More transgender Americans are arming themselves, a trend fueled by rising anxieties surrounding the political climate and escalating anti-trans sentiment. This increase in firearm ownership is a direct response to perceived threats and a lack of perceived protection from either major political party. The feeling of vulnerability is palpable, leading many to prioritize self-defense.
The surge in firearm acquisition among transgender individuals isn’t merely anecdotal. One prominent LGBTQ+ gun rights group has reported the addition of over twenty local chapters since the 2024 elections, a significant expansion indicating a growing demand for community and resources related to gun ownership within the transgender community.… Continue reading
The spectacle of a GOP lawmaker being rendered speechless when directly asked about their transgender status during a hearing is a striking example of the hypocrisy surrounding anti-trans legislation. The lawmaker’s immediate response, declaring the question “inappropriate,” sharply contrasted with the implications of their own proposed bill.
This bill, aimed at restricting transgender girls’ participation in women’s sports, would inevitably subject these young athletes to precisely the type of invasive questioning the lawmaker found so objectionable. The inherent contradiction is jarring: a legislative push to scrutinize the gender identity of minors, yet an outraged rejection when faced with the same scrutiny oneself.… Continue reading
Democratic Governor Tim Walz argues that abandoning the defense of transgender rights is a political mistake, emphasizing that unrelated issues like healthcare costs and economic concerns should not overshadow LGBTQ+ rights. He counters recent Democratic suggestions to avoid contentious debates surrounding transgender athletes in women’s sports, advocating for a multi-faceted approach to address various critical issues simultaneously. Republicans, conversely, have aggressively targeted transgender issues, exemplified by Trump’s anti-transgender executive orders and campaign rhetoric, leading to legal challenges and state-level conflicts. Walz, however, has also faced criticism from some progressives for other policy decisions.
Read More
During a House Oversight subcommittee hearing, Rep. Jasmine Crockett decried the “rage-baiting” attacks on transgender Americans, highlighting the disproportionate focus on restricting trans athletes while ignoring broader economic harms under the Trump administration. Crockett contrasted the Republicans’ vilification of transgender individuals with the Trump administration’s policies that negatively impacted all Americans, exemplified by cuts to Medicaid affecting hundreds of thousands of children. She further criticized the committee’s lack of genuine oversight, suggesting potential financial misconduct among members, specifically referencing Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene’s stock purchases. This led to a brief recess before Greene dropped a motion to strike Crockett’s remarks from the record.
Read More
Ansley Baker and Liz Victor, a cisgender couple, were ejected from the Liberty Hotel during a Kentucky Derby event after a security guard wrongly accused Baker of being a man in the women’s restroom. The hotel’s initial statement claimed the couple shared a stall, leading to a confrontation; however, a subsequent investigation resulted in the security guard’s suspension and mandatory staff retraining on inclusive practices. The Liberty Hotel apologized, donating to an LGBTQ+ organization, and reaffirming its commitment to inclusivity. Baker and Victor dispute the hotel’s initial account and have contacted the mayor’s office to prevent similar incidents.
Read More
Arizona Governor Katie Hobbs vetoed three anti-transgender bills passed by the Republican-controlled legislature. These bills targeted transgender individuals’ ability to change birth certificates, restricted DEI initiatives in higher education and state agencies, and further limited transgender rights in public life. Hobbs, a vocal opponent of such legislation, cited the bills’ negative impact on the state and its workforce in her veto statements. Her actions blocked these measures, which passed along strict party lines, from becoming law.
Read More
Following a legal challenge, the Trump administration reversed its decision to cut off Maine’s school meal funding, totaling over $3 million, after a federal judge ruled the USDA likely failed to adhere to legal procedures. This action stemmed from Maine’s refusal to comply with the administration’s anti-transgender sports ban, a move seen as using school meals to punish inclusive policies. The USDA agreed to restore funding and cease using this tactic, though separate legal action threatening broader education funding remains. This victory for Maine highlights a larger national battle over transgender rights and the use of federal funding to pressure states into discriminatory practices.
Read More
In a defiant speech at a New Hampshire Democratic dinner, Governor J.B. Pritzker urged Democrats to actively resist what he characterized as a MAGA-led assault on democracy and civil rights, advocating for direct action and electoral retribution against complicit lawmakers. He sharply criticized the cautious approach of some Democrats, arguing that prioritizing the defense of vulnerable communities—including transgender youth, people of color, and immigrants—is not a political liability but a moral imperative. Pritzker highlighted his own record of progressive policies in Illinois while condemning the scapegoating of marginalized groups and the targeting of LGBTQ+ individuals and immigrants under the Trump administration. His impassioned address contrasted sharply with recent statements by other Democratic governors, emphasizing the need for bold and unapologetic advocacy.
Read More
An Attorney General has threatened doctors with 10 years imprisonment for providing gender-affirming care, intending to prosecute such actions under the umbrella of “female genital mutilation.” The lack of explanation regarding the legal framework supporting this claim is deeply concerning. The assertion itself seems to fundamentally misunderstand the nature of gender-affirming care and its varied medical applications. This drastic measure appears less about legal precedence and more about a deliberate attempt to deter medical professionals from offering these services.
This move raises serious questions about the Attorney General’s understanding of medical practices and legal definitions. The broad brushstroke approach, lumping diverse medical interventions under the label of “female genital mutilation,” demonstrates a potentially dangerous disregard for nuanced medical care and established legal processes.… Continue reading
Following a court ruling, the Prime Minister reiterated his previously stated definition of a woman as an “adult female,” aligning with comments made by Sir Keir Starmer in various interviews throughout 2023 and 2024. While Sir Keir initially criticized similar statements by Rosie Duffield, he later affirmed her biologically accurate assertion about cervixes. The Prime Minister welcomed the court’s decision for providing clarity on guidance, emphasizing the need for updated policies. Despite this, the Prime Minister’s spokesperson declined to comment on the implications for using preferred pronouns for transgender women, while still insisting on the importance of treating all individuals with dignity and respect.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker