At least 50 migrants sent to an El Salvadorian prison, according to a Cato Institute report, had entered the United States legally. This finding directly contradicts claims made by the Trump administration that these individuals were all illegal immigrants. The report meticulously examined a subset of cases, focusing on those with accessible immigration records, revealing a shocking truth: a significant portion of those imprisoned had gained entry through official channels and possessed valid permits.
The report highlighted that many of these migrants arrived legally via established refugee programs or parole programs, initiatives designed to provide temporary work permits to those sponsored by US-based individuals.… Continue reading
A 2021 federal judge ruling deemed the case against Ameen dubious, leading to his release. However, ICE subsequently initiated deportation proceedings, ultimately deporting him to Rwanda under the Biden administration. This deportation, based on weak evidence, marks Ameen as the first deported to Rwanda under the Trump administration’s policies. The article questions whether Ameen will receive restitution or face a similar fate to Abrego Garcia, left stranded abroad.
Read More
After 35 years in the U.S., Gladys and Nelson Gonzalez, a Colombian couple with three U.S.-citizen daughters, were deported despite having no criminal history. ICE confirmed their deportation, citing exhausted legal options following a 1992 asylum application and a 2000 agreement to depart voluntarily. The couple’s deportation exemplifies the Trump administration’s broad immigration crackdown targeting individuals without criminal records. Their case highlights the long-term consequences of immigration policies and the separation of families.
Read More
Trump authorizing ICE to target schools and churches is a deeply troubling development, raising serious concerns about the potential for widespread human rights violations. The very idea of immigration enforcement agents entering these sacred spaces, places traditionally seen as sanctuaries, is jarring and unsettling. It represents a dramatic escalation of aggressive immigration enforcement tactics, moving beyond workplaces and into the heart of communities.
This action raises fundamental questions about the safety and well-being of children. The image of children being forcibly removed from their classrooms by armed agents is deeply disturbing and potentially traumatizing. It’s difficult to imagine the psychological impact on both the children targeted and their peers witnessing such an event.… Continue reading
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker