During a hearing, Judge Illston indicated she was likely to grant the plaintiff’s motion. She stated that the Office of Management and Budget and the Office of Personnel Management appeared to be disregarding laws during the government spending lapse. Illston believes the plaintiffs will demonstrate that the actions are both illegal, beyond their authority, and arbitrary. The case was brought by the American Federation of Government Employees and the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, representing 800,000 federal workers.
Read More
During a Sunday morning interview on ABC News’ “This Week,” Vice President JD Vance sparred with host George Stephanopoulos over questions about bribery allegations against Tom Homan, repeatedly deflecting the line of questioning. Frustrated by Stephanopoulos’ focus, Vance criticized the line of questioning, leading Stephanopoulos to abruptly end the interview and cut to a commercial break. Vance then took to social media to express his dissatisfaction, accusing Stephanopoulos of prioritizing a “fake scandal” over more pressing issues. The interaction continues a contentious relationship between the MAGA administration and Stephanopoulos, highlighting previous legal battles and accusations of biased reporting.
Read More
Reports from ProPublica and other outlets indicate that former border czar Tom Homan was recorded accepting a $50,000 bribe from an FBI agent in exchange for connecting interested parties with lucrative federal contracts. During an interview on ABC’s “This Week,” Vice President JD Vance dodged questions regarding the alleged bribe, resulting in the abrupt end of the interview. The White House has denied that Homan accepted the money, however, Homan himself has indirectly denied the accusations. Democrats in Congress plan to investigate the matter after the Department of Justice dropped the investigation.
Read More
During a series of Sunday morning show appearances, J.D. Vance struggled to answer direct questions regarding the Trump administration’s actions, leading to an interview being cut short. In one instance, Vance evaded questions about allegations against Border Czar Tom Homan, who was reportedly caught on tape accepting a large sum of cash. Vance also deflected questions about whether Illinois Governor Pritzker should face criminal charges, repeatedly pivoting away from a simple “yes” or “no” answer. Furthermore, Vance faced scrutiny on NBC’s “Meet the Press” regarding layoffs at the CDC, attempting to justify the terminations while appearing to contradict the reality of previous government shutdowns.
Read More
During a White House briefing, the press secretary claimed that border czar Tom Homan did not accept a $50,000 payment from undercover FBI agents, despite internal documents and reporting from MSNBC suggesting otherwise. The alleged payment was in exchange for securing government contracts in a future Trump administration, with the exchange recorded on tape. Although Homan did not deny taking the money, he maintained that he did nothing illegal. The investigation was reportedly closed after President Trump took office.
Read More
In September 2024, former border czar Tom Homan was recorded accepting $50,000 in cash from undercover FBI agents posing as executives seeking government contracts. The investigation, originating from a separate counterintelligence probe, was closed due to insufficient evidence of a specific agreement in exchange for the cash. Despite this, a White House spokesperson criticized the probe as politically motivated, though Homan had stated he would not be involved in specific contract decisions. Prior to this, Homan had been paid by a construction firm that had secured a contract for border wall construction.
Read More
Multiple reports indicate that a Justice Department probe into Border Czar Tom Homan was dropped despite evidence suggesting he accepted a $50,000 bribe during an undercover FBI operation. The investigation, recorded by the FBI, revealed Homan accepting the cash payment in exchange for facilitating government contracts. The probe implicates several high-ranking Trump administration officials, including FBI Director Kash Patel and Attorney Pam Bondi, who have been accused of political interference in shutting down the investigation. Democratic lawmakers are demanding further investigation and the release of all evidence related to the case.
Read More
According to an MSNBC report, the FBI recorded Tom Homan, Donald Trump’s border czar, allegedly accepting $50,000 in cash from undercover agents in September 2024, six weeks before the election, promising to assist in securing government contracts. The investigation, initiated under the Biden administration, was intended to monitor Homan after his appointment. However, after Trump took office, officials appointed by him closed the case, deeming it a “deep state” investigation. While federal officials believed they had a case for conspiracy to commit bribery, the investigation was ultimately shut down before any charges were brought forward.
Read More
Trump Justice Dept. Closed Investigation Into Tom Homan for Accepting Bag of Cash is a stark example of the potential corruption and lack of accountability that can arise within a political administration. The information presented suggests that the former head of Trump’s immigration policy, Tom Homan, allegedly accepted a substantial sum of money, reported to be $50,000 in cash, delivered in a bag, raising serious questions about his conduct. This transaction, the article suggests, occurred while Homan was under investigation by the FBI, according to reports from multiple sources. The most concerning aspect, the article implies, is that the Justice Department, under the Trump administration, chose to halt the investigation into this matter.… Continue reading
Last year, former ICE director Tom Homan, now the White House border czar, was caught on tape accepting $50,000 from undercover FBI agents posing as business executives. The investigation, launched in the summer of 2024, suggested Homan promised to help them win government contracts in a second Trump administration, however, the investigation was stalled shortly after Trump’s return to office. Despite initial intent to monitor his actions in office, Trump appointees officially closed the probe, citing lack of evidence and political motivations, while Homan dismissed the allegations as politically motivated. Legal experts highlight that while bribery charges are inapplicable before holding office, conspiracy or fraud charges could be pursued, depending on the agreement made.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood