Federal immigration authorities detained a third-grade student and his family, sparking outrage and a protest of approximately one thousand people at the home of Border Czar Tom Homan. The detention followed a raid at a local dairy farm, where ICE agents apprehended individuals, including the family, some of whom had voluntarily identified themselves to immigration authorities. Critics, including the New York Attorney General, condemned the actions as unnecessarily disruptive to families and potentially harmful to community trust. Homan maintains that the operation followed proper procedure, while school officials described the children’s distress and the community’s shock.
Read More
Tom Homan’s declaration, “I don’t care what the judges think,” following deportation flights, has ignited a firestorm of debate regarding the rule of law and the balance of power in the American government. His blatant disregard for judicial oversight raises serious questions about the future of the nation’s legal system and the potential erosion of democratic principles.
The statement itself represents a profound challenge to the established norms of governance. It suggests a belief that executive power is supreme, overriding the checks and balances intended to prevent tyranny. This disregard for judicial rulings sets a dangerous precedent, potentially emboldening others to ignore court orders with impunity.… Continue reading
Following Tom Homan’s attacks on Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, accusing her of illegally instructing constituents on evading ICE arrest via a webinar, Ocasio-Cortez defiantly challenged him to pursue an investigation. She maintains her actions were within her legal and representative duties to educate her constituents on their Fourth Amendment rights. Homan’s requests to the Justice Department for an investigation into Ocasio-Cortez’s webinar stem from a larger political conflict between the White House and New York City. Ocasio-Cortez’s office provides resources to constituents regarding their rights when encountering ICE agents, a practice she firmly defends.
Read More
Following a “Know Your Rights With ICE” webinar hosted by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, former ICE Acting Director Tom Homan suggested the DOJ investigate potential interference with immigration enforcement. Ocasio-Cortez countered by highlighting the Fourth Amendment and her right to educate constituents. Homan subsequently labeled Ocasio-Cortez as the “dumbest congresswoman ever elected,” prompting a sharp rebuttal from the congresswoman emphasizing the weakness of his accusations. This escalating feud underscores the ongoing tensions surrounding immigration enforcement and the rights of individuals during such actions.
Read More
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s “know your rights” seminar for constituents, targeting her district’s immigrant population amid Trump administration deportation plans, prompted a vehement response from former acting ICE director Tom Homan. Homan, appearing on multiple news outlets, threatened legal action against Ocasio-Cortez, claiming her actions might impede law enforcement and questioning the legality of a congresswoman informing citizens of their rights. He further leveled personal attacks against the congresswoman. While no Justice Department action has yet been reported, the possibility remains given the administration’s track record and the number of Trump appointees in key positions.
Read More
Former ICE Acting Director Tom Homan is urging the Department of Justice to investigate Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez for potentially obstructing justice by informing immigrants of their rights during ICE encounters. Homan claims Ocasio-Cortez’s actions might be construed as impeding law enforcement, a claim she denies, asserting her actions constitute civil education and ensuring compliance with existing laws. He contends that her actions aid immigrants in evading arrest, even with warrants. Ocasio-Cortez maintains she is simply informing individuals of their constitutional rights and the limits of ICE authority.
Read More
Following a “Know Your Rights with ICE” webinar hosted by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, former Trump administration official Tom Homan questioned whether the event obstructed immigration enforcement efforts, suggesting potential legal repercussions for Ocasio-Cortez. Ocasio-Cortez retorted by suggesting Homan review the Constitution, defending her actions as educating individuals—citizens and non-citizens alike—about their rights during potential ICE encounters. Homan’s criticism follows similar threats levied against other officials who have been critical of Trump administration immigration policies.
Read More
Tom Homan, the incoming border czar, threatened to jail Denver Mayor Mike Johnston for refusing to comply with potential deportation plans. Johnston, who has publicly stated his willingness to be arrested, supports limited deportations for serious criminals but opposes mass deportations. CNN host Kasie Hunt reacted with visible shock to Homan’s statement, describing the rhetoric as more extreme than during the Trump campaign. A former Trump official argued that such strong language is an effective deterrent to illegal immigration.
Read More
The recent pronouncements by Tom Homan, regarding the potential jailing of Denver’s mayor, Mike Johnston, have ignited a firestorm of controversy. Homan’s willingness to imprison Johnston stems from the mayor’s stated intention to actively oppose mass deportations, even to the point of accepting incarceration. This stark clash of wills highlights a deep divide over immigration policy and the role of local officials in challenging federal actions.
The situation is further complicated by the inherent power imbalance. Homan’s position, however defined, carries the weight of a Trump administration appointee, while Johnston is an elected official representing a specific city. The question of jurisdiction and authority immediately arises; can a federal appointee legitimately threaten imprisonment of a locally elected official based solely on their opposition to federal policy?… Continue reading
As the incoming border czar, I firmly believe that undocumented immigrants who are not criminals should be given the option to self-deport. This would allow them to arrange their affairs and depart with their families, ultimately leading to a more orderly and humane process. While criminals will be apprehended and deported, non-criminals can choose to leave voluntarily, thereby easing the strain on our immigration system. However, it’s important to note that the specifics of what happens to their property or future re-entry possibilities remain unclear.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood