Elon Musk has been in the spotlight for years, but recent revelations about his alleged secret talks with Vladimir Putin have turned that spotlight into a glaring searchlight. The thought of a billionaire entrepreneur—someone who holds immense power and influence in the tech sector—holding clandestine discussions with a figure like Putin is chilling. It raises alarming questions about loyalty, national security, and the ethical responsibilities of those in power. To think that Musk, who operates SpaceX and has contracts with NASA, could be involved in such discussions is almost unfathomable yet entirely plausible given the current geopolitical climate.
The implications of these secret talks cannot be understated.… Continue reading
Donald Trump being identified as Putin’s source at the top by a former CIA chief is not merely an accusation thrown into the political arena; it’s a matter of grave concern that strikes at the heart of national security. The idea that a sitting President, the supposed leader and protector of a nation, could be easily manipulated and controlled by a foreign adversary is not just alarming, it’s downright terrifying. The revelations of Trump’s compromised ties to Russia, dating back to the late 1980s, paint a grim picture of a President who prioritizes personal gain over the well-being of the country he leads.… Continue reading
Imagine being in a position of trust within the United States military, entrusted with sensitive information crucial to national security, and then choosing to betray that trust for a mere $42,000. That’s the reality for Sgt. Schultz, an intelligence analyst who pleaded guilty to selling military secrets to China. It’s truly baffling how someone could value their integrity and loyalty to their country at such a low price point.
Sgt. Schultz claimed he wanted to emulate the fictional character Jason Bourne, a daring and resourceful spy. But instead of using his position to protect his country and its interests, he chose to sell out and compromise vital information related to missile defense, artillery systems, fighter aircraft, military tactics, and defense strategy for Taiwan.… Continue reading
I can’t wrap my head around the fact that a conservative activist’s son, involved in a relentless attack on the Capitol, was sentenced to nearly 4 years in prison. Reading about the extent of his involvement – from breaking windows to leading breaches, attacking law enforcement, stealing from offices, and attempting to stop the transition of power after a valid election – it’s disheartening to see such a lenient punishment. This traitorous behavior, aimed at overthrowing the government, should warrant a much harsher penalty to deter others from engaging in similar acts in the future.
It’s infuriating to think that individuals who committed treason against their country are getting off with what seems like just a slap on the wrist.… Continue reading
As a former military member, I take the oath we swore very seriously. It is a pledge to support and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic. So, when I hear about an active-duty sailor being convicted in the Capitol riot, my initial reaction is one of disappointment and disdain. How could someone who swore to protect their country actively participate in an event that sought to undermine the very foundations of our democracy?
It is not surprising to hear that this individual is now facing consequences for their actions. Attempting to overthrow the government is not simply a minor offense that can be brushed aside with a slap on the wrist.… Continue reading
The Supreme Court’s reluctance to disqualify Donald Trump from running for president has sparked controversy and disappointment among many Americans. It raises questions about the court’s commitment to upholding the Constitution and fulfilling its duty to make difficult decisions.
One of the main arguments made by those in favor of disqualifying Trump is that his actions on January 6th, when he incited a mob to attack the Capitol, constitute treason under the Constitution. Treason, as defined in the Constitution, includes “levying war” against the United States, which many argue Trump did by inciting the insurrection. However, the Supreme Court seems hesitant to interpret the Constitution in this way and hold Trump accountable for his actions.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood