Ansley Baker and Liz Victor, a cisgender couple, were ejected from the Liberty Hotel during a Kentucky Derby event after a security guard wrongly accused Baker of being a man in the women’s restroom. The hotel’s initial statement claimed the couple shared a stall, leading to a confrontation; however, a subsequent investigation resulted in the security guard’s suspension and mandatory staff retraining on inclusive practices. The Liberty Hotel apologized, donating to an LGBTQ+ organization, and reaffirming its commitment to inclusivity. Baker and Victor dispute the hotel’s initial account and have contacted the mayor’s office to prevent similar incidents.
Read More
Arizona Governor Katie Hobbs vetoed three anti-transgender bills passed by the Republican-controlled legislature. These bills targeted transgender individuals’ ability to change birth certificates, restricted DEI initiatives in higher education and state agencies, and further limited transgender rights in public life. Hobbs, a vocal opponent of such legislation, cited the bills’ negative impact on the state and its workforce in her veto statements. Her actions blocked these measures, which passed along strict party lines, from becoming law.
Read More
Following a legal challenge, the Trump administration reversed its decision to cut off Maine’s school meal funding, totaling over $3 million, after a federal judge ruled the USDA likely failed to adhere to legal procedures. This action stemmed from Maine’s refusal to comply with the administration’s anti-transgender sports ban, a move seen as using school meals to punish inclusive policies. The USDA agreed to restore funding and cease using this tactic, though separate legal action threatening broader education funding remains. This victory for Maine highlights a larger national battle over transgender rights and the use of federal funding to pressure states into discriminatory practices.
Read More
In a defiant speech at a New Hampshire Democratic dinner, Governor J.B. Pritzker urged Democrats to actively resist what he characterized as a MAGA-led assault on democracy and civil rights, advocating for direct action and electoral retribution against complicit lawmakers. He sharply criticized the cautious approach of some Democrats, arguing that prioritizing the defense of vulnerable communities—including transgender youth, people of color, and immigrants—is not a political liability but a moral imperative. Pritzker highlighted his own record of progressive policies in Illinois while condemning the scapegoating of marginalized groups and the targeting of LGBTQ+ individuals and immigrants under the Trump administration. His impassioned address contrasted sharply with recent statements by other Democratic governors, emphasizing the need for bold and unapologetic advocacy.
Read More
An Attorney General has threatened doctors with 10 years imprisonment for providing gender-affirming care, intending to prosecute such actions under the umbrella of “female genital mutilation.” The lack of explanation regarding the legal framework supporting this claim is deeply concerning. The assertion itself seems to fundamentally misunderstand the nature of gender-affirming care and its varied medical applications. This drastic measure appears less about legal precedence and more about a deliberate attempt to deter medical professionals from offering these services.
This move raises serious questions about the Attorney General’s understanding of medical practices and legal definitions. The broad brushstroke approach, lumping diverse medical interventions under the label of “female genital mutilation,” demonstrates a potentially dangerous disregard for nuanced medical care and established legal processes.… Continue reading
Following a court ruling, the Prime Minister reiterated his previously stated definition of a woman as an “adult female,” aligning with comments made by Sir Keir Starmer in various interviews throughout 2023 and 2024. While Sir Keir initially criticized similar statements by Rosie Duffield, he later affirmed her biologically accurate assertion about cervixes. The Prime Minister welcomed the court’s decision for providing clarity on guidance, emphasizing the need for updated policies. Despite this, the Prime Minister’s spokesperson declined to comment on the implications for using preferred pronouns for transgender women, while still insisting on the importance of treating all individuals with dignity and respect.
Read More
Following a UK Supreme Court ruling excluding transgender women from the legal definition of “woman,” thousands protested in London. The ruling, stemming from a Scottish law on gender quotas, clarified that legal definitions of sex are based on biological sex at birth, despite assurances of continued anti-discrimination protections. Protesters voiced concerns that this decision could significantly impact transgender rights across various areas, including healthcare and employment. The British government, however, maintains the ruling provides clarity, while the Scottish government acknowledges the distress caused. The demonstration highlighted widespread anxieties surrounding the potential implications of this landmark legal judgment.
Read More
The Trump administration’s recent launch of a “snitch line” designed to report individuals providing healthcare to transgender children is deeply troubling. This initiative, presented as a means to “protect kids,” is instead a blatant attack on the transgender community and the healthcare providers who support them. The very existence of such a hotline sends a chilling message, fostering an environment of fear and suspicion around accessing essential medical care.
This “snitch line” isn’t operating in a vacuum; its creation coincides with an investigation into a major children’s hospital. This raises serious concerns about the administration’s motives and the potential for politically motivated targeting of healthcare institutions that provide affirming care to transgender youth.… Continue reading
Brazil’s CFM council raised the minimum age for transgender individuals to access hormone therapy from 16 to 18, also prohibiting puberty blockers for minors with gender dysphoria. The council further increased the minimum age for certain gender reassignment surgeries to 21. This decision follows similar actions in other countries, including Argentina, and mirrors growing global debate surrounding the provision of such treatments to minors. The move reflects a broader conservative trend impacting transgender rights, fueled by ongoing political and legal challenges worldwide.
Read More
The UK Supreme Court ruled that the 2010 Equality Act defines “woman” based on biological sex, rejecting the argument that legal sex can be changed through gender recognition. This decision, however, does not remove trans individuals’ protection against discrimination under the Act’s gender reassignment provision. The ruling stems from a case brought by For Women Scotland challenging a previous decision that broadened the definition of “woman.” The Court’s interpretation clarifies that sex-based rights apply to biological sex, while trans individuals retain legal recourse against discrimination based on gender reassignment.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood