Ahead of a meeting with Ukrainian President Zelensky, Vladimir Putin, at the urging of White House envoy Steve Witkoff, warned President Trump against sending Tomahawk missiles to Ukraine during an October 2025 phone call. Witkoff, in a pre-call conversation with a top Russian foreign policy aide, coached Putin on how to appeal to Trump’s ego to ensure a positive call. Following the call, Trump decided against providing the missiles, despite prior consideration and pressure from Zelensky. This decision came even as the Pentagon had approved the transfer of the missiles, and despite Ukraine’s interest in leveraging the weapons.
Read More
President Zelensky revealed that the US weapons industry is prepared to supply Tomahawk cruise missiles to Ukraine immediately if approved by former President Trump. Zelensky noted ongoing discussions with the White House and missile manufacturers, highlighting that Trump has not dismissed the request. These talks also encompass other long-range capabilities, with Ukraine aiming for diverse solutions to counter Russian strikes. Additionally, Ukrainian officials are in positive negotiations with the United States regarding the purchase of these and other advanced military systems, according to Ukrainian Ambassador to Washington Olha Stefanishyna.
Read More
**Trump says no Tomahawks for Ukraine, for now**
Well, let’s be honest, did anyone *really* think Trump was going to just hand over Tomahawk missiles to Ukraine? It feels a bit like a no-brainer, doesn’t it? When you look at how he operates, always focused on the deal, the transactional nature of it all, it’s hard to imagine him doing anything that doesn’t benefit him personally. And, by the way, where are those Epstein files, huh? It’s almost comical how predictable it is.
The situation seems to be, as it always has been, one giant theater production. One call from Moscow, and that’s all it takes.… Continue reading
During a press conference, Russian President Vladimir Putin warned of a “very strong, if not overwhelming” response to any potential US strikes on Russian territory with Tomahawk missiles. Putin also addressed the new US sanctions against Russian oil firms, acknowledging their impact while downplaying their significance and condemning them as an unfriendly act. Furthermore, he emphasized Russia’s interest in dialogue with the US. Despite a meeting between US President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, Zelensky did not receive permission to purchase US Tomahawk long-range missiles, and the planned Budapest summit between Trump and Putin was canceled.
Read More
Trump rejects Tomahawk cruise missiles for Ukraine at meeting with Zelenskyy after call with Putin, and it’s hard not to feel a sense of weary inevitability wash over you. The pattern, as it were, is firmly established. A call with Putin, then a meeting with Zelenskyy, and – surprise, surprise – the requested Tomahawk cruise missiles are off the table. It’s a tale as old as time, or at least as old as this particular political saga.
Of course, the immediate reaction is one of exasperation. There’s a certain feeling that this outcome was not only predictable, but almost preordained. It feels like an episode of a show you’ve seen countless times, and you already know the ending.… Continue reading
During a White House meeting on October 17th, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy proposed a deal to US President Donald Trump, offering Ukrainian drones in exchange for Tomahawk cruise missiles. Zelenskyy emphasized that this exchange would strengthen both countries and allow Ukraine to benefit from advanced weaponry to aid in the technological war against Russia. Trump expressed interest in the Ukrainian drone offer, acknowledging the potential for collaborative production. Prior reports had highlighted the Tomahawk missile provision as a key discussion point, a matter which Vladimir Putin reportedly opposed.
Read More
Despite initially considering the provision of long-range weapons to Ukraine, President Trump backtracked on the idea during a White House meeting with President Zelensky, citing concerns about depleting U.S. supplies and the potential for escalation. Zelensky attempted to negotiate for Tomahawk missiles in exchange for assisting the U.S. in drone production, aiming to counter Russian strikes. Trump’s change of heart followed a call with President Putin, during which Trump alluded to the possibility of arming Ukraine with the missiles. Public support for arming Ukraine is increasing, particularly among Republicans, according to recent polls.
Read More
On October 16, just before a meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, U.S. President Donald Trump expressed hesitancy about providing Tomahawk missiles to Ukraine, citing the U.S.’s own need for the weapons. This reluctance followed a phone call with Russian President Vladimir Putin, during which Putin voiced strong opposition to the potential transfer. Despite this, Trump’s remarks on weapons deliveries contrast with his previous statements and recent criticisms of Russia, leaving the decision regarding the missiles’ supply uncertain.
Read More
Oshkosh Defense unveiled the Extreme Multi-Mission Autonomous Vehicle (X-MAV), a mobile ground-based launcher designed to carry Tomahawk cruise missiles. The X-MAV, showcased at the AUSA exhibition, could potentially address the logistical challenge of deploying Tomahawks in Ukraine, which are currently under consideration for delivery by the U.S. These long-range missiles, with a range up to 2,500 kilometers, could enable strikes on targets deep within Russia, including Moscow and St. Petersburg, significantly increasing pressure on the Kremlin. This potential deployment is a subject of discussion, as Ukraine currently lacks the ability to strike some key Russian targets.
Read More
NATO has authorized the supply of Tomahawk cruise missiles to Ukraine, significantly increasing its long-range strike capabilities, which could strike targets up to 1,500 kilometers away. While initial shipments are expected to be limited, the deployment of these missiles would allow Ukraine to target Russian military assets deep inside Russian territory. Russia has strongly warned of “serious consequences,” but NATO anticipates only rhetorical responses, not direct military action. Deployment faces challenges, including the need for specialized launch platforms and integration with existing Ukrainian systems, though this could also serve as a bargaining chip for further diplomatic talks.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood