The European Union has issued a stark warning to the United States, promising swift and decisive retaliation should the current administration proceed with imposing tariffs on European goods. This isn’t merely a threat; it’s a reflection of the escalating trade tensions and the potential for a widespread global economic conflict. The situation is fraught with risk, not just for the EU and the US, but for the entire global trading system.
The potential for a retaliatory response from the EU isn’t based on mere posturing. It stems from a recognition that a trade war with the US would involve multiple major economic partners simultaneously.… Continue reading
In a phone call preceding Modi’s US visit, President Trump urged India to increase its US weapons purchases. The conversation also touched upon trade, with Trump reiterating a potential tariff threat. Despite this, the White House emphasized the strong and strategic relationship between the two countries. Plans for Modi’s visit were discussed, highlighting the continued importance of the US-India partnership.
Read More
Canadian consumers are threatening to boycott American-made food products in response to the recent threat of increased tariffs. This potential boycott reflects growing anger and frustration over the ongoing trade dispute between Canada and the United States. The impact of such a boycott on American food exporters could be significant. Consumer action is viewed as a powerful tool to pressure the US government to reconsider its trade policy.
Read More
This Shopping Trends report is editorially independent from CTV News. The team may receive affiliate commissions from purchases made through provided links. Full disclosure regarding our practices can be found by following the “Read about us” link.
Read More
President-elect Trump threatened to use “economic force,” including substantial tariffs, to pressure Canada into addressing trade imbalances, specifically citing the automotive, lumber, and dairy sectors. Prime Minister Trudeau firmly rejected any possibility of Canada joining the United States, emphasizing the mutually beneficial economic and security partnership between the two nations. Trump’s comments, while seemingly aggressive, were interpreted by some as a negotiating tactic to leverage economic grievances. Despite Trump’s rhetoric, Canadian political leaders across the spectrum have unified in rejecting annexation.
Read More
Tensions between Mexico and Canada are escalating amidst a US-imposed tariff threat. Both countries are attempting to secure assurances from the US president-elect regarding the potentially devastating tariffs, while simultaneously highlighting each other’s shortcomings in addressing border security and drug trafficking. Mexico’s president has defended her nation’s cultural heritage and capabilities while criticizing Canada’s fentanyl consumption and use of Mexico in political discourse. Despite a recent meeting between the Canadian Prime Minister and the US president-elect, no concrete commitments on tariff reversals have been made.
Read More
Following President-elect Trump’s claim that Mexico agreed to close its border with the US, Mexican President Sheinbaum vehemently denied the assertion. Sheinbaum clarified that Mexico’s strategy focuses on a comprehensive approach to migration, respecting human rights, and building bridges rather than closing borders. Trump’s announcement followed his promise of imposing a 25% tariff on Mexican and Canadian goods, a move met with opposition from President Biden and Canadian Prime Minister Trudeau. The differing accounts highlight a potential conflict, echoing past disagreements between Trump and Mexican officials regarding border security and trade.
Read More
President-elect Trump’s appointment of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to head the Department of Health and Human Services has sparked alarm within the U.S. agriculture industry, with concerns focusing on Kennedy’s anti-pesticide stance and skepticism of scientific consensus on farming practices. Simultaneously, Trump’s proposed tariffs on Chinese goods threaten a $7.3 billion loss in annual production value for soybean and corn farmers, creating a ripple effect across rural economies. These actions, coupled with the potential appointment of an Agriculture Secretary with strong ties to industrial farming, represent a significant shift in agricultural policy. The overall impact on the $1.5 trillion food industry remains uncertain.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker