would set a concerning precedent regarding judicial overreach. The impeachment process will now proceed in the House, requiring a simple majority vote before moving to the Senate for a two-thirds majority conviction.
Read More
The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) fired approximately 5,200 probationary employees, a move attributed to administration efforts to restructure the federal government. This included nearly 1,300 employees at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), impacting roughly one-tenth of its workforce and significantly affecting the Epidemic Intelligence Service. While some specialized staff may be retained, the layoffs sparked concern among experts about potential disruptions to public health initiatives. The action follows the recent appointment of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to oversee HHS.
Read More
Fourteen states have filed a lawsuit against Elon Musk, the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), and President Trump, arguing that Musk’s position within DOGE violates the Constitution’s Appointments Clause. The suit mirrors the successful challenge to Jack Smith’s authority in the Mar-a-Lago documents case, utilizing Justice Thomas’s concurrence in that case to support their claim that Musk is an unappointed principal officer. The plaintiffs contend that the executive branch lacks the power to unilaterally create DOGE and that Musk’s actions are therefore unconstitutional. They seek a temporary restraining order, preliminary injunction, and declaratory relief to halt DOGE’s operations and nullify Musk’s actions.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood